Strange Very Minor Request
#746 posted by
bambuz on 2005/11/18 06:39:40
could the "New X" text in the forum headlines list be a bit more saturated color. It's so close to white now that on some crappy lcd's (dell 1704fpt) it's hard to tell it from white. Thank you.
I'm In Two Minds About This...
#747 posted by distrans on 2005/12/29 21:12:21
...but the personal attacks coming out of IP 85.185.123.22 are starting to disturb me. We've had flame sessions and name calling sessions before but this stuff seems malicious.
As you probably know this IP has been banned from Wikipedia after much abuse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:85.195.123.22
I know it's only a temporary IP as
The People's Internet Inc cycle through IPs but they don't seem to be able to police there own.
Meh, Best Mapper is a stupid devisive thread anyway and awards for mapping/modding/PCs/TCs etc happen in the new year already anyway, so why not close the thread.
$0.02
Distrans
#748 posted by
JPL on 2005/12/29 22:58:32
I think the thread would not be closed, however it should not have been opened by "external func_ morron"... I just mean that it could be possible to allow only registered users, and also logged users, to post in, and create threads... It's a little bit harsh for extra users, but efficient against stupid people... We saw too much examples these last months :(
As well, creating account could be secured just providing a "real" email, that need to be checked automatically (i.e. you create your account, and you obtain in return a beautifull automatic mail reply stating that your account is now activated...) I don't know how long such a task need, but it is feasible for sure... I already saw that on othr website...
And the most important: metlslime, what do you think ?
PS: distrans, where are my background textures ? ;)
That Thread
#749 posted by
Kinn on 2005/12/30 07:10:35
the best mapper thread is a retarded thread started by a pathetic fuckwit. Some people decided to run with it and turn it into a legit thread (and thanks btw, for the nice words many of you posted about teh marcher), but I never had any intention to post in there myself.
Also ^ what JPL said about only registered users posting (and email validation in the registering process would be good too, if it's possible to implement)
Well...
#751 posted by
metlslime on 2005/12/30 14:41:28
I'm hesitant to give up the openness that we have -- it's nice to know that if someone from another clique (like mapcenter, or lvl, or quakesrc) can post here on a whim. Outsiders like that, which we should welcome, probably wouldn't create a whole new account just to post some simple comment. But there may be some changes I could make that would reduce spam without inconvieniencing people.
Openness Is Good.
#752 posted by
negke on 2005/12/30 15:41:45
but what's wrong with just making it possible for the moderators to delete spam posts/threads?
Metlslime / Neg!ke
#753 posted by
JPL on 2005/12/31 02:13:05
Yes, at least it would either discourage morron to post here, or discourage moderators to delete posts regarding the amount of stupidity posted these last days :D
OTOH I admit that the actual openess is good... I'm the first to look to other forum or Quake related website (Quaddicted, planetquake, etc..) and at least read what's going on... posting is an other story..
Open!
#754 posted by
Spirit on 2005/12/31 03:17:20
Quaddicted forums and comments are totally open too. And I'll leave it as it is as long as Shambler does not post more than 10 comments per day:
http://www.quaddicted.com/content/view/220/
>:P
I delete them once a day, about 4-5 per day. Openness > 1 minute work for me. It's something different here of course.
Metlslime
#755 posted by
Spirit on 2006/01/04 07:45:45
Change 2005 to 2006 at the bottom ;)
Spirit
#756 posted by
metlslime on 2006/01/04 13:34:10
thanks.
But it'll have to wait until my hard drive is either recovered, or pronouced dead.
Metl
#758 posted by
. on 2006/01/04 13:57:51
Really? I'd just include a "copy.txt" that you can edit anytime. That or have a tiny script that prints the range of years (i.e. 2002-2006)
Phait:
#761 posted by
metlslime on 2006/01/05 13:58:43
Whatever you said "really?" to.
Metl
#762 posted by
Spirit on 2006/01/12 11:08:35
Funny.
#763 posted by
metlslime on 2006/01/12 18:29:24
Is that from some "congratulations, PHP is successfully installed" type page?
RSS Feed
#764 posted by
Ankh on 2006/01/16 05:45:34
Would it be possible to implement RSS feed for func? I'm not familiar wit this stuff, but getting all new posts immediately to the pc would be cool.
Ankh
#765 posted by
metlslime on 2006/01/16 11:49:51
actually, i've already made one, though i never got around to polishing it and adding a link from the main page.
http://www.celephais.net/board/news_rss.php
Also, it appears to be broken right now.
Okay...
#766 posted by
metlslime on 2006/01/16 12:01:08
one of the news items had a backquote in it. I replaced it with an apostrophe and it works now. Have to look into setting the proper encoding in the xml tags, i guess.
Also
#767 posted by
czg on 2006/01/16 12:21:19
The RSS feed only relays new threads. Which happens twice per year if we're lucky.
#768 posted by
Ankh on 2006/01/16 12:31:53
hm - so it is not possible to get every post relayed with RSS?
I'm addicted to this board :)
Ankh:
#769 posted by
metlslime on 2006/01/16 18:01:35
well, that's a possibility, but i'd have to decide what exactly it would do. Customized feed per user? Should it uncheck the "unread" flag when you view the feed? Etc. Etc.
#770 posted by
Ankh on 2006/01/17 00:53:57
As for me it doesn't need it to be customizable it also doen't have to uncheck the unread flag. But this is only my opinion.