One probably needs better, calibrated displays and dark rooms for the viewers too so photographing can advance, so that it can show realistic bright and shadowy stuff. These hacks are not good.

Interesting idea though, use all the bracket photos, since the CCD dynamic range isn't as good as film. It's just done somehow very wrong here. 

There was a siggraph paper that talked about taking two photos, one with a flash and one without, to get a crisp photo with accurate lighting.

Basically it used the flash photo for all the crisp, in-focus details, but used the no-flash photo for the color and brightness of the ambient lighting. Not a pro-quality solution, but this is software that the average dude with a cheap camera can use.

http://research.microsoft.com/projects/FlashNoFlash/ 

I nowadays never use flash. It just destroys everything about the original setting and atmosphere. I'm planning on moving to a F 1.9 seventies Canonet and 800 or 1600 film for dark environments (tested it a few years ago, there is some noise but the photos have atmosphere too). I don't really like B&W either. doh. How limited technology still is today. 

I really hate flashes, but I'm no photographer, and holding my camera still for a couple of seconds to get a long exposure of a dark scene is a pain in the ass and prone to blurry results. When it works, the results are way better though. 

I really hate flashes, but I'm no photographer, and holding my camera still for a couple of seconds to get a long exposure of a dark scene is a pain in the ass and prone to blurry results.

that's why actual photographers use tripods :) 

you can very often find a place to lay your camera on or support it against. Big tree trunks are better than tripods, since if you push hard enough (with an SLR the "shoulder" the lens and body form is good), it's completely standing still. Also, some table or ground and just put something under the camera to do the vertical alignment.

Tripods are never around when the situation comes and they are ~never robust enough. :/

I also like to use manual focus, since otherwise it's always fucked up (in this way only like 30% of the cases, especially if there's not much time.) Of course that's a pain in the ass with cheap new cameras. 

Tripods are always around when you always have one with you. =)
I used to do like you bambuz, find somewhere to push my camera against, but having a tripod is much much better, and alot more stable. 

For once BoingBoing is useful/interesting:
http://pingmag.jp/2006/07/24/japan-underground-photography/
(No, this is not that old photoset of the G-Cans project.) 

http://www.ironminers.com/ironmines/ 

Right down to the lens flares.

http://russos.livejournal.com/210363.html 

http://www.abandoned.ru/

More abandoned locations than you can poke a stick at. 

Why would you poke a stick at abandoned locations? 

It's better than poking a stick in crowded locations, which just tends to annoy people. 

Hey you! You at the other table. Pass me your salt. 

Fuck you. Get your own salt. 

Where the hell have you been?

Are you going to eat those? 

I'm like Det. Lt. Somerset, I'm around...

Just finished playing through hl2and hl:ep1. Valve knows how to make games. Jesus christ, do they ever...

In fact, they might as well come to your house, piss on your floor, and punch you in the crotch. "We're Valve - and you are all snivelling shits next to us."

And no, I'm done, though I've slightly touched one of them with the tip of my penis, and you don't know which one. Bon Apetit! 

piss on my rug, it's all good. 

http://skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=323935&page=2

Pics mostly at the bottom 

http://www.hfinster.de/StahlArt/ 

Flashes can be good if used right...it's not as simple as just saying OMG ALL TEH FLASH0RZ SUX!

Even the simple ones that come with most affordable cameras (that pretty much do suck) can be usable. You can always add something to reflect the light upwards for indoor use or put some plastic over to make it less harsh. 

Fortified city in the south of France:

photo galleries:
http://www.pbase.com/ouinpis/carcassonne_2004
http://www.pbase.com/dimasebaur/carcassonne_2005
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68259253@N00/sets/1194255/

huge panorama image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Carcasssonne_vieux_pont.jpg 

http://www.pbase.com/dimasebaur/image/46233040

This looks strikingly similar to the day of defeat : source map anzio.

http://www.nothing-2-fear.de/inc/images/maps/halflife2/dod/dod_anzio.jpg (best pic I could find of that particular street..sorry)

Cool place. 

That looks strikingly similar to *MY* Anzio level for MOHAA:Breakthrough.

http://www.celephais.net/cv/image.php?anzio2.jpg 

http://www.infiltration.org/index.html

<quote>Infiltration offers a mix of the practice and theory of urban exploration in areas not designed for public usage. This site is the online companion of the paper zine about going places you're not supposed to go. The latest issue of the zine, focusing on military leftovers, came out in June 2005. It's black and white, but you might like it anyhow.</quote>