|
Posted by metlslime on 2002/12/23 18:24:21 |
Talk about anything in here. If you've got something newsworthy, please submit it as news. If it seems borderline, submit it anyway and a mod will either approve it or move the post back to this thread.
News submissions: https://celephais.net/board/submit_news.php |
|
|
Phait
#6417 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/12/14 15:37:57
Jago...
#6418 posted by distrans on 2004/12/14 19:00:20
... release this level, then if you're still gung-ho on the theme, scheme & scenario then by all means make the larger pack incorporating a remix of this level. Worked for Kell (without the remix, of course).
Good luck BTW.
To Release, Or Not Release...
#6419 posted by Kell on 2004/12/14 22:07:01
you can continue to perfect a map for an unlimited amount of time, but yet it will never be perfect
A famous filmaker once said: "movies are never completed, they are abandoned"
When I knew I was nearing the end of Contract Revoked ( over a year after starting the episode ) a small part of me knew I could have gone on building it for the rest of my life.
But don't mistake wanting to continue because you feel there is more to do, with wanting to continue to put off showing it to others.
If you're happy with your map: stop building it.
I agree with distrans; release the single map and everyone benefits. If you still feel the episode urge...once more unto the breach dear friend.
Oooh
#6420 posted by Zwiffle on 2004/12/14 22:54:40
Kell's like a wise old chinese guy with a long moustache. contract revoked 2? eh??
Zwiffle
#6421 posted by Kell on 2004/12/15 01:33:38
Patience, grasshopper.
On The Cutting Room Floor
#6422 posted by Kinn on 2004/12/15 04:26:57
A famous filmaker once said: "movies are never completed, they are abandoned"
How very true. I personally feel that I "abandoned" Bastion to work on the other maps in the series, with the idea of releasing them as a complete episode, including a "Special Edition" version of the original map that more accurately represented my original vision.
That said, next Summer's First Anniversary "Bastion Redux: Shuffler Shoots First" Edition, (working title) will probably be the next time I revisit this seminal garrison of evil. It will have to wait as I'm currently knee deep in giant spiders on the slopes of the Marcher Vale - let's just say you might wake up to find a nice little stocking filler this Christmas ^_~ (or most likely, in the new year).
STM - An Instant Message / Email System
#6423 posted by Tigger-oN on 2004/12/15 06:00:57
STM, an instant message / email system I've been working on is in a BETA 1 stage. This means it is 'known bug free' and running on a fast server (the Alpha was on my home network and a lot slower). There is also a heap of documentation, a few screenshots and an FAQ :]
Anyone that had an STM Alpha login still has that login, however the old messages will look all messed up (I've changed some of the encryption stuff)
You can login / sign-up now at https://stm.lvlworld.com (its free and complete anonymous)
STM
#6424 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 06:46:16
Why do we need another one? ICQ, AIM, MSN, whatever are not enough why exactly?
Because This One Doesn't Require Anything But A Web Browser
#6425 posted by czg on 2004/12/15 06:50:56
no client!
I Give It A Try
#6426 posted by Spirit on 2004/12/15 07:04:18
20aa465d60027d37644dde1d8c2633c2:stm.lvlworld.com
contact me;)
The idea behind this thingy is great! I can use everywhere with no need for addtional software:)
Erm...
#6427 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 07:27:45
I can IRC and use MSN on my mobile phone (which is a very cheap model too). Again, what am I missing?
Erm...
#6428 posted by Shambler on 2004/12/15 09:12:01
CZG's got a good point actually. Like if you're using another computer that doesn't have shit installed, and the owner doesn't want shit installed.
Plus, if Jago isn't using it, that's another bonus compared to IRC!
Er, No
#6429 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 09:52:08
CGZ doesnt have a point. You can use IRC through a web-based client and you can use gmail, yahoo, hotmail, whatever for mail.
Yes
#6430 posted by Vondur on 2004/12/15 10:04:59
what about webmail? it has the same features and even more! maybe it's not that interactive but wtf?
Show Me The Web-based Client Then, Mofo
#6431 posted by Shambler on 2004/12/15 11:48:56
nt
Shambler
#6432 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 12:05:24
Etsi Web-sivuilta!
#6433 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/12/15 12:08:31
Tulokset 1 - 10 noin 1 790 000 osuman joukosta haulle irc web client. (0,30 sekuntia)
Fucking Awesome Doom 3 Case Mod
#6434 posted by . on 2004/12/15 12:08:35
I'm Sure...
#6435 posted by than on 2004/12/15 13:06:42
there was a web based icq client too. I definitely used it at uni at least once.
Nice One Phait
#6436 posted by starbuck on 2004/12/15 13:33:24
pretty stunning bit of work. Can't wait to see it finished.
Jago And STM
#6437 posted by Tigger-oN on 2004/12/15 16:00:32
STM is clearly not for you because you seem to have everything you need, but for some people (like me) STM fills the need - its web-based, go anywhere, secure, anonymous and completely spam free (and always will be spam free).
IRC, email (even gmail :]), ICQ, MSN and many others (like Jabber) all IMHO have issues, are not secure, require something other than a browser or a 'real' login or something else like banner ads etc. STM is non of these and 100% go anywhere.
So, enjoy the secret police monitoring your IRC chat, gmail giving you content based ads, MSN reading your chat logs and ICQ 'look at my pictures' request :]
On IRC And GMail
#6438 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 16:23:30
Althought I keep hearing that GMail has these content-based ads, for some obscure reason I am yet to see _ANY_ ads when I login and use GMail and I've been using the system for quite some time now. I could be the only one though, I dunno.
As what comes to IRC, if you want to be paranoid, you can always use DCC Chat which establishes a direct connection between the users, bypassing the IRC servers and thus monitoring software which could be possibly setup on the IRC server. You could argue that you can still sniff a DCC Chat session, but then again, your ISP can sniff EVERYTHING, including STM.
On Encryption.
#6439 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 16:27:36
I take it back, I see you are using SSL.
Jago, You Have Not Even Tried It :]
#6440 posted by Tigger-oN on 2004/12/15 17:36:07
Jago, you have not even tried STM (not that you have to). However for someone that has a lot to say, you have no experience with the product.
The fact that you 'can' set up a DCC chat in IRC means it is not the default setting. Besides that, who is to say that your ISP or any ISP between you and the person you are chatting with, is not mointoring your so-called direct coonection? Do you really think DCC is secure?
With STM, its secure from the start with nothing for the user to worry about other than adding contacts.
Anyway, enough chat Jago, either user it or don't, I really don't care. Feedback however is more than welcome :]
Tigger-oN
#6441 posted by Jago on 2004/12/15 18:57:20
I got myself an account to see what all the fuss is about right before I retracted my comment about encryption.
|
|
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|