Ricky
#6537 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/11 19:06:07
It just occurred to me; you seem to be using the -numpercent option in WC's console. That won't work, that's probably why you're getting weird printouts. I'd suggest using default settings or better, stop running tools from inside WC.
Rudl
#6538 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/11 19:07:36
No, vis is single-threaded.
JPL
#6539 posted by inertia on 2007/10/12 05:26:55
CDA really took 50 days to vis? shut up!
Inertia
#6540 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 08:39:13
Yes, it took exactly 1218 hours = 50 days and 18 hours of full vising... so when some people says I'm not patient... believe me, I know what is to be patient ;)
The big issue of CDA is the wide open area with bunch of brushes, and the terrain... I had several choppiness issue that forced me to put the latest fight under ground... otherwize it would not have been playable, even with aguirRe's engine (choppy as well)...
Well, I will not make the same mistake twice :P
A Better Question Is
#6541 posted by bambuz on 2007/10/12 13:42:20
is it worth even vising if everything's visible anyway. Does it reduce the visible faces much? CDA was unplayable on my old comp anyway. What are the differences in r_speeds between unvised, fastvised and level 4 vised?
Well
#6542 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 14:28:40
if everything is visible, I don't think fullvis or fastvising a map makes aby differences... The thing that make the difference are the "donnut" vis blockers, or something equivalent...
And concerning the use of level 4, sincerely I don't know...
But all of that is obvious and I guess everybody already knew it ;)
Yeahyeah
#6543 posted by bambuz on 2007/10/12 14:39:58
but I meant CDA for example. Was it really worth vising it? Did it help much after -fast? Actual numbers...
Bambuz
#6544 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 15:07:07
Well, in the wide open area, I guess it didn't helped much at all... while I cannot confirm it as I didn't have any idea of the final result (i.e difference of face numbers between fast and full vis...)
And I will not try to make the test just to obtain the results difference... The only good point is that aguirRe's vid tool is bug free for sure ;)
Bambuz
#6545 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 15:07:08
Well, in the wide open area, I guess it didn't helped much at all... while I cannot confirm it as I didn't have any idea of the final result (i.e difference of face numbers between fast and full vis...)
And I will not try to make the test just to obtain the results difference... The only good point is that aguirRe's vid tool is bug free for sure ;)
Fucking Double Post
#6546 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 15:07:33
Sorry for that :P
Well
#6547 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/12 16:14:49
a few func_walls and an XP Home Command Prompt later, and its been going for about 21 hours, says its 30% done, I think it says thats 20% of the time its gonna take, if that makes sense. At this rate it should be out Monday. Maybe. So thanks for the help!! Command prompt IS A LOT MORE STABLE THAT WC PROCESS WINDOW!
I've always been a click person, using a MSDos command prompt is something I've always managed to avoid. I've clicked on Wolf3D, Doom, Quake, Duke3D, Heretic...
Luckily I know to type 'cd c:\vis', then 'vis -level 4 -verbose sickhill'. Or else I'd be really scuppered, wouldnt I?
Just out of curiosity, what is CDA you all keep talking about? Which map is that?
RickyT23
#6548 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 16:27:11
I think it says thats 20% of the time its gonna take, if that makes sense. At this rate it should be out Monday.
Err, I would not like to discourage you, but, as aguirRe's said, vis process is slower and slower during the runtime process (i.e: percent value will not increase faster even if you have vis blockers somewhere...) so, be prepared to wait longer than by next monday...
According to my humble experience, when the percent value reach 50%, generally it cost twice the time already spent.... so you are far away to see a finished fullvis process....
Wait and see: patience is welcome there ;)
CDA FastVis
#6549 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/12 16:27:53
It makes a big difference already in the main room, but if nothing else it makes the end arena a lot better. Otherwise the whole map would be in view while fighting the big beasts.
I just made a quick fastvis and tried running it in Fitz on Hard, there were packet overflow almost immediately and then continuosly even with all the entity saving tricks in the progs.
So I'd say it was well worth it, although it could probably have been made easier with map adjustments.
Hence The Maybe.
#6550 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/12 16:31:38
Im happier with it now though. Atleast I can see whats going on.
I had some stuff - a monument with 3 spheres, a fork-lift truck, some decorative window frames. By turning them into func_walls I dropped the vis leafs from 11000 odd to 8087!
I think that made a big difference.
I tell you though, the sound of the fan over my processor is doing my nut!
Ricky
#6551 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/12 16:34:45
Good that vis works better now.
You can find JPL's CDA review+map here: http://underworld.planetquake.gamespy.com/quakerev051101b.html
Which Map Is CDA?
#6552 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/12 16:34:59
Im curious. JPL made it right? AguirRe has the source (just for his own personal devilment I'm sure).
What exactly is CDA an abreviation of?
Aahh!
#6553 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/12 16:40:08
Castle of the Dark Ages! Looks good. Cant be arsed with fileplanet though! I'll look for it elsewhere...
Try Quaddicted
#6554 posted by ijed on 2007/10/12 17:59:07
And for reference Google some of the ancient vis explanations on good blocking and how to have big open areas without murdering vis time.
There's a load of material out there, but it'll take some searching.
Rickyt23
#6555 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 18:02:24
Visit my website ;) You'll get all my maps then.
CDA
#6556 posted by Lunaran on 2007/10/14 17:59:44
Yes, it took exactly 1218 hours = 50 days and 18 hours of full vising...
isn't that the one where you took some buildings and took some trisouped terrain and put them together by carving one out of the other, or was that someone else?
I still get the night sweats about that story.
Lun
#6557 posted by Kell on 2007/10/14 18:37:53
iirc that was Mike Woodham, who used someone else's map as a carving tool.
*shudder*
Lunaran.
#6558 posted by JPL on 2007/10/14 19:04:24
#6559 posted by necros on 2007/10/14 20:26:10
you know what could have been interesting in that map would be to actually just use a custom quake farclip setting and fog without any vis (or just fast vis).
would that work?
#6560 posted by necros on 2007/10/14 20:26:11
you know what could have been interesting in that map would be to actually just use a custom quake farclip setting and fog without any vis (or just fast vis).
would that work?
Ah
#6561 posted by necros on 2007/10/14 20:26:21
god damn. :(
|