Yeah
#1 posted by Vondur on 2005/05/27 00:44:47
i'm tired of gamesurge splits.
let's move to proper quakenet, fellas :>
Yes And
#2 posted by Vondur on 2005/05/27 00:46:45
Ermmmm
#3 posted by Shambler on 2005/05/27 00:57:01
I haven't had any problems with netsplits to be honest. But I don't mind where the channel goes as long as the general status quo is maintained and there is good discussion of mapping, porn, gaming, the stupidity of other gamers/other humans, obscure music, general philosophy and accusing each other of being ravingly gay.
P.S.
#4 posted by Shambler on 2005/05/27 00:57:35
KEEP #TF DRAMA OF FUNC BIATCH!
#5 posted by - on 2005/05/27 00:59:41
[02:35] <scampie> metlslime, Vondur: either of you opposed to a thread at func asking if anyone minds a move to quakenet?
[02:35] <metlslime> i think that's okay
[02:35] <Vondur> yea
On Reflection.
#6 posted by Shambler on 2005/05/27 01:08:04
I vote no (to the move, not to the thread).
#7 posted by - on 2005/05/27 01:21:32
just name yourself MrShambler or Shamblah you whiner.
I Am Comfy
#8 posted by pope on 2005/05/27 01:26:05
where I am.
Also, Moving Forward
#9 posted by - on 2005/05/27 01:32:53
Quakenet's channel bots are no where as indepth in their user levels, which means that the power will shift more toward all ops having mostly equal power. I won't be protected as much, and I'm sure you will all enjoy that.
Yes
#10 posted by Kinn on 2005/05/27 01:42:12
I will support this move as long as czg promises to improve his general behaviour and stops harassing/making sexual threats against me.
Mostly Indifferent,
but if you're going to move the channel anyways, how about naming it something more relevant than Terrafusion?
(of course, I don't have any good suggestions).
Omg
#13 posted by DaZ on 2005/05/27 05:19:49
renaming tf is totally out of the question!!!
but moving it sure whatever. Dont care.
#14 posted by cant map on 2005/05/27 05:45:25
yes plz
Netsplits?
#15 posted by Spirit on 2005/05/27 06:02:30
by the way, i have encountered many more netsplits in quakenet than in gamesurge so far....
What's It Matter
#16 posted by . on 2005/05/27 06:19:51
Me and RPG are banned. Hi RPG.
Phait...
#17 posted by Shambler on 2005/05/27 07:12:40
The difference being that RPG is likely to get unbanned :P.
#18 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/05/27 07:25:07
I vote that Shambler goes ahead and registers the channel and then encourages people to move over so that he gets ownership.
Too Late, Scampie Already Did
#19 posted by czg on 2005/05/27 07:27:18
Yeah
#20 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/05/27 07:34:50
Actually I thought he probably would.
OK
#21 posted by Zwiffle on 2005/05/27 08:16:52
I don't care which one really, doesn't matter much to me. The only way this really affects me is with speed mapping, so if we do switch over I imagine we'd have a #speedq1 on quakenet?
Think About It
#22 posted by pushplay on 2005/05/27 08:39:13
Who here actually uses quakenet? Are the netsplits in fact better? If Spirit is right then there's no point.
#23 posted by - on 2005/05/27 08:44:50
Neither RPG or Phait are banned currently.
in any case If you do not visit #terrafusion, don't bother replying.
#24 posted by - on 2005/05/27 08:48:15
Gamesurge has been sinking into a slow demise since the day they took over Gamesnet. Their Chanserv is the only good thing about them.
There is a channel on Quakenet ATM to test out the network and come visit if you want.
Netsplits In Gs?
#25 posted by megaman on 2005/05/27 09:25:22
didnt experience any netsplits in gs ?!? qnet sucks, too many kiddies. im there anyway tho, so it doesnt matter too much :)
|