#7018 posted by gb on 2008/02/23 21:49:54
I also use Quest and have become quite fond of it. It has some little features like selecting 20 func_movewalls and setting spawnflag1 on all of them, and more stuff like that. Also texture locking which is useful, and texture rotating, scaling etc.
The key shortcuts are nice and configurable.
The screenshots from mine are very dark though. I mean _really_ dark.
The downside to Quest is the crappy UI, the fact it is no longer developed and some random crashes, I use the save function really often.
#7019 posted by negke on 2008/02/23 22:36:28
JPL: no, it's quakish :P
I forgot to mention, even though it doesn't have hardware support, the texture view is pretty precise and in combination with the (admittedly extremely slow) polygon mode, which let's you align multiple textures on different planes by visual offset, allows for very neat texture work.
gb: I never use texture locking though. I hate how it changes every face to some strange values even if you just move the brush slightly. If you have slanted faces or rotations, it totally screws up the aligning. I often pressed it by accident only to find out later on when a good chunk of the map suddenly looked borked.
#7020 posted by gb on 2008/02/23 22:52:20
I often pressed it by accident only to find out later on when a good chunk of the map suddenly looked borked.
Haha, I know that :-)
I use texture locking for crates etc. when I copy-paste them. It seems to work for me. Anyway, the face mode (texture alignment) is rather comfortable, so doing it manually isn't too bad. But when I have 20 crates it gets tedious.
I was SO glad when I found out how to set spawnflags and targetname for multiple entities at once. ^^ The 3D view is rather comfortable I think, I do most things in that. Like selecting brushes and faces. Even copy and paste.
I haven't found out how the group stuff works, do you ever use that neg!ke? Does it let you hide or copy and paste groups?
#7021 posted by negke on 2008/02/23 23:18:10
Yes, groups are useful in large maps with complicated brushwork or if there's a considerable amount of DM/SP-only stuff. ALT+G opens the group window. Select some brushes (or entities), press ALT+G and "create group". You can change their colors and hide them. Not sure about copy/paste.
Btw. you can align multiple faces in the same plane with the regular face edit window. It always uses the texture and settings of the last selected face.
#7022 posted by negke on 2008/02/23 23:20:59
See here: http://quest-ed.sourceforge.net/doc/manual/questdoc.html
If you flag "s", selecting one brush from the particular group will automatically select all its brushes (then c/p).
Cool, Thanks
#7023 posted by gb on 2008/02/24 01:37:05
Useful stuff. So creating groups works like creating models.
Neg|ke
#7024 posted by ijed on 2008/02/24 02:14:18
Cool shots - SP or DM in mind?
Houston, We Got...
#7025 posted by gb on 2008/02/24 02:31:02
pf_precache_model: overflow
-> segfault...
bspinfo says I have 211 models, is that already too much? Isn't 256 the limit?
I could use some help here, I'm stuck until this is resolved.
#7026 posted by Drew on 2008/02/24 05:24:12
The brush drawing feature sounds pretty cool. Don't think I'll be picking up any new editors though, since I'm too comfortable with wc.
PS - nice shots, as always.
Negike
#7027 posted by necros on 2008/02/24 06:23:05
dude, that balcony looks badass.
Precached Models
#7028 posted by aguirRe on 2008/02/24 09:54:41
BspInfo only tells you about the brush models (e.g. doors) in the bsp, it doesn't count all the alias models (e.g. monsters) that in the engine will be added from QC.
So already 211 brush models is pretty much and apparently is enough to put you over the limit. With my engines, you can see how many models that are required.
I've just also noticed that the limit is 256 for precached models, but only 255 for sounds due to a bug in the server code.
Max Limits
#7029 posted by JPL on 2008/02/24 10:15:24
Is there a document that explains what are the maximal limit values in quake, like edicts, maxsurfedge, maxmarksurface, entities, etc... ?
256 Models
#7030 posted by Preach on 2008/02/24 10:44:41
Presumably the 256th model wouldn't ever display in game, as it would have modelindex 0, which is the invisible model...
JPL...
#7031 posted by distrans on 2008/02/24 11:03:17
...I started one ages ago, but each time I got close to putting it out someone released a new engine that changed the previous limits :) Some engines have remained stable with respect to some limits I suppose...
#7032 posted by negke on 2008/02/24 11:30:23
gb: You can save some brush models by e.g. turning all individual func_walls of room into one large entity (if visibility permits it) and trigger_counters as well as trigger_teleports in monster cabinets into point entities.
JPL, distrans: The standard engine limits are listed in the glquake-bjp readme.
Neg|ke
#7033 posted by JPL on 2008/02/24 16:22:55
Thanks a lot for the information: I'll check it right now !
#7034 posted by gb on 2008/02/24 18:59:09
Thanks, AguirRe. That makes sense.
It appears my rotating lift alone contains 133 "bmodels", 132 of which are func_movewalls.
Another problem with rotating stuff... all those movewalls will rapidly increase the brush model count. And it looks like they need to be brush models and not point entities.
Think about this: A normal rotating door might have 8 or 12 movewalls, plus the door bmodel(s). Four of those could already add 50 bmodels... then I tried to make all crates in the map breakable, which apparently is not a good idea at all... 20 more bmodels... that's 70... and then I have this sucker of a rotating lift cabin. ^^ All this is not counting the monsters.
So it's rather easy to have over 200 bmodels like that. You live, you learn.
Neg!ke, thanks for the tip with the point entities. I use the Quoth spawning already though, so I don't even have monster trigger_teleports. I'm not even using func_walls yet, but that sure sounds useful.
This map has only 5 rooms and some corridors yet, btw. and only 6 or 8 monsters already placed. And wham, it breaks the model limit. ^^
Good opportunity to learn how to creatively save entities without being too obvious, I guess...
this game gets more and more interesting...
"monster Only" Teleport
#7035 posted by Ankh on 2008/02/24 20:03:56
Is there a way in standard quake to make a teleport that teleports only monsters but not the player?
Neg!ke...
#7036 posted by distrans on 2008/02/25 08:55:49
...oh good, there is a list of the standard limits. Might be useful at some stage...ta mate!
VIS Times/portal Numbers
I have recently completed a Q1SP map, which has roughly 20,000 portals. It is hence taking a very long time to VIS -level four it. Is 20,000 portals much larger than a normal map, and if so, what can I do to remedy it?
Thanks.
Well
#7038 posted by bambuz on 2008/02/26 23:06:55
Make some complex things func_wall entities?
Make sure complex geometry doesn't see other complex geometry (curved or dogleg corridors..)
Send a fast-vised or non-vised version to some mapper for testing.
#7039 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/02/27 00:11:56
Basically, either reduce visibility via level design (90 degree corners, etc), or reduce the polygon count (make trim flush with walls rather than sticking out, func_walls, etc).
There's really no magic to VIS, just lots of tedious work. :)
Speaking Of Vis...
#7040 posted by Orl on 2008/02/27 00:24:48
How goes the vis project with the map I sent you Willem?
Simulacrum
#7041 posted by aguirRe on 2008/02/27 01:05:32
Yes, 20k portals is very big, with older vis tools you wouldn't even be able to vis it at all, make sure to use an enhanced vis that can handle it (mine does and I think Tyrann's works, too).
Also, make sure to use a modern qbsp that doesn't create bogus prt files with a huge amount of portals, all wrong. Again, mine and Tyrann's should do.
For more info about improving vis times, see my ToolTips doc.
#7042 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/02/27 11:57:16
"How goes the vis project with the map I sent you Willem?"
My interest sort of petered out there, sorry. I got caught up in other stuff but thanks for sending it along anyway!
|