Ugh
#6518 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/09 20:24:49
Vis is not nice. Im running it with -numpercent, base went from 1 to 100, then it says Full. So far it just says Full. Dont like it! Will Full go from 1 - 100 in the same ways as Base did?
#6519 posted by wrath on 2007/10/09 20:39:18
pjw,
Oh, that kind of clipping. The 2/3 thing threw me at first. Right. I'll try that. Thanks.
Worldcraft 1.6
#6520 posted by Orl on 2007/10/09 22:02:14
While mapping yesterday, I did something and I don't know how to change it back. My mouse cursor became a hand within WC and all it does is scroll through the 2d views. I cant zoom in, nor add any brushes or entities. I'm stuck in this "scroll" mode. I have never had this happen to me before, and I don't know how to get rid of it. I've tried reinstalling WC to no avail. Anybody have a solution?
Orl
#6521 posted by Ankh on 2007/10/09 22:23:36
After checking in Hammer it seems that your space key is stuck somehow :P
Ankh
#6522 posted by Orl on 2007/10/09 22:34:51
Well, that was weird. Right after I posted here, I loaded up WC and the problem was gone. I'm almost positive my space bar wasn't stuck in any way. But at least now I know what to do if it happens again. Thanks.
Vis
#6523 posted by necros on 2007/10/09 22:42:13
quake vising goes through 2 'passes'. the first, base vis is what you get when you do the -quick. the full is the actual vising... it'll go up to 100 *eventually*.
depending on the level, it can take anywhere from 10 minutes to uh...2 or 3 weeks.
Yeah, Eventually...
#6524 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/09 23:02:30
When its done, I'll post my new level. Eventually. How long did it take to do the Warpspasm levels?
I Ran Em
#6525 posted by ijed on 2007/10/09 23:08:13
Overnight. Some didn't take too long, a handful of hours (5-10). The worst was Sealed City, because the vis blocking was so bad.
RickyT23
#6526 posted by JPL on 2007/10/10 08:01:32
CDA took 1248 hours... I hope you do not have wide open area into your map ;)
He He
#6527 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/10 17:43:57
Its one big wide open area with v. tall buildings!! Still going, hasnt said 1 percent yet...
Make Sure
#6528 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/10 19:48:24
you haven't blocked the vis console window with mouse or keyboard and verify that vis is still hogging the cpu.
Can
#6529 posted by ijed on 2007/10/10 23:01:43
You set windows priority for vis to high?
I think we talked about this but I can't remember.
I think it was the obvious answer - 'you can, but it's risky'.
Just Use
#6530 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/11 02:10:34
option -priority #, where 0=below, 1=normal (default) and 2=above. This only affects thread priority and is not risky in any way. You're probably thinking of setting process priority to High or even Realtime, which is usually a very bad idea.
In any case, you typically don't raise the priority for a cpu-intensive app like vis, you lower it so other apps can run.
This way you can vis in the background while playing a game or whatever and as soon you stop keeping the cpu busy, vis will return to full power.
You typically raise priority for apps that normally block a lot on I/O operations (disk/network etc) like copy-processes or similar. Then they will operate faster if you also have a cpu-intensive app running at normal priority.
Priority is not a gas pedal ...
Erm
#6531 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/10/11 10:58:02
Vis sucks.
I have gotten to the point where I have discovered the autosave feature! Yippee! It has only failed on me once so far (AAARRGH!!).
Like it because if I want to know how much progress has been made, if I restart the computer, or stop the app, then restart it again (from worldcraft prompt, with only vis selected) when vis starts (as long as it doesnt fail to read the saved vis file) it tells me roughly how much progress has been made!
I think Im pushing 13-14 percent!!!
Question:
Does the process window get to a point where it nolonger has any room for more text?
It often looks as if it has frozen!
Tried '-priority 2' but got bored with it (its pretty boring anyway).
What do you mean 'make sure you havent blocked the vis console window with mouse or keyboard'. How do you make sure vis is still hogging the cpu without pressing ctrl,alt and delete? Or is that what you would have me do?
Also, using XP, I always run compile tools from Worldcraft. Not being a programmer or anything, is there another way of running them?
If anyone can answer any of these questions (AguirRe), say something funny or say something to boost morale, it would be much appreciated!
Hehe
#6532 posted by Spirit on 2007/10/11 12:04:03
It's not VIS that sucks, it's mapping in a way that does not work well with Quake/VIS.
Yes
#6533 posted by negke on 2007/10/11 13:08:53
Large open areas with little vis blocking always result in long processing times. Sometimes it even takes days to get one single portal done.
Don't run vis from Worldcraft, run it in the command prompt with -v. You can break the process with ctrl+c to resume it later (safer than restarting the computer).
Ricky
#6534 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/11 15:23:12
So many questions ... Like neg!ke says, don't run any tools from inside WC, its console window is not very good. Use a std command prompt "dos-box" for builds.
If you're using the AutoSave feature to see the vis progress, something's seriously wrong. Don't do that, you'll just slow down the vis operation by constantly restarting it. You'll get plenty of progress info while it runs if you haven't disabled it.
In a real console window, you can block the process by e.g. starting to select text with the mouse, pressing Pause or other user input. Use Task Manager in XP to see that the vis process is using almost 100% of the cpu.
Finally, if you've only reached 13-14% after running for a long time, you're looking at ages to reach 100%. The fullvis process almost always slows down *very* much in the later stages and the final few percent can easily take 50-90% of the total time. Ask JPL for details if you want to know more about vis patience ...
You'll probably have to clean up your map if you want to be able to fullvis it before the year 3000AD. Remove/simplify/func_wall brush details, add proper vis-blocking, split map etc.
Note
#6535 posted by Lunaran on 2007/10/11 15:34:54
Use a std command prompt "dos-box" for builds.
he means the windows command prompt. don't go installing DosBox and trying to compile in it.
Does Vis
#6536 posted by rudl on 2007/10/11 18:52:35
support two cores?
Because Cpu gets never over 60% when vising
Ricky
#6537 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/11 19:06:07
It just occurred to me; you seem to be using the -numpercent option in WC's console. That won't work, that's probably why you're getting weird printouts. I'd suggest using default settings or better, stop running tools from inside WC.
Rudl
#6538 posted by aguirRe on 2007/10/11 19:07:36
No, vis is single-threaded.
JPL
#6539 posted by inertia on 2007/10/12 05:26:55
CDA really took 50 days to vis? shut up!
Inertia
#6540 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 08:39:13
Yes, it took exactly 1218 hours = 50 days and 18 hours of full vising... so when some people says I'm not patient... believe me, I know what is to be patient ;)
The big issue of CDA is the wide open area with bunch of brushes, and the terrain... I had several choppiness issue that forced me to put the latest fight under ground... otherwize it would not have been playable, even with aguirRe's engine (choppy as well)...
Well, I will not make the same mistake twice :P
A Better Question Is
#6541 posted by bambuz on 2007/10/12 13:42:20
is it worth even vising if everything's visible anyway. Does it reduce the visible faces much? CDA was unplayable on my old comp anyway. What are the differences in r_speeds between unvised, fastvised and level 4 vised?
Well
#6542 posted by JPL on 2007/10/12 14:28:40
if everything is visible, I don't think fullvis or fastvising a map makes aby differences... The thing that make the difference are the "donnut" vis blockers, or something equivalent...
And concerning the use of level 4, sincerely I don't know...
But all of that is obvious and I guess everybody already knew it ;)
|