Looking Forward
#1 posted by starbuck on 2004/07/26 10:35:03
to new TomazQuake release... Source isn't of any use to me unfortunately though.
Shouldn't This Be In GA?
#2 posted by Kinn on 2004/07/26 11:24:27
#3 posted by - on 2004/07/26 12:47:43
what Kinn said. Who cares?
I Do
#4 posted by DaZ on 2004/07/26 14:12:22
Thanks for the heads up.
Whoops!
#5 posted by Spirit of 85 on 2004/07/26 16:21:14
I just posted without thinking, because the "Submit a News Story"-page said "Note: your news submission will not be visible on the news or forum pages until a moderator has seen it and approved it."...
Sorry, if it was wrong, I thought you should/would like to know:( I wouldn't have posted, if I knew that it would end on the wrong place. Maybe you can move the posting or something. Or maybe you can just close your eyes because a person who never posted here before (but I'm reading;) misunderstood something.
ARGH! English is a hard language when you're not used to use it...
#6 posted by - on 2004/07/26 18:04:35
Sprit: not your fault, whoever approved it should've known better.
Tsch
#7 posted by LTH on 2004/07/26 20:02:28
This is news to those of us who care.
#8 posted by - on 2004/07/26 20:20:29
LTH: I'm glad you 'care', but as we're a level design site and not 'a every incremental little thing that happens in the land of Quake' site, it should not be news here.
Changed Headline
#9 posted by metlslime on 2004/07/26 20:57:17
since this is not actually a tomazquake release. Probably shouldn't be news, but oh well.
P.S. No, i wasn't the one who approved it :)
Sigh
#10 posted by Vondur on 2004/07/27 01:13:46
it was me. sry.
i'm bad mod...
;)
Oh No!
#11 posted by starbuck on 2004/07/27 04:57:31
don't worry Von!! we love you and your nuclear weapons!!
Scampie:
#12 posted by LTH on 2004/07/27 05:54:19
And new engine source from one of the better source coders around of course has no effect whatsoever on mappers...
... no, wait, we're all stuck in 1996, right?
Give Me A Compelling Reason
#13 posted by Kinn on 2004/07/27 12:09:54
to switch from DarkPlaces to Tomazquake, and I'll be very interested. Until then...
meh.
#14 posted by - on 2004/07/27 14:38:53
Kinn: The source is cleaner. And this is very important for mappers to know.
Hmm
#15 posted by nonentity on 2004/07/27 14:59:50
A source release is irrelavent to mappers. Maybe if it was a compiled release, but even then it'd just be another engine to not make maps for (for most of us anyway)
And The Lesson To All Of This
#16 posted by HeadThump on 2004/07/27 18:11:37
Next time you engine developers even think about posting on this forum you HAD better include a few maps with it, or else it is going to get really pissy around here.
Lol
#17 posted by Kinn on 2004/07/27 18:16:52
We await the 'TomazQuake Special "Editor's Choice" Edition' with baited breath...
Ahem...
#18 posted by Spirit on 2004/07/27 18:26:04
Headthump: "engine developers"
Me: OMG, no! I'm not such a crack, I only posted the news...
Sorry again, you were right, the majority isn't interested. BUT: Please fix the Text I misunderstood! So no newbie will do that again. I learnt my lesson...
BTW: Have fun discussing;)
Spirit Of 85
#19 posted by HeadThump on 2004/07/27 18:37:19
Quite alright; that was meant to funny but at no ones expense.
Meh
And new engine source from one of the better source coders around of course has no effect whatsoever on mappers...
Exactly right!
Even if I used (or at all cared about) TomazQuake, I still wouldn't care about this clean source code bollocks!
Having said that, I don't really care if its posted on the front page, or in GA, or not at all!
Frib don't care!
Editor's Choice Edition
#21 posted by pushplay on 2004/07/28 01:16:57
I hear the Hyper Fighting Edition will be even better.
Hmmm
#22 posted by Megazoid on 2004/07/28 07:30:12
I don't really like seeing Tomaz getting a roasting considering everything he has done for the Quake Community, however it probably isn't news that needed to be on Func_msgBoard I agree.
#23 posted by - on 2004/07/28 07:36:12
Megazoid: Nobody is roasting Tomaz. I agree he's done alot of good work. The current issue isn't debating that, just what should and shouldn't be news here.
Oh Okay...
#24 posted by Megazoid on 2004/07/28 07:52:16
/me retracts the my statement then :D
Yeah
#25 posted by starbuck on 2004/07/28 08:02:56
no disrespect to the guy, i read the news wrong and thought there was going to be a new version of tomazquake though, that would have been worth news in my book.
|