hm...
tell me what you think. personally, i think the lighting still needs a bit of work to get a little more contrast out of it.
features aguiRe's super cool light program with the smoothing feature which helped out a lot with all the angles involved with the brushes.

http://www.planetquake.com/necros/levels/nesp16/nesp16_1.jpg
http://www.planetquake.com/necros/levels/nesp16/nesp16_2.jpg 

The Blue and brown just is not working. Try some of the textures with more orange in them to contrast the blue mayhap? Of course I was never a huge fan of the blue textures. 

yeah the textures look completly unattractive
seems the relation of scales could be better, but
cant see much from your screen 

necros: the textures are horrible.
and the geometry sucks too, its all square?? and you are trying to create textures with brushes, that wasnt the point of the contest 

those dont look like geocomp textures to me, if you use rivets and stuff to make textures and trims it looks too much like a normal map (but more boring) 

I thought the first shot was kinda cool. 

well, it's not really a true geocomp map, just that i concentrated on making cool geometry.

guess i suck though. 

I like the first screenshot too.

BTW on above, that cave level is quite nice looking! Very moody and atmospheric. Good use of blue fog/lighting, methinks. Hope it play well... It's too bad there has to be such a wide line between beauty maps and gameplay maps. I love the few that do both. 

Instead just put lights along the sky brushes, that way you'll get better lighting contrast, I recon. (Or maybe aguire's 2-skylight thing would help, i dunno, i havent played with it) 

On website here are shots about some levels in progress, is taking me too much time though.
Custom textures.
Custom sounds.
Models form the reckoning level pak.
Still in mind using the Knightmare engine. 

www.geocities.com/amaryl_1

also there are two former maps to play with standard textures though. 

Some neat stuff in there. It looks like most of it is corridors, though. Try mixing it up with some larger, taller rooms. 

bigger rooms still in progress and not compiled that is why I didn�t posted any.:) 

Make sure to submit it on here when it's all done with, I love Q2SP! 

http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/025998-10.html?

relevant screenies near the bottom 

funky indeed. :) 

http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~polycount/ubb/Forum2/HTML/007871.html?00007


Dont know how they play/run etc but the some screenshots look very nice, I like the last one on the bottom right. 

those ut2k3 screenshots look tempting, but i dont even have the game.

might buy it though...

whats the gameplay like in ut2k3? say compared to Quake 3? and do they have a railgun equivalent? :) 

I dont have the game if you were asking me :) 

Gameplay is good, I know alot of people around here may think different, but if you give it a fair chance, you will get rewarded. I don't like all the button mashing to activate the powerups (adrenaline) or the dodgejumping etc. But you can turn that off. The game looks amazing. There are some excellent custom maps around for it. The bonus packs also give you some great maps. There are good maps on the retail version, also some not so good. To me it is not quite as fast as QuakeIII, but faster than UT (I thought UT was crap, SP aside) Closest thing to the rail gun would be the Lightning Gun, which can be quite rewarding to use.
People would say wait until UT2004 comes out to buy, because it is supposed to have all the UT2003 content, which is fair enough. I myself would prefer to have both.
Find the right maps, Pump the bots up to Inhuman, or Godlike, and you'll be hard pressed to find a better experience. Then there is online play. Which is very good on a good server. Although, coming up against someone who has all the dodging moves down can be, well, lets say eye opening.

Would I trade my QuakeIII for UT2003?, NO!!, Would I like to be without UT2003? NO!! 

in the map pack, they play/run fine, most are very good, depends on personal taste of course 

While wew got a bit of a UT2003 flavour goin' on, check this out

http://www.ataricommunity.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=328633 

that map seems to suffer from classic UT2003 overdetailing :) 

But when you actually get inside, your opinion may change 

Distinctly inferior yet simultaneously highly derivative of the excellent UT. The graphics are nice, though.