|
Posted by Shambler on 2003/05/11 15:08:47 |
I thought a trio of themed threads about other entertainment media might be good. If you're not interested, please just ignore the thread and pick some threads that interest you from here: http://celephais.net/board/view_all_threads.php
Anyway, discuss films... |
|
 |
 The Butterfly Effect
#991 posted by starbuck on 2004/12/30 12:17:56
i can't understand how people would think it sucked. I mean, I know it stars Ashton Kutcher, but the general premise is so good that the film couldn't easily be crap.
I got the feeling that there was a lot of unrealised potential that could have propelled it into being really brilliant, but most areas lack the 'magic' as it were. The overall effect is very good, but it could have been a whole lot better.
RPG, I understand exactly what you mean about not being too excited about finding nemo before seeing it. I also often get that with pixar movies, and then i'm proved wrong, The Incredibles for example was really enjoyable. I didn't really like Bugs Life or Monsters Inc. though (apart from when Mike is famous; on the cover of the magasine but under the barcode, hilarious :)).
 The Butterfly Effect
#992 posted by Bal on 2004/12/30 19:13:56
I thought it was pretty average, most notably cause of giant paradoxes in the whole time traveling shizat (can't remember in detail, but theres something about the prison scene that doesnt work, won't go into detail not to spoil tho).
I'd be curious to know what's different in the ending of the DC, cause the ending I saw sucked, instead of explaining the movie it just made it into something stupid.
 Rpg
#993 posted by nitin on 2004/12/30 19:55:44
fair enough, i was just wondering.
 Bal
#994 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/12/31 10:24:12
I've been thinking about the movie quite a bit since I saw it, and, actually, I was surprised at how few paradoxes there are. Thinking back on that specific scene, I can't remember any paradoxes there, either. If you think of one you'd like to share, I'd like to know it.
SPOILERS JUST FOR BAL ABOUT THE DC
I'm not sure where the two movies start diverging, but in the DC, he ends up in the sanitarium after going back in time and watching Kayleigh get blown up in her dad's basement. He asks for his journals, but he had used the first entry to go back in time, and he's told he never wrote any journals. He asks his mom to bring him some old home movies that his dad made, and uses one of them to go back in time to when he was still in his mother's womb, where he strangles himself on his own umbilical cord. Cue scenes of his mother screaming "no, not again", flashbacks of the psychic saying he had no lifeline and was not meant to be born, and flashforwards of everyone growing up with perfectly normal and happy lives.
END OF SPOILERS
So, err, IMO that works a whole lot better than what I've read about the other ending.
 Lemony Snicket's Overly Wordy Title
#995 posted by pushplay on 2005/01/01 23:18:43
The acting was great, the writing ranged from ok to great, but the visual design was friggin fantastic. It was consistent, creative, and attractive. If you watch the movie remember to stay for the credits at the end, they're gorgeous.
This was Jim Carrey's second second great performance this year.
 RPG
#996 posted by Bal on 2005/01/02 07:01:41
MORE SPOILAGE FOR RPG AHEAD!
Ah yeah, the DC ending sounds a bit better, to be honest I can't quite remember what happens in the original after he locks himself up with the movies... But I think its a happy ending with him surviving.
My prob with the prison scene: he uses a journal to make some scars appear on his flesh by going back to his moms kitchen and hacking away at himself with a knife, to make it look like he is getting holy stigmata or some such shit. Prob is, it's presented as if the scars just appear all of a sudden to the other people in the prison, when in fact for them the scars should have always been there in the first place... no? So why the hell are they surprised. Bleh. There were some other things like that but I can't quite remember anymore, they aren't really paradoxes, just badly exploited time travel stuff.
 Bal
#997 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/01/02 12:52:20
Ah yeah I see. Indeed, that is insonsitant with the way time travel works in the movie.
 Stephen King's "It"
#998 posted by . on 2005/01/03 16:07:29
I have the DVD and was browsing IMDB about it... and, if you remember the character Beverly Marsh... the actress was probably just 12 then...
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/carriesconceptions/images/bev12.jpg
http://horrortalk.com/reviews/IT/bloodbath3.jpg
But now?!
-> http://i.imdb.com/Photos/HH/0673932/imdb2.jpg
Wow...
 Er, If That IMDB Link Doesn't Work...
#999 posted by . on 2005/01/03 16:08:25
#1000 posted by - on 2005/01/04 20:35:19
...what are you trying to point out? that she grew up?
 The Incredibles
#1001 posted by cyBeAr on 2005/01/05 16:51:11
Was indeed.... incredible!
My only complaint would be that the killer machine v.10 didn't get to play longer than it did in the big city.
 White Noise
#1002 posted by pushplay on 2005/01/07 12:11:43
The trailer didn't look promising but it was free so I decided to watch it anyways and I'm actually glad I did. I can sympathize with whoever was charged with making an interesting trailer, I'm pretty sure I couldn't do it. White Noise is a horror flick without being a slasher, which is refreshing. It attacks the genre from a new angle of EVP (http://dawghouse.topcities.com/evp.html). EVP is obviously interference but all horror films require a leap of faith like that.
The movie is all around a great horror film but there was one thing in particular that captured my attention. At one point the movie comes to a setting of a rather modern looking apartment with a wall of glass windows and a waterfall directly beneath. The waterfall creates a white-noise sound which is a cool little reminder. Shots with the glass window often have out-of-focus (and thus faceless) people walking and going about their business. It's obviously a reminder of the transient ghosts they're contacting. Clever design like that makes me happy.
 Bleh
#1003 posted by . on 2005/01/08 05:12:21
 Faux Wide Screen
#1004 posted by pushplay on 2005/01/28 10:14:12
All of MGM's 'theatrical wide screen' DVD releases for the last few years have been the pan-scanned versions with the top and bottoms cut off.
http://mgmdvdsettlement.com/
That's a really shitty thing to do to movie fans. There's an eligible dvd list on the site and the claims procedure.
 I Saw A Film...
#1005 posted by Shambler on 2005/01/28 11:52:03
House Of Flying Daggers
(Bear in mind I haven't seen CT,HD nor Hero).
Weak. A vacuous shell of a potentially great movie. Stylistically it was good, although few parts were as aesthetically striking as the bamboo forest. The OTT action scenes were good and entertaining too. However, the pontentially gripping storyline was wasted and badly executed. The basic story itself was, as a basic story, very good, BUT the way it was presented was so banal and crude (the explanation just after they are both captured at the house, for example), with simple, child-like dialogue, that it's potential was wasted. This could have been a very slickly presented intriguing medieval Japanase love-story-cum-intellectual-thriller with a captivating focus on duplicity, betrayal, secrets, love between warring factions. But disappointingly, it wasn't, in the slightest.
 Meet The Fockers
#1006 posted by pope on 2005/01/28 20:44:34
better than meet the parents. A straight up good laugh if you like embarassing sex jokes.
good movie to watch w/ a girl (but not her parents)
for a sequel, i was more than happy with it.
 :D
#1007 posted by Vondur on 2005/01/28 23:06:02
 Er
#1008 posted by Vondur on 2005/01/28 23:06:29
#1009 posted by - on 2005/01/30 11:35:16
 Scampie
#1010 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/01/30 12:38:00
If by linking that you intend to let us know that the movie is perhaps the most intellectually insulting thing ever made in Flash, then I'd have to agree with you.
 Scampie
#1011 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/01/30 12:38:55
If by linking that you meant to imply that the movie is perhaps the most intellectually insulting thing ever made in Flash, then I'd have to agree with you.
 Movies
#1012 posted by nitin on 2005/02/04 20:41:28
Sky Captain - Nice fun film with a very cool style. I love the look of the film, the retro fell is excellently exceuted. If it had few more spectacular atcion sequences or set pieces it could have been great, but as it stands it's still a pretty fun film.
Also saw Double Indemnity which has a dynamite script, especially the dialog. I love a good script and this is an almost perfect one (I still rate Chinatown as the benchmark). The performances are good too. The DVD is horrible though, there better be a newer release of this soon.
 Sky Captain..
#1013 posted by Shambler on 2005/02/05 01:06:27
Was pissed I missed that in the cinemas, looked like it would be, as you say, good fun on the big screen. Just not that inspired for the DVD =/
 Shambler
#1014 posted by nitin on 2005/02/05 02:49:48
I just got the dvd today, the quality is amazing so if you have access to a big screen and a decent sound system, it will still get the same feeling across.
 Movies...
#1015 posted by bal on 2005/02/05 07:30:05
Haven't posted here in a while...
Howl's Moving Castle - Well, if you liked other Miyazaki movies, this one is definatly recomended, not his best, but very very enjoyable like most of his movies. Great art, great animation, fun characters.
I loved it obviously... ^_____^
Kung Fu Hustle - Newest Stephen Chow movies, lots of very exagerated silly martial arts with funky techniques and stupid characters. Good entertainement, especially if you like his other movies (Shaolin Soccer, God of Cookery, etc). The CGI is a bit weak at times, but didn't really bother me so much.
Dead Leaves - This is some crazy 50 minute animation video that was released on dvd a while back, lots of violence and sex, some very cool animation and funky designs. (kinda has an american animation style going). Very fun, just don't watch this with your kids. =)
Oh and one of the characters has a giant drill instead of a penis... �_�
Alexander - Hmmm, this movie really didn't do much to me, I didn't love it, and didn't hate it... Never really got too bored during the 3 hours, but wasn't so excited either. Probably more believable than stuff like Troy, but maybe not quite as entertaining.
Angelina Jolies role in this is actually pretty cool.
Oh and the views of Babylon are pretty impressive, some good brushwork there. =)
Danny the Dog (called Unleashed in the US) - Got invited for the premiere of this, Jet Li was in the theatre and all, yay. Probably his best occidental movie (which isn't too hard considering all his hollywood movies are utter shite). Some stylish action and nice atmosphere (cool music by Massive Attack). Only recommended to people who like martial arts movies I guess.
|
 |
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|