I'm on the end of my map and I'm trying to get it realvised.

After the -th version I keep this error of some brushes that keep disapearing in some views. I tried everything to get it right, force to grid, reshaping but the error remains.

As I look at the mapstructure the brushes are changed from MapStructure to info_notnull.
I haven't given them these option, it just occured.

Could it be the root of this malviewing? 

needs Hammer ;) 

I thought it was mapping help..,
let's have another editor. 

I use the BSP editor, and I have to be careful and always use the Esc Key on my keyboard to de-select brushes before selecting brushes for an entity. If not, some selected brushes (not in my view) could get an entity applied that I didn't want.

I don't think you want to force to grid all your brushes after you draw them or clip them. First select the grid you want, like 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, units etc, and draw your brushes to that brush(grid) resolution, or clip to that unit resolution.

Brush entities that disappear while viewing at different angles may be due to being built partially out of your level. Large multiple brush entities that span a level could do the same. Giant sized multiple brush entities can be made though, that don't disappear. 

work with grid 1 for what?

force to grid? :\

This is the kind of tools "not to be used" 

than a 16x16 grid. It happens sometimes, but usually I keep the grid that size or bigger. And yes - as I am dragging out my new brushes they are snapping to the grid.
Also selecting another brush in WC will always de-select any other brushes unless you are holding the shift or control key.
Also WC has the ability to send any brush entities back to being normal brushes. Just select the entity and click on a button "to world". 

Yup, I usually use grid 16 and higher, but for clipping I sometimes go down to 1 and 2 units when making something over 50 faces.

Forcing to grid, not sure how that works, but if a grid is changed is the brush going to adjust to the new grid when selected? That might explain things.

And, my previous editor also de-selected as a new brush was selected. BSP is opposite and hard to get used to, but I'm managing. That's the main reason, I think, that people hate changing editors. Unlearn'id what they learned! 

I have this cave with sidebrushes of triangular shapes to make a terrain shape.
Some brushes fit well, others don't.
The ones that won't fit I force to grid on 1 unit grid. As the center of the brush is placed back to integers the outside can change.

The only way to avoid hom's of the sidebrushes was to change them all into func_wall.
Problem solved, signon calling to minimize the func_entities. 

what light and vis command you guys use?

mine:

e:\Quake I\quark\QTools\Vis.exe -level 4 -priority 0

e:\Quake I\quark\QTools\Light.exe -extra4 -gate 1 -addmin -range 0.45 -dist 0.8 

what light and vis command you guys use?

mine:

e:\Quake I\quark\QTools\Vis.exe -level 4 -priority 0

e:\Quake I\quark\QTools\Light.exe -extra4 -gate 1 -addmin -range 0.45 -dist 0.8 

Gotta try those commands out some time, I still just use -level 4 and -extra. I'm new to Agguire's tools. Been using something like "delay" "2" and "wait" "1" on lights, and stuff looks alot better.

Madfox, if you make all your brushes with the grid at 16, and move edges and points around to make terrain, everything should match-up at the 16 unit grid. No need to move something 1 unit. Also, if every brush is made and clipped on the grid ( grid from 1 to 128 units and larger), all brushes should be integer.

I played lots of your levels and can see brush points less than 1 unit, though. So, it's just something you need to setup properly in your editor. Trinca will write you a tutorial! 

..is the default behaviour just so you know. wait 0.5 makes the light cover twice the radius without increasing the brightness level, wait 2 halves it, and so on. so if you have a high light value with a high wait, it will create a small bright spot, whilst low brightness & low wait will dimly light a wide area.

although i confess i only use -soft out of those compile options, and -extra4 on the final compile. need to look into them a little more... 

roblot whould be a cool stuff... me making a tutorial... my English rockzzz :\

will be a peace of crap :p 

I use grid 1 quite often for details - building complicated door shapes to exactly match the texture, making buttons that exactly line up with the cutout in the texture. That sort of stuff.

I regularly use grid 2 when making ladders or handrails.

No problems, rarely get any error messages.

Radiant's Translate tool makes sure it all stays on grid. 

Didn't know that "wait" "1", I just copy other peoples stuff alot. Trinca you really should send out editor setup info or something. I think it would help. Some people speak other languages, so reading english makes mapping twice as hard. If I had to learn another language, like British or something, I'd never know what I was doing. 

vis -level4
light -dist 0.7 -range 0.7 -light 15 -extra -soft
ingame light wait 0.3

terrain maps.
I know it sounds weird, but I tried to make a triangular brush that fits exact on the 16 grid.
Normal triangel brushes always go off grid. So I placed the boundary on the 16 point grid and keep hashling the corners untill they fit on the gridpoint.
After forcing this brush to grid I used copies of it to make a large flat surface. Then I raised all the triangles and made them sloping.
By doing so, the centre of the brush gets offgrid again what results in these coarsed lines.
Then it tends to the compiler to show what's the outcome. Sometimes they match fine, sometimes it needs new forcing to grid.

I know this sound rather strange, but I was curious when I saw the original triangular brushes, with their angles of grid.
With good use of light it can be minimized.
That's in Quark6.5 alpha. 

Maybe try this.
1. First set grid. Brushes placed should snap to this grid setting when adjusted.
2. Place all the square or rectangle brushes you need. Oh yea, turn off texture lock!
3. Make the triangles you need out of the squares and rectangles, or slope the square and rectangle brushes as needed.

If the editor does this wrong, then it's giving you a hard time. The BSP editor does much more complex copy, paste, merge, and rotate of multiple brushes really well. 

Oh yea, turn off texture lock!

Has MadFox ever turned on texture lock? 

But only Madfox knows fur sure. It's funny, I downloaded Travail (great stuff)over a year ago and still have 2 levels to go. I downloaded Abandon (witchcraft was best)just about 2 weeks ago and finished it, only missing 1 secret level. Go figure? 

But only Madfox knows fur sure. It's funny, I downloaded Travail (great stuff)over a year ago and still have 2 levels to go. I downloaded Abandon (witchcraft was best)just about 2 weeks ago and finished it, only missing 1 secret level. Go figure?
you like an abandon better? :rofl: 

I thought it no question as I found no texturelock in Quark6.5
(I might be wrong?).

Also there is no compromise between the two mods, as the first is a project of compagnionship and the other a one man thing.

@roblot- here's a figure. It's a sideway underwater in amount/r2b2.
http://members.home.nl/gimli/amount.jpg
There are a few demo's on modBcom :
http://www.moddb.com/mods/abandon 

Gotta play some more of it sometime also. Must be gaming mood or something. But Travail is much better, and is almost as good as what I'm doing... Ha!

If texture-lock is on and you copy the brush just above the tunnel, then move it to the right, you'll have mis-matched texture tiling as seen in photo(unless that seem falls on the 128 grid). With texture-lock off, your terrain will tile seemless. Unless you want a staggard tile look for a reason.

I know almost nothing about Quark but you say you got alfa? At Quaddicted I've seen beta4 or something. Also, you might have multiple installs of Quark or upgrades that conflict in the configs of the programs? Try complete uninstall, including registry items in Windows(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE - SOFTWARE folder), maybe. 

when you make a room out of a cube, to make it hollow outwards (-) or inwards (+) ?
I would think outwards would be better because the inside of your cube would be lined to the grid. (?) 

Never use hollow maker: this is blasphemy !!! 

Really, I've always used it ...