 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
from dat shot perspective the map itself looks a bit dull , in kind of texture set
that rune texture(red-ish) added here and there would do the job Advice:
Trim-trimmings-trim Trim-trimmings-trim Trim-trim-trimmoo, I've got an important message for you... If you don't break up the textures on the wall more, it might slightly suck, David Cameron's a whore. But seriously though, it looks really cool, love the tone. How in the world do you guys see anything in that screen shot? From that distance and with all that fog I think you can assume that whatever detail there is can't be seen.
It is a little on the monochrome side - that's intentional. There was more color six months ago but people said it didn't fit in or something. Whatever it looks like now is how it stays. I have no desire to make those kind of changes. Yesterday I wasted hours trying to figure out why monsters didn't fall when spawned. Today I added the new teleporter system (that I finally got working right). To do that I had to change one room from short and wide to tall and skinny, deleted 12 unnecessary spacer brushes and I replaced a door that was using about 50 tris with one that used only 24 and when I compiled the map the marksurfaces count went from 32029 to over 32800. So I've spent the last couple of hours fixing that. Does anybody know if there's a way to keep Netradiant from renaming all the target/targetnames when you copy and paste? we get the GIST of it Rick - gothic cathedral-like outdoor architecture, indoor Runic areas lit with oldschool spotlights, and lava! How could we not think that's sweet?
As for the technical side I'm pretty useless (other than bothering people who know what they're doing), but I'm sure someone useful will come along soon. I remember the moaning about the yellow lights,
and now people want it back. I like the look now, monochrome or not. People are strange. As for the NetRadiant issue, i have no clue... I had added this room about a year ago. It's a pretty important room, but I was never really happy with how it looked. This is an old screenshot from before I did the re-texturing.
Old Room I worked on it a lot last week end and I think it's looking better. Probably still needs some lighting tweaks. New room Different view is phenomenal!
And yes new room looks better but lighting could be less flat. new room looks MUCH better with the texturing. those windows and bricks are great. the outdoor spires are fantastic. just be careful not to make it TOO dark.
damn sorry Drew seems like I over-interpreted things again, as I always do.
New version of the room is a lot better, everything seems way more considered and detailed, including lighting and texturing. /Eschews gothic label I think the bricks look kind of small in relation to the huge scale of the room. I'd prefer if at least some parts of them could be bigger for a more 32ish style similar to the previous metal4_4 style.
Which is good. The new one looks better because the textures break up the flat areas of the previous one better.
Is there an altar in the middle? Looks very interesting indeed.. neo-gothik / medieval maps are always cool :)
Go finish this ! Looks pretty good.
I think I prefer maps with a higher contrast of light/dark lighting. Also I thing I would personally avoid large flat walls and break them up with detailing with protrusions or texture changes. large flat walls
Honestly, what do you mean? There are not any of what I would consider large flat walls in any of those last few screen shots. There are some that are pretty tall though. I wonder if it's something about the angle the screen shot was taken at? Here's an overhead view with an exaggerated fov. I didn't change brightness or contrast from the original, just converted it to jpg so I may look a little dark. http://quaketastic.com/files/screen_shots/Wish13_d.jpg
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |