Once You Have The Vertice
#3974 posted by HeadThump on 2005/07/31 15:14:17
correct, the scaling will work fine at larger sizes.
lol, hallowing is a horrible solution to this, unless you are dealing with large areas and a well contained surface (that doesn't split up adjacent brushes in the compilation).
Instead, I would start out with three seperate spiraling brush builds to represent the cieling, wall, roof than the way I started here.
My example above was an octogon, given it is all 45 degrees, the math stays easy. I'm working on a 12 poly sided spiral now, and to be honest I'm not encountering the problems RPG mentioned. It makes me worried I am missing something.
I avoid using the vertice tool, and instead I move the sides into position and cut. It is less messy that way.
#3975 posted by grahf on 2005/07/31 15:36:49
phait, doh you're right, but it's apple's X11. I suspect macradiant will always be X11 only unless somebody makes Aqua-native GTK2-wrappers or something, which will probably never happen. And you should upgrade to Tiger (10.4), stuff like Spotlight makes it really worth it.
Headthump, can you show me a .map file? mail me if you'd like: owen dot greenwood at gmail dot com
Okay,
#3976 posted by HeadThump on 2005/07/31 15:49:30
I'll send you the first map. The second isn't ready for puplic consumption.
Grahf
#3977 posted by R.P.G. on 2005/07/31 16:09:47
Check your Guilford e-mail, and then update your profile if that's obsolete. :p
My Guilford Email Expires In Exactly One Day
#3978 posted by grahf on 2005/07/31 18:49:53
but the mapping help thread is surely not the ideal place for this conversation. :P
I'm Close To Cleaning Up
#3979 posted by HeadThump on 2005/07/31 19:36:15
that map I sent you, Grahf. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night without straightening that stuff out.
Constructing Sloped Curved Tubes
#3980 posted by jsHcK on 2005/08/01 12:30:50
Thinking about recent questions posted here, I built an acending hollow pipe (that the player can walk in) spiraling around a cylinder. It worked out well, so I cloned it and mirrored it to make a hollow tube figure-eight. Again, no problems.
I am curious how any of that would be possible without using the vertex tool. Can curved tubes be sloped without vertex editing?
#3981 posted by grahf on 2005/08/01 12:57:51
I think vertex editing is the only way. In Radiant, edge dragging or skewing makes really messed up brushes that don't align right.
Do you have a picture or .map file of your creation?
Edge Dragging And Skewing...
#3982 posted by metlslime on 2005/08/01 13:54:20
i use them; they work in some situations; vertex manip works in others; you just have to know when to use each one.
Grahf
#3983 posted by jsHcK on 2005/08/01 15:47:06
I'm not set up to take screenshots in the editor, so I sent you the .map file instead.
Hey
#3984 posted by wrath on 2005/08/01 16:41:20
share the love. I'll host it for you if need be.
Err
#3985 posted by grahf on 2005/08/01 17:41:59
I meant that in this particular case of curved spirals, edge dragging and skewing weren't working for me. rereading my earlier post, that should have read "I think vertex editing is the only way to make these spirals." That was a vague blanket statement the first time around.
What Metl Said
There are some cases where skewing can be the only way to achieve the desired result (at least, in a sane amount of time). Especially in an environment like Radiant where the editor will not allow to to create invalid brushes while working.
A good example is if you want to create a curved, 12-sided pipe using brushes. We all know you can't rotate on any angle other than 90�, and it would be completely insane to try to move each vert into the proper position (even if that is possible in your editor)... the only viable solution is to skew and use the clipper tool to finish up, once everything is in position.
AguirRe
#3987 posted by PuLSaR on 2005/08/02 08:50:06
I have a small problem with light. There's always a fullblack stripe to the left from the brush that I use a lightsource (32x32x8 sized). The light spot is situated in 16-32 units in front of it.
Here's the screensot of it: http://www.quakemaps.nm.ru/misc/light2.jpg
Any ideas of how to avoid it?
the commands line is: light.exe -fast -gate 1
Try
#3988 posted by aguirRe on 2005/08/02 11:10:27
removing -fast and/or adding -soft or -extra4. If it's still there it could be that you're using an editor that requires enhanced texture positioning (e.g. QuArK or Hammer), then try adding -etp.
The last thing I can think of is that there's a brush problem (misalignment), it can sometimes cause bad shadows. Try manipulating the brushes and see if it helps.
The Sloping Curves Thingy
#3989 posted by bambuz on 2005/08/02 11:39:54
I did some stuff, like a spiral staircase (a map in progress) but a ramp instead of steps. Thanks for help from func people and czg especially.
So don't read if you already know.
Since it is a twisted surface, it must be constructed of triangles. (The slope is steeper on the inner curve than the outer curve, so they can't be in the same plane and thus can't be edges of the same face.)
Requires vertex editing in Worldcraft and isn't that hard.
That technique should be extensible to tubes and all the like too. I think maybe sometimes by skewing the brushes and sometimes by rotating them. One by one.
I'm off now.
But...
#3990 posted by grahf on 2005/08/02 12:00:49
skewing with multiple brushes selected in Radiant does wacky things. At least, it doesn't move them all as a unit.
It's Becuase...
#3991 posted by metlslime on 2005/08/02 13:27:28
radiant "skew" isn't really skew. it's more like "drag all the edges that belong to this face."
Help....
#3992 posted by ionous on 2005/08/02 17:26:35
Worldcraft error:
I was innocently mapping away, when i clicked on the camera button. There was no camera to be found now. It seems to have disappeared. Even when i closed the map, and then reopened it, no luck, still no camera.
What's going on?
Ionous...
#3993 posted by distrans on 2005/08/02 18:16:47
Are you working from the .rmf or the .map?
The .map does not contain camera info, the .rmf does.
Grahf...
#3994 posted by distrans on 2005/08/02 18:30:39
Just shot through a .bsp and .map, that might be useful, to your gmail acc.
Title == Spiral Tube
#3995 posted by ionous on 2005/08/02 18:31:54
I was working from a .rmf.
I just ended up selecting the entire map, and pasting it on a new map.
Thanks though.
Worked Around It
#3996 posted by ionous on 2005/08/02 18:32:19
Just copied entire map and pasted on a blank one, saved under old filename.
Thanks though Distrans, it was a rmf, have no idea what caused it.
Thanks For All The Curves Folks
#3997 posted by grahf on 2005/08/02 19:06:30
I gave up a couple days ago and worried about other things, but several of you have sent me interesting map files.
Distrans solved the problem actually, at least to my satisfaction. The answer is: the part of the pipe that curves around, cannot also be a ramp. there has to be a section of completely straight axial pipe that is the ramp upwards.
Now, another question:
Is there any syntax for the Radiant .def entity format that will cause a certain key/value pair to be added whenever I create a certain entity. Like, let's say I want all my func_doors to have a "wait" of 5 and a "sounds" of 4... can I specify these values in the .def file such that I don't have to enter them manually?
Ionus
#3998 posted by Ankh on 2005/08/03 00:36:44
I don't know if I understand your problem.
It happens often to me that I delete a camera by mistake when I press Delete while in camera view.
To create new camera. Just select the camera button, then go to any of the 2D views, hold Shift and drag the mouse. And you have a new camera :). You can have more than one camera in a rmf file.
|