I Like It
#615 posted by . on 2005/02/19 04:52:19
It's more prominent, and just overall better. Maybe the crate could use a tex though. And maybe a little 'slogan' or something below func_ "Mapping community" or somesuch.
For BG image, maybe something that epitomizes mapping or is more obvious.
Hey Nice One
#616 posted by starbuck on 2005/02/19 05:06:54
i like the title image too. I think the small crate would be better left unskinned. I agree that 2 crates in the image is too much, but I don't think any sort of mapping grid background picture would be very good, its so cliched. It might need a 'slogan' or something as Phait said; more precisely: something that describes the purpose of the board, as currently it's not immediately obvious to first-time visitors.
Visually, i think there needs to be some seperation between the "News / Forum / People.. thing and the main content of the title graphic. Maybe a black bar running along the bottom of the image, which the crate could overlap slightly. As it stands, where the menu bar and the graphic meets, it looks a little messy.
Just a few thoughts, I'm impressed with it though.
Heh
#617 posted by - on 2005/02/19 19:09:39
Crate there makes me wish the logo bit had a random icon put up there... just the cool ones... crate, cheese, pig, pimp hat, some of the game icons. would be alot of work I know, but it's a nice idea.
Not So Hard...
#618 posted by . on 2005/02/19 23:28:29
I wrote a PHP script that pulls a random quote out of a .txt file - one quote per line. Just put an image tag per line and it'll grab it.
Phait:
#619 posted by metlslime on 2005/02/20 00:11:10
Creating all of the high-res icons is still work. Though, i've sort of considered it :P
Well
#620 posted by . on 2005/02/20 01:14:45
If you really want a set, a specific amount, I'll happily design them. I need a break from the PHP learning/work I've been doing.
Neutral
#621 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/02/20 08:36:17
We would have to include the Neutral emoticon so we can accurately express the melancholic state that our anti-social user base tries so hard to repress.
Title Cannot Be More Than 70 Characters
#622 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/02/20 15:33:55
I had a title with exactly 70 characters, and Func still complained when I tried to submit it.
Duh.
#623 posted by - on 2005/02/20 17:04:09
The post icon counts as a character.
The Fallacy Of Your Argument
#624 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/02/20 17:12:50
But not all the post icons are mere characters; some are emoticons, and emoticons are actually 2 characters at minimum. Since that is true, the message should be something more like "Title cannot be more than 70 characters, or 69 depending on which post icon you use."
Bluh
#625 posted by Lunaran on 2005/02/20 19:05:34
Creating all of the high-res icons is still work. Though, i've sort of considered it :P
What's wrong with just scaling them up with width and height in the html, like on the front news page? It has a nice retro-gamey kind of style that suits this board well.
I think a site update tracker would probably be more worth the time though.
RPG:
#626 posted by metlslime on 2005/02/20 19:07:20
does that mean you got past the javascript, but the following page popped up an error message in red?
Metlslime:
#627 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/02/21 12:29:26
That is correct.
RECURSIVE ERROR: There Was A SQL Error
#628 posted by starbuck on 2005/02/22 08:01:53
Starbuck:
#629 posted by metlslime on 2005/02/22 16:22:10
that URL works for me. Can you give me more information about how you made the error happen?
It Just Randomly Didn't Work
#630 posted by starbuck on 2005/02/22 19:53:46
i can't repeat it, so it's probably not a real bug i guess. But if it helps, i'm running XP SP 2 with Firefox 1.0
AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH !!!!
#631 posted by JPL on 2005/03/04 02:31:50
The forum was down during the last 4 hours !!!! metlslime, go write this insult letter to the provider... hurry up !!
Eh...
#632 posted by bal on 2005/03/04 12:38:04
Chill, it's not the end of the world when a site goes down for a few hours... -___-
Bal
#633 posted by JPL on 2005/03/05 07:35:40
I agree, but since the server change, the site is down many times per week now, for many hours most often... and many much more time than it was before (with the previous server...) so WTF with this new provider ?
Ahem
#634 posted by bal on 2005/03/05 08:14:40
Yes, my point is, I'm sure it bothers Metlslime enough that he doesn't also need people on the board complaining about it all the time.
This may be a public forum, but that doesn't mean it owes you anything, Metlslime can do whatever he wants with it.
Bal
#635 posted by JPL on 2005/03/06 01:11:50
I know... metlslime is certainly bored with us (i.e. the "complaining guys...") :P .. But it's rather disappointing not to be able to connect to the forum many hours/mornings in a week... 8( .. Shame on the provider...
So now I really think metlslime have to write this letter he planned to write a few weeks ago...
Anyway... you have to admit the forum is less stable than it was before the server/provider change... end of the story... ;P
JPL,
#636 posted by HeadThump on 2005/03/06 09:50:10
You are a func_msgboard junky!
Nothing wrong with that, of course. Just thought I would throw that accusation out there. Now let us go back to the main menu and hit F5 every ten minutes ;)
HeadThump
#637 posted by JPL on 2005/03/07 07:53:03
You're right, I need my "Func-dope-dose" every day :D
So:
#638 posted by metlslime on 2005/03/08 15:18:50
was this 4 hour outage the only one in the last couple weeks? I haven't been online for the past 4-5 days, but before that it seemed that the uptime was much more stable after the server upgrade a few weeks ago.
Hmm...
#639 posted by bal on 2005/03/08 16:00:24
Have had very little downtime in the last week or so myself, definatly seems more stable.
|