#176 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/27 20:41:22
Stop digging.
#177 posted by JPL on 2008/05/27 20:43:39
you should open your mind....
#178 posted by Jaromir83 on 2008/05/27 20:56:24
Speeds: original UT was in direct competition with Q3 game at the time, so that is probably why ID wanted the mapper to take it down.
Any new map with D3 textures on the way? Thanks
#179 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/27 21:14:45
"you should open your mind...."
Imagination and fantasy won't change laws. They are what they are.
JPL
#180 posted by gone on 2008/05/27 22:26:10
you totally dont get
please read the goddaman license for the game and the tools!
you only buy the copy of the game to play - you cant re-destribute eiher the game or any part of it
Doom III\Docs\License.txt
scroll for:
2. Permitted New Creations.
Read it please. Open your mind and try to grasp the concept of copyright and licensing
Jaromir83
#181 posted by gone on 2008/05/27 22:32:43
And Q3 texture modification by Sock were in competition with what? (and that was like 3-4 years past q3 release too) IDs position of such things is very clear.
Any new map with D3 textures on the way?
yeah, sure: http://www.doom3world.org/phpbb2/viewforum.php?f=54
Not To Sound Like An Idiot
#182 posted by nitin on 2008/05/28 01:03:57
but this really should go to GA. I think there is still plenty to say about this map :)
ROFLcopter
#183 posted by inertia on 2008/05/28 02:57:42
*chop* *chop* *chop*
Intellectual property is an oxymoron. Get over it.
#168
#184 posted by distrans on 2008/05/28 07:05:16
...priceless!
#185 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/28 11:31:22
"Intellectual property is an oxymoron. Get over it."
This is what people say until they have some. When that happens it suddenly becomes very important. :)
Speeds
#186 posted by JPL on 2008/05/28 11:39:35
OK, fine, I read it, and I conclude that everybody herer now have all to erase his HD that contains Quake and all the fancy mods developed onto original Quake ! As well, for all the textures, etc... as customization is prohibited...
Interesting :P
My, Copyright, Property, Keep, Safe, Want, Mine
#187 posted by Spirit on 2008/05/28 11:45:41
Many people download or make music mixsets and even though that is a much more EVIL thing no-one cares. It's been a grey zone forever and people like it that way.
Some of the hot tempered posts might be due to people's job in the industry?
#188 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/28 11:48:10
"Some of the hot tempered posts might be due to people's job in the industry?"
No, it's more because people's attitudes towards the issue are wrong. It may be a grey area and maybe nobody prosecutes over it but it IS important. It's like when open source people blow gaskets over GPL abuses.
#189 posted by inertia on 2008/05/28 11:50:11
Willem:
This is what people say until they have some. When that happens it suddenly becomes very important. :)
We inhabit a situation in which IP is clearly inane, yet, we as creators of IP need the artificial monopoly of IP to get money and survive.
So, what I'm suggesting is that we don't pretend IP is morally OK, regardless of how we feel we need to use it at this present moment.
#190 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/28 11:55:32
inertia
I'm not getting into this argument as it's even more of a cesspool than the original one. However, to suggest that people's creations deserve no protection under the law is insulting at best.
EULA
This is straying even further from the original topic, but I think it's pretty well accepted (even in the legal community) that software EULA's are unconscionable and unlikely to hold up in court.
This is not to say that we shouldn't respect the developer's rights, but EULA's are getting more and more ridiculous as time goes on. Nobody reads them or takes them seriously.
I just love the fact that they all pretty much boil down to this: you don't own the product you just paid us money for.. you've bought the right to use it for a while, in the limited way set out in the agreement, but you can't do anything else with it, or resell it, or modify it, etc... oh, by the way, we can remove access or change the product at any time without prior notice or consent.
Sorry for going off on a tangent...
I Think
#192 posted by bambuz on 2008/05/28 12:20:58
when someone creates something new, it should be respected, and he should be compensated and given credit.
This map probably doesn't contradict any of the above, it's more of a tribute, it's not blatantly exploiting doom3 stuff, taking away glory or income or anything.
Since the digital world enabled making copies so easily without destroying the original, the laws that have been built around the traditional ownership issues have been lagging. I don't know yet of any good concept inventions (patents come to mind as one system but it's too heavy for this stuff) to ensure some benefit to the creator of an easily copyable thing.
OT:
#193 posted by Jaromir83 on 2008/05/28 14:23:37
Can you pls somebody link/send me the q3 radiant editor? I am probably too lame to google it, thanks. icq 259689233, email jardomir.b@seznam.cz, thanks a lot, sorry.
#194 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/28 14:32:09
Ffs
#195 posted by ijed on 2008/05/28 15:39:07
Talk about the map, stop whining about copyright.
Shambler's post said it all in a nutshell anyway.
JPL - you're wrong.
Rock And Roll Dude!!!
#196 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/05/28 15:53:43
All is fair in love and war!
If people don't like it, I'll personally kill them!
If they just want a fight, I'll still kill them.
If the policemen come to take me away, I'll give a good fight, they wont take me down easy, I might even kill them too!
Hahahaha!!
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!
Get Used To The New World Order
#197 posted by anonymous user on 2008/05/29 00:30:44
The days of fair use and sharing of creative work are over. Big Content has been pushing for years for ever more restrictive licenses and paranoid attitudes about IP. This all filters down as more and more ordinary people come to accept it as normal that all information should be jealously hoarded, and that the only legitimate form of 'tribute' comes written on a fat check.
All the people who are having aneurisms over Distran's use of the Doom 3 textures (which, incidentally, isn't the first map to have done so) I don't know whether you all work in the 'industry' or not, it's not really important. Please take some time to google 'The Right To Read' by Richard Stallman, if just one person opens their eyes to the real evil of this age this post will have been worth it.
Fair
#198 posted by steven_a on 2008/05/29 07:07:51
... If Carmack and co didn't like the community's fair-use of textures.. they'd sure as hell do something about it. (It IS fair-use, even though it may be plenty of them. A small community of id-software groupies playing an ancient release for non-profit. No harm. It's FAIR).
More-over, he probably wouldn't want you to ask.. For plenty of reasons, but basically because he is beholden to investors and lawyers, whether he likes it or not. Possibly forcing him to say "ummm... no" in public, him and us both lose. Hell, they ENCOURAGE mod communities. It's good for business, and good for gamers.
I'd love to see a TC with these textures and Dis' eye for detail ;>
#199 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/05/29 11:41:05
Dave's not here man...
Great Map
#200 posted by nitin on 2008/05/29 13:48:05
its pretty obvious from the start this will be a different sort of gameplay so you should adjust accordingly (obviously some people didnt).
Loved the look, the textures were employed better than in jpl's map IMHO.
Only nitpick was that bit where I got stuck, I seriously thought that area was going to lead somewhere.
|