News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Screenshots & Betas
This is the place to post screenshots of your upcoming masterpiece and get criticism, or just have people implore you to finish it. You should also use this thread to post beta versions of your maps.

Need a place to host your screenshots? Upload them here:
http://www.quaketastic.com/
Username: quaketastic
Password: ZigguratVertigoBlewTronynsSocksOff
File size limit is 128MB.
First | Previous | Next | Last
Two More Pictures 
I've added this little area this afternoon. It's actually the starting area. My map has more than 7,500 brushes no I may need to scrap some ideas and carry them other to another level. I haven't even made the silver and gold key areas yet.

I've also changed my image hoster since imgur blurs my pictures for no reason and they look like ass.

http://uppix.net/1/e/2/6162d433fd88317f079225969d3a0.jpg
http://uppix.net/c/6/6/f56a4e56184b90d4d838889a3af4b.jpg 
 
brushes aren't really a measure of how close to the limits you are. check out the stuff that qbsp outputs right after compiling (or use bspinfo on a finished .bsp file).

18087 planes 361740
65325 vertexes 783900
29085 nodes 698040
1743 texinfo 69720
56641 faces 1132820
58573 clipnodes 468584
15487 leafs 433636
64691 marksurfaces 129382
236371 surfedges 945484
127066 edges 508264
447 models 28608
96 textures 2493028
lightdata 1639628
visdata 863654
entdata 193675

vertices, clipnodes, faces and marksurfaces are usually the ones to max out first, but sometimes nodes can too. it depends on how you map.

in most (all?) modern engines like fitzquake, the limit for vertices, clipnodes, faces and marksurfaces is 65536.
limit for nodes is 32768.

these limits are actually a limitation of the .bsp format. to go beyond them, you'd need to use bsp2 format, but only the rmq engine can read those atm. (maybe directq as well?) 
 
limit for nodes is actually: nodes + leafs together must be less than 65536. (in some/most high limits engines) 
 
Thanks for the info guys. I'm used to Source and its brush limits so I've been quite careful with the complexity of my brushwork since the level is quite big and has a lot of detail.

It compiles well for the moment and I've only reached the node limit because of a leak, so I guess I'm good for the moment as long as I don't make it twice as big. 
 
sealing the leak will usually net you a lot more room to expand a map because the compiler can remove all the extra faces outside of the map which lowers all the counts (verts, nodes, etc...) quite a bit.

also, hl2 has an explicit limit on the number of brushes?? 
 
Yeah there's a certain threshold with HL2 you absolutely cannot go past, otherwise you'll get the awesome MAX_MAP_BRUSHES error in your compile window. The limit is something like 8,192 as far as I remember. This happened to me a couple of times, and there's also the t-junction limit that's pretty annoying when your map is full of func_detail.

As far as I remember displacement surfaces are counted as brushes with HL2 but I might be wrong on that one, I haven't used those in a long time. 
 
I always wondered why hl2 maps tended to be so small, I just figured it was to speed up loading time. I wonder why valve put in an artificial brush limit like that. Did the old id tools have a brush limit?

As far as I know, modern qbsp will accept any number of brushes, it will only halt when you go over a bsp format limit which would not be able to be loaded into an engine anyway. 
 
I don't know about the old id tools, but I do know that GoldSrc's tools had a similar limit, but 90% of the time you reached the MAX_MAP_CLIPNODES thing before hitting the brush limit anyway, if it wasn't the dreaded Allocblock:full madness that made me ragequit GoldSrc level design at that time.

It's great to hear modern Qbsp can handle a lot of brushes. 
 
clipnodes are one of the few things that you can reduce without impacting the map too much simply by filling in (or covering up) bits of the map that the player can't reach with clip brushes.
inset lights, unreachable terrain and such.

that said, i've rarely hit max clipnodes before hitting other things like max vertices.

if you do find yourself getting errors, http://user.tninet.se/~xir870k/tooltips.txt is a great resource for figuring out what is causing them. 
More Screenshots! 
someone post more screenshots!

I would but any screenshots I might post are from a map that's (hopefully) almost done anyway. 
We Want More 
tonynfish...

my maps as well are hopefully.
my coiling waterfall goes well.
http://members.home.nl/gimli/fall01.jpg
then my mr big got too big.
http://members.home.nl/gimli/big00.jpg
my torment is almost done.
http://members.home.nl/gimli/tor00.jpg

bleh! 
Sweet! 
shot 2: his ambient sound needs to be FEE FIE FO FUM, and trigger the earthquake effect when he walks!

It'll be interesting checking out all this new stuff, looks like way way more new stuff than your last release. 
Random Stuff... 
 
<3 machinery 
 
Third screenshot from Madfox gives me vibes of Descent 3, something with the lighting and layout. 
Compiling At Present 
 
o sh--

O_O 
Hehe 
Mike, screw your babies, have my babies ;) Those shots look fantastic, looking forward to playing it! 
Pixel Pimping 
it seems today is the day for pixel pimping!
http://www.simonoc.com/images/design/sp/its4.jpg
(large image 1.5Mb) 
Seriously 
this has to be the best damn year for quake. 
 
Was messing with TROR in an old, unreleased Duke mod of mine recently. Wish this Eduke feature came years sooner when I actually required it the most. :(

Screenshot~ 
 
The balcony portion? Is that made out of sprites? 
 
oic, tror = true room over room, so that is proper geometry then. i'm surprised it took so long to do... it was the main reason I went for quake mapping over door/duke3d. :P 
 
uh, heh door = doom, but that's pretty obvious. 
Haha! 
I remember using sprites and sector over sector (which wasn't necessarily over, and could be in exactly the same place just entered from different angles iirc) in duke3d! the entire engine was hax!

nice and tidy looking shots. And thanks everyone for all the great-looking Quake stuff. It's indeed shaping up to be a great year. 
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.