Question:
#1033 posted by necros on 2003/05/02 21:33:06
was there ever a side scrolling mod for quake1?
Fatty:
#1034 posted by metlslime on 2003/05/02 21:39:14
a TNT would be fine for fitzquake, q2, and neh, but cube gets sort of choppy on some levels for me (16mb TNT at home.)
Necros:
#1035 posted by metlslime on 2003/05/02 21:41:46
there was one a few years ago called target quake.
also, RenegadeC from #qc has an aborted castelvania mod he started last year.
FATTY
#1036 posted by . on 2003/05/02 23:50:04
I just upped my mem from 48MB to 96 MB too..
this means:
faster-ish compile times (not that i even have time/motivation to map anymore), quake 1, 2 (need to reinstall), hexen 2 (need to reinstall) at higher resolutions smoother
wooo now if only i could get this usb 2.0 card to recognize my scanner..
I Shouldnt Post
#1037 posted by Vodka on 2003/05/02 23:55:57
also, RenegadeC from #qc has an aborted Metroid mod he started ~2 years ago.
fatty: 1st check if there is an AGP slot, then u might get 2nd-hand tnt2 for ~10euro
maric: I guess u should just check what console has the games u like ... And why u`d want a brand new pc (1500$ is all-u-need box + 19"crt btw) if u can just upgrade ur current puter
TNT
#1038 posted by spentron on 2003/05/03 11:25:21
TNT is really limited to 640x480. I had fun with mine but TNT2 or lower Geforce better. 200 CPU is really limited also, Cube really needs a bit more. PCI video OK at that level (and considerably beyond, really) though if it doesn`t have AGP.
TNT
#1039 posted by R.P.G. on 2003/05/03 11:33:00
I had a TNT on my PII 300 with 128mb, and I was running Quake at 1024x768. I was overclocking the PII to 333, also. I was very happy with my TNT.
Just for comparison.
QW Custom Map Ffa Day
#1040 posted by zzjzz on 2003/05/03 17:30:22
Is moved to Sunday this week. Not enough people wanted to play on Saturday. Stop by #terrafusion 3pm EST if you want to play.
My Computer Plans
Stage 1:
* Get hard disk, screen, ISA sound card, ISA modem. Partition hard disk into 10GB chunks and transfer Compaq data.
(There's only two PCI slots in this thing, and one of 'em is occupied by a network card. The other three seem to be ISA slots, but I know where I might be able to get an ISA sound card, preferrably with Line Out and Line In ports. As fer the modem... If it's not possible to get an ISA one, oh well! I'll just agitate for broadband. :)
Stage 2:
Install video card (e.g. Riva TNT64.)
Stage 3:
Compare Ethernet vs. WiFi networking of both PCs.
(The reason I'm considering this is so that if the olds wanna go surfin' they won't interrupt me, they can just open up Mozilla in the front room and go. Actually, they have terrible trouble with logging on and off, so that's another reason to go broadband...
Also, the PCs are about 60'/20m apart, with several walls between them. But we may move again in a few years, so stringing Ethernet cable might be a waste of time; however, WiFi stations aren't cheap.)
Fat
#1042 posted by pushplay on 2003/05/03 20:33:44
Look into getting a cable snake. They're not terribly expensive and they make running cable through the house not so bad.
OMG!
#1043 posted by Shambler on 2003/05/04 02:20:20
Locusts are falling from the sky!
Geese are speaking in tongues!
The sea has turned to blood!
And Fatty is UPGRADING HIS SYSTEM!
P.S. Daz: stay out of my alley you. And yes I`ll try Enclave, looks damn cool, once I have a better system...
Map Reviewage!
.
#1045 posted by wrath on 2003/05/04 16:15:23
/me wants ramshackle back.
WinQuake Alternative
#1046 posted by aguirRe on 2003/05/04 16:29:38
Does anyone know of an improved variant of WinQuake (i.e. software rendering, no OpenGL), that specifically supports higher resolutions than 800x600 ?
I use WinQuake for those maps that for various reasons cannot be loaded into FitzQuake.
UWF
#1047 posted by pushplay on 2003/05/04 17:30:07
What were you playing on that you found it so bright? I thought it was a little dark myself. I prefer to play on glquake with brightness set to the max on the standard palette. That's what I'm lighting my map by.
I also thought the layout of matsp2 was more interesting than you did.
AguiRe
#1048 posted by R.P.G. on 2003/05/04 18:09:11
Tochrisquake supports higher resolutions, I believe. I think that it's dissappeared off the web, though. It also has a few bugs (for example, items that are rotated are not displayed correctly). If you want it, I can e-mail it.
#1049 posted by Vodka on 2003/05/05 00:35:29
that new q1 map+review is worth a news item !
nice map except the lighting ( very bland )
Hey Fatty
#1050 posted by inertia on 2003/05/05 02:51:21
we have a bunch of computers just lying around here that are about as good or better than the one youve just got... where are you? maybe we could work something out
Looks Like Hell Froze Over Too
I appear to have acquired work at a college organising their classroom texts...
Test
#1052 posted by inertia on 2003/05/05 03:45:52
for biff
Lemme Try This Again...
HAYA HAY HAY!!! NICE LAAADY!!!
Test
#1054 posted by inertia on 2003/05/05 03:47:33
for biff
Lemme Try This Again...
HAYA HAY HAY!!! NICE LAAADY!!!
Lemme Try This Again...
HAYA HAY HAY!!! NICE LAAADY!!!
R.P.G
#1057 posted by aguirRe on 2003/05/05 05:48:47
Thanks, I have tried ToChris Quake and QIP Quake and both seem to have the same limitation as WinQuake, i.e. max 800x600 windowed resolution (sorry, I forgot to mention that detail). They all support up to 1280x1024 in fullscreen but I want it in a window.
Any other suggestions ?
|