Hero
#655 posted by nitin on 2004/09/05 01:43:06
I just got it on friday, hoping to watch it soon, just waiting till I'm home alone so I can pump up the sound.
Hero
#656 posted by metlslime on 2004/09/05 06:05:23
good movie; but managed to surpass CTHD? I don't think so, but it depends on your criteria i suppose.
No regrets watching it; there were good fights, a nice story (particularly the way the first half unfolded,) and visually it was very stylish.
I Personally
#657 posted by nitin on 2004/09/05 06:34:29
thought CTHD was very overrated. A good movie it sure was, but nothing more than that.
The fight scene between zhang ziyi and michelle yeoh is another story.
#658 posted by Vigil on 2004/09/05 09:18:32
is vares based on the books?
Yup. Can't remember which book right now. Might've been a hybrid of several books. Haven't read any myself, but after seeing the movie I might try one of them.
Hero...
#659 posted by necros on 2004/09/05 15:25:32
saw it yesterday. excellent, and certainly up there with cthd.
Hero
#660 posted by cyBeAr on 2004/09/06 11:48:43
When I watched I thought it wasn't too interesting apart from the beautifull visuals.
I Polled My Family...
#661 posted by distrans on 2004/09/06 21:23:10
...95% said they loved Vigil, especially for that level where you have to defend the tomb of your friend.
5% said... Who?
Spellbound
#662 posted by nitin on 2004/09/07 07:38:59
this was almost a very fine film, but as it is it's fairly dodgy. The script is too weak and some of the dialogue about psychoanalysis is cringeworthy, even for a movie this old.
But, there's no denying the classy direction that's on display here. Keeps you watching despite all the flaws.
That Level Was Made By
#663 posted by metlslime on 2004/09/07 17:07:21
wright bagwell, and it was CALLED Vigil, not actually made by Vigil the mapper.
#664 posted by distrans on 2004/09/07 22:59:58
Joss Whedon Directing Xmen3?
http://www.chud.com/news/sept04/sept7x.php3
Being both a comic book and buffy geek, I for one, am exited for this. (nevermind the fact most of whedons angel episodes suck ass). At least so far, his comic run has been pretty damn good.
<-- Throwing Cards
#666 posted by starbuck on 2004/09/08 18:10:01
Of course, there's currently no script, and to the best of my knowledge no major talent has actually signed for the movie (and we know Halle Berry has little interest in returning unless she's in the spotlight).
Then piss off, Halle, no one likes you. He could be a good director i think. Oh, and GAMBIT GAMBIT GAMBIT GAMBIT GAMBIT GAMBIT GAMBIT FUCKING GAMBIT GAMBIT GODDAMN GAMBIT BASTARDS GAMBIT please thanks.
Yes
#667 posted by . on 2004/09/08 18:27:42
Gambit.
And
#668 posted by . on 2004/09/08 18:28:00
I was never a fan of Beast persay, but that might be interesting.
#669 posted by Zwiffle on 2004/09/08 22:54:43
I like Halle Berry. I'd like to see Psylocke. I didn't see X2 so I don't know if she was in there or not -_-
X-Who?
#670 posted by Kell on 2004/09/08 23:01:44
And when are they going to make a Lobo movie?
#671 posted by - on 2004/09/08 23:16:30
and while we're at the whole comic movies thing, just saw this interesting bit...
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news04/040908b.php
Finally, Comic Book Resources reports that "Allegedly, DC's lord of the seas "Aquaman" is getting the cinematic treatment, courtesy of producers Alan and Peter Riche and writer Ben Grant. They want this Aquaman to be a goofy screwball comedy. Their thought was, 'since he's such a stupid character let's play that up.'" He then warned me that despite his source's reliability, this is still just a rumor for now, so caveat emptor and what not".
Yet another comic -> movie destined to suck :\
oh, as for Halle Barry... she's not good looking, she has no acting skill, and really is only famous becuase she cried getting some token award and showed her tits in a few films. I'll be glad to see her gone for any film I may be interested in.
Scampie
#672 posted by Zwiffle on 2004/09/09 00:19:29
I can prove you wrong with 2 words: Cat and Woman. Instant gold.
#673 posted by - on 2004/09/09 00:24:59
...
so you're attempting a rebuttal on the grounds that she's such a shitty actor she has to play in a cheesy crapfest where she fully relies on her supposed looks? I guess she can pass for hot while she wears a mask and not much else.
#674 posted by starbuck on 2004/09/09 06:09:22
I guess she can pass for hot while she wears a mask and not much else.
she still looked ugly to me :)
Strabuck
#675 posted by JPL on 2004/09/09 06:13:30
Are you gay, or blind, or both ?? Even if she looks ugly in her ridiculous costume, it remains she had a wonderful bunny, and big tits woawwhat a girl.. That's enough to see the film.. grrrrr... and furthermore if someone tells me that she's naked in the film: I'll buy it :P...
Scampie
#676 posted by nitin on 2004/09/09 06:25:17
I thought she was good in Monster's ball, probably not oscar worthy but enough to show acting ability.
Well, I'm Just A Modest Blind Gay Man
#677 posted by starbuck on 2004/09/09 07:26:36
but going by feel alone she doesnt do it for me, honey. But masks and leather? Fabulous, I say!
Starbuck
#678 posted by JPL on 2004/09/09 07:36:08
With masks and leather: it will turn into a sado-maso sex contest.. he he he ...
That Sounds Like A Contest
#679 posted by starbuck on 2004/09/09 07:44:13
where everybody loses :(
|