 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
AFAIK it's an editor error; you shouldn't be able to produce such a thing. Therefore I doubt that you can fix it manually in the editor other than deleting/recreating the entire brush and hoping the editor won't do it again when generating the map file.
Also, at the time of discovery, the location of the brush isn't known yet. The extra plane will just silently be dropped with no side effects. and I forgot to mention that if you can enable some brush numbering scheme in Hammer that will add line comments to each brush/entity, you might be able to backtrack from line number to editor brush that way.
In QuArK I can do that and I guess GtkRadiant has something similar. Btw Kinn, your choice of emoticon is a bit odd and I forgot to mention that if you can enable some brush numbering scheme in Hammer that will add line comments to each brush/entity, you might be able to backtrack from line number to editor brush that way.
Hmmm...I don't think I can do that. Can any other Hammer users confirm this? your choice of emoticon is a bit odd lol, the wink? I dunno, it kind of makes sense to me, almost as if qbsp is taunting me with a wry "I know something you don't know" warning, without actually telling me the source of the problem. ^_~ I thought the little guy was leaning down to his left side to snort a line. I guess your interpertation makes more sense.
The classic examples of that would probably be Mixed face contents or Bad contents.
Somewhere in your 10k brush map, there is something bad. Go figure I've just downloaded the latest version and it seems to have support for Quake1. It loads
Does anyone know how this is done - there is nothing in the Help files on Quake1 texturing. Place the
For what it's worth, I would use GTK 1.4 or earlier rather than 1.5, a bit more messing around to get it set up, but far less buggy etc, and IMO, just better to use. I have a similar problem with GTK1.5. I have the
When I asked about it, they said to include the path to the Thanks, that's a start anyway.
Zwiffle: are you compiling from within GtkR or are you using some sort of 'tweak'? I am still using BspEditor with BspBuild and have no problems apart from using the 3D view, which is extremely slow (I have a decent system). Also, you have to be careful not to hold your finger on the forward/backward key because the keyboard buffer fills faster that the screen can draw and there seems to be no way of stopping it moving once it's started. Hence, I am looking at changing editors. Ok, i'm using quark and don't know how to get a "quake" key to turn into a key card.
It depends on worldtype value into the worldspawn of the map
"worldtype" "#" // Describes time of environment (changes appearance/name of keys) // 0 == Medieval (medieval) // 1 == Runic (metal) // 2 == Present (base) You can take a look at http://www.gamers.org/dEngine/quake/QDP/qmapspec.html for further details about QuakeC specifications.. really medieval?
Yes, I guess it can be considered as really medieval... but for sure it depends on the mapper's creativity... I didn't know that Vondur map for medievil game... it's a big surprise... Does he map with QuArK for this game ???
I do all my mapping in Notepad, except near the end, where I finish it with a praxinoscope.
It still produces better results than QuArk. ^_~
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |