#791 posted by pushplay on 2004/10/17 02:35:12
Triggermen - A light hearted ganster film shot on a low budget. It's pretty entertaining and has an excellent soundtrack. The characters are definitely what makes it worth watching, though the ending is a little weak. Everything wraps up too neatly.
After the Apocalypse - Saw it at the Edmonton Film Festival. Takes place after WW3 featuring a bunch of people trying to get by without any verbal communication. Shot in b/w on a shoestring budget, with absolutely no dialog. Not a single line. I liked it, but there's no chance you'll ever see it so hah!
Arrested Development - Nitin, the best way to decide for yourself is to grab a torrent and watch an episode. The style is fresh and I think the jokes are pretty damn funny. A friend of mine thought the jokes were tired, but I don't see it. Also, if you grab the first episode, it did improve as it went but should give you a good idea. If you grab a later episode... well some jokes are only funny because of what happened earlier. So I guess you can't win.
 Pushplay
#792 posted by nitin on 2004/10/17 06:27:58
fair enough, but in your opinion is it even enough over the whole season or is it patchy like a lot of shows?
 Nitin
#793 posted by Zwiffle on 2004/10/17 11:24:39
IMO, that show is kind of like Seinfeld. A whole bunch of unrelated crazy shit happens, and then somehow comes together at the end. It's also kind of wierd, they got this big wierd incest story going on, and it's just fuckin crazy. I wouldn't call it like hilarious, but I do feel satisfied after watching it.
 Nitin
#794 posted by pushplay on 2004/10/17 15:56:58
Nah, it's pretty consistent. The episodes pretty much flow from one into the other. It's not even a little like Seinfeld.
 Cool
#795 posted by nitin on 2004/10/18 00:11:37
I'll look into getting it then.
 Aladin
#796 posted by ProdigyXL on 2004/10/18 01:44:31
is
awesome.
'Nuff said.
 All Good Teenagers Take Off Their Clothes!
#797 posted by Blitz on 2004/10/18 02:57:03
[nt]
 Game Over Man! Game Over!
#798 posted by nitin on 2004/10/20 01:39:29
UK Teletext reports that British director Paul W. S. Anderson ("Alien vs. Predator", "Resident Evil") is to write the sixth movie in the "Alien" franchise, according to sources close to the film maker.
Newcastle-born Anderson, 39, has apparently been asked by Twentieth Century Fox to pen a new script featuring the creatures on their own (ie. no Predators). Whether that includes the return of Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) however is unknown.
The offer for the moment is simply to pen the script, not to direct as such although that may happen thanks to the success of AVP
 While I'm Here
#799 posted by nitin on 2004/10/20 01:49:35
some more stuff I saw :
Yojimbo - pretty good, has a coolness about it in terms of mood which is nice.
King of Comedy - I'm glad I checked this out because for a Scorcese film, this doesnt get much mention. I guess that might have to do with the lack of any signatory Scorcese visual pyrotechnics, but it's easily one of his best films. Robert DeNiro is excellent in this psychotic/comic role.
Cool Hand Luke - Excellent film, Paul Newman in great form and pretty good script. Also, I would have never thought this to be the movie behind some of the inspiration for the Coens' O Brother Where Art Thou.
Ran - Drags a bit in the middle due to the script but the direction is outstanding. The use of the screen is seldomly done so well. It's also refreshing to see 'real' armies in this day of CGI everything.
The Day After Tomorrow - Big, dumb and boring. I quit after about an hour in, despite some impressive effects.
All About Eve - Didnt like this much, seemed like a lite version of Sunset Boulevard, which is a much beter film.
 Re: Paul W S Anderson
#800 posted by Kinn on 2004/10/20 03:37:50
Yeah, it's a fucking shame, but there's very little art in mainstream cinema these days - Anderson will bang out a film in half the time it takes a proper director, make sure there's enough explosions and "bullet time" to amuse the braying hordes, and he'll do all this on the cheap as well, which is why Hollywood love him so much. The only director that can out-shit Anderson is Uwe Boll. (Watch the "Alone in the Dark" teaser trailer if you don't believe me).
 Kinn
#801 posted by nitin on 2004/10/20 04:07:35
it really doesnt have to be ART, Aliens wasnt an art film, Die Hard wasnt an art film but they were bloody enjoyable nonetheless.
As for Alien 6, given Mr Anderson's past scripts, I expect the final draft to be ready by the weekend.
 Alien 6
#802 posted by starbuck on 2004/10/20 05:07:56
aliens are let loose in a shopping mall. It's up to a sassy cop with street smarts to find an antidote to the aliens acid blood before its too late, and the aliens escape from Dunkin' Donuts to theaten mankind.
But all hell breaks loose and its time for an ethnically diverse team of civilians (including one comic relief character and one guy in a wheelchair) to block the motorway, so the aliens can't leave the city. They succeed, but a few of them die. The End.
 Starbuck
#803 posted by nitin on 2004/10/20 05:34:47
You should be making films, coming up with a script like that usually takes at least a weekend.
With people like you around, how can Paul W S Anderson compete? The world is too unfair.
 German Movie
#804 posted by megaman on 2004/10/20 08:05:28
dunno if youll ever get the opportunity to watch this one, buts its very nice. title translates into
"agnes and his brothers" by oskar roehler
im not sure what genre i should sort this one into - portrait/melodrama or sth., but anyways its a very intense watch!
 Semantics
#805 posted by Kinn on 2004/10/20 08:18:56
nitin: well, you know what I mean. I'm not saying Alien 6 should be a black and white foreign language film about an incestual thalidomide family or anything, but I'd at least expect that the director respect Ridley Scott's legacy and produce something other than the badger-felching cinematic offal that characterises every single other film on Paul W S Anderson's resume.
 Also
#806 posted by Kell on 2004/10/20 10:58:16
Alien 6? WTF happened to 5? Surely AvP isn't considered the 5th Alien film?
 Looks Like
#807 posted by Vondur on 2004/10/20 11:02:11
avp considered as 5th film
and people, stop speaking about alien franchise when kell is around!
 Oh God
#808 posted by ProdigyXL on 2004/10/20 11:19:37
They should of stopped at 3, at least that had some artistic value. 4 and AVP have just destroyed the franchise. I haven't seen AVP, and I refuse to, I don't want to loose any more faith in these movies.
I have the Quadrology or whatever and someone made the point that the 5th film could be a precursor to the first film. Like how the first alien ship goot there, did someone get their first? That kind of thing, that would be interesting.
 I Think
#809 posted by Kell on 2004/10/20 11:20:46
I think I am actually going to be physically sick :(
 Prod
#810 posted by Kell on 2004/10/20 11:34:24
exploring the origins of the derelict, its pilot and the alien species-as-bioweapon has been a perennial for fanbois like myself.
While I and a few others would be very interested in such expansion, I don't think it would make for a good film in its own right, because it would rely so much on knowledge of the franchise while at the same time trying to mask the alien behind the mystery of the first film ( essentially impossible now that so much has been revealed over the course of the films ).
I always believed the best source for Aliens stories, following the second film, was the graphic novels. An Animatrix type project could have been an option at one time.
With a new alien-only movie, I think the best approach they could have taken with regard the latter film(s) could have been the same as Highlander 3 ( still an awful movie ), i.e. disregarding the previous sequel entirely.
However, if AvP is considered canon by the studio and Anderson has been handed the project ( instead of Cameron and/or Ridley as was previously rumoured ) then all hope is truly lost.
Really, I think the alien franchise lost it when Weaver was allowed to decide she was its most important element. Which, just to clarify, she fucking isn't.
 Alien Resurrection
#811 posted by Jago on 2004/10/20 11:39:10
I don't really get it why people diss it so much. IMHO, it's 2nd best alien film, right after Aliens (the 2nd movie). I can't understand how could anyone consider the first Alien movie to be the best of them all, it was B-grade trash.
 Farscape - Peacekeeper Wars
#812 posted by Jago on 2004/10/20 11:46:29
I guess some of you might've heard of the new Farscape miniseries which is aired on Sci-Fi. Since Sci-Fi is no longer avaible in Scandinavia (yes, not avaible at all), I had to download the episodes off the net, but oh well.
Anyways, the websites say that it's a 4 houts long miniseries consisting of 4 episodes made to finish the story of Farscape (yes, John and Aeryn are brought back, in a sensible way). It was a very decent flick, but I was left wondering why the websites were lying about it. It's actually 3 hours long and consists of 2 episodes, 1 1/2 hours each.
 Jago
#813 posted by nitin on 2004/10/20 11:58:16
watch Alien on a big screen with surround sound, it's a stunning film in all respects.
Especially if you see it first and then the others (the chestburster scene and android reveal dont have the same impact if you know whats coming).
 Nitin
#814 posted by Jago on 2004/10/20 12:05:50
I�ve watched all Alien movies in their proper order and the first movie failed to do a whole lot of impact on me. To top that off, the latter movies have noticably higher re-watch value. I think that at this point, I've seen Aliens SE about 15 times, Alien 3 about 8 times and Alien Resurrection 6 times. I've only watched Alien twice.
 You Lie
#815 posted by nitin on 2004/10/20 12:20:22
no one could have seen alien resurrection 6 times and still live to tell the tale!
|