 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
It has been play tested and is pretty much final. I know that for many the items/weapons/whatever loadout will seem a tad odd, it is simply based on how we play 'em in the Backshooter's servers. I pretty much always tend to favor the Railgun and this one is no exception.
I hit what I beleive is the very limits of the basic Q2 engine here. I found that if I add just one more brush, even a simple triangle the bloody thing will not compile. Thus, it is not quite what I wanted in the end but what I had to settle for. Screens... http://www.backshooters.com/maric/78a.gif http://www.backshooters.com/maric/78b.gif http://www.backshooters.com/maric/78c.gif Download... http://quake2.abs.net/pub/maps/q2/marics78.zip so frustrating not getting time to read all posts tonite. gotta go sleep. workin all week long thru hols.
just wanting to complement vondur on his new q3 "conversion" of his own map. also speedy for the same. Go see, go see -- http://www.planetquake.com/biff
nice looking map there, busy looking but brushwork looks good. I take it you havent done the lighting yet? And it does look a bit flat from those shots.
and very nice clean site too. You can thank Vondur for that layout, and GomJabbar for the code. Head back and check out the art page, btw -- got some goodies up there =)
As far as the q3 map is concerned, nitin -- those pics were taken after a test compile. The map is lit, and will look better after a full compile. Tnanks for the comments =) in this new UT ctf map : here
general consensus seems to be that it doesnt play well or run well, but it does look amazing. <a href="http://www.ina-community.com/forums/showthread.php?s=7193a839cca4ab0b1f8d95880ecb008e&threadid=285359&perpage=30&pagenumber=1"></a>
in this new UT ctf map : here
general consensus seems to be that it doesnt play well or run well, but it does look amazing. just go to planeunreal.com and check out the news item about CTF-skorbut.
and I didnt double post, I just refreshed the page once. Yes, the general consensus is correct, it neither runs nor plays well at all. In fact it take about 4-5 minutes for the thing to load. I actually thought that it lock-up my PC... nope, when left alone for long enough it finally loads and launches.
It has pretty ok atmosphere but I have seen what I consider to be quite a lot more interesting atmosphere in UT2003 already. The page cannot be displayed
The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please try the following: Click the Refresh button, or try again later. If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly. To check your connection settings, click the Tools menu, and then click Internet Options. On the Connections tab, click Settings. The settings should match those provided by your local area network (LAN) administrator or Internet service provider (ISP). If your Network Administrator has enabled it, Microsoft Windows can examine your network and automatically discover network connection settings. If you would like Windows to try and discover them, click Detect Network Settings Some sites require 128-bit connection security. Click the Help menu and then click About Internet Explorer to determine what strength security you have installed. If you are trying to reach a secure site, make sure your Security settings can support it. Click the Tools menu, and then click Internet Options. On the Advanced tab, scroll to the Security section and check settings for SSL 2.0, SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, PCT 1.0. Click the Back button to try another link. Cannot find server or DNS Error Internet Explorer
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |