Hehe
#1910 posted by DaZ on 2008/06/26 17:23:06
he makes a good point :)
I Disagree
#1911 posted by Jago on 2008/06/26 17:35:43
Installing and setting up a distribution like Ubuntu for basic computing tasks is easier than installing and configuring Windows XP for doing the same thing. Arguably, Windows XP is a 8 year old OS, but that is beside the point. Not to mention that several vendors ship computers with Linux pre-installed.
As such, the argument that whoever is using Linux is also capable of warezing a pre-cracked game does not hold any weight.
Yes, It Does
#1912 posted by megaman on 2008/06/26 18:52:19
Installing and setting up a distribution like Ubuntu for basic computing tasks is easier than installing and configuring Windows XP
that's until you run into issues. and you usually do.
#1913 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/06/26 21:30:50
Willem
#1914 posted by Zwiffle on 2008/06/26 22:11:52
I want my 20 seconds back.
Jago
#1915 posted by inertia on 2008/06/26 22:28:27
Arguably, Windows XP is a 8 year old OS, but that is beside the point.
Indeed, it is arguable - Windows XP was released in fall 2001, making it less than 7 years old.
Gears
#1916 posted by Kinn on 2008/06/26 22:41:11
why does everyone call it "Gears"? is "Gears of War" that cumbersome to type/say?
Anyway, can't spend all day chatting - I'm off to fire up my PS2 to play some more "God".
#1917 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/06/26 22:51:38
'Gears' is 2 less words than 'Gears of War'. We call it Gears around the office.
Hmm
#1918 posted by nonentity on 2008/06/26 22:53:11
is "Gears of War" that cumbersome to type/say?
y
Woot
#1919 posted by bal on 2008/06/28 13:49:12
Jimmy's Lost His Toilet Paper
#1920 posted by Lunaran on 2008/07/02 21:38:03
That Was Pretty Cool, Actually.
#1921 posted by pjw on 2008/07/03 04:20:24
I got through the first 12 levels, and then the game "encountered a problem" and I can't be fucked to start again from the beginning since there's no "load level X" or "continue". :p
Really nice use of simple physics and pathfinding to create interesting puzzles.
Jesus I hate him for using spacebar for restart though. Spacebar is cemented firmly in my brain as jump...
Half-Life 2
#1922 posted by Blitz on 2008/07/06 04:18:14
I'm replaying HL2 this weekend and it's really as great as I remember it being during my first play through. It's cliche at this point to say it's one of the best games of the past 10 years, maybe ever but it's just really *fun* I've played a lot of games and the majority usually have at least an hour or two worth of gameplay that you just hate and you grind through it anyway. The thing that struck me about playing HL2 again is that at least for the first 5-6 hours so far, it's been nothing but pure fun. Being chased through the city at the beginning, then through the canals, then the boat ride through the canals, then blasting zombies with the gravity gun in Ravenholme, it's such a pure god damn joy to play this game.
Ditto That!!! Ep 2 Is Also Ace!
#1923 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/07/06 04:21:37
Still think HL1 was better . . .
HL1
#1924 posted by rj on 2008/07/06 07:27:22
disagree on that. it was awesome at the time but i went back and played it after first playing 2 and found it incredibly frustrating in comparison. i just remember there being so many situations where you'd step out of line for as little as one second and die pretty much instantly..
i purchased EP2 on the day of release but still haven't had the chance to play it yet, kept crashing my pc. i need an upgrade :(
HL1 Comparison To HL2...
#1925 posted by JPL on 2008/07/06 09:05:41
.. makes no sense to me. OK one is so far better in gameplay, situations, etc... but come on, both have different engines performances, different texture set, etc... and have been released at different time, with many years of difference.
It is like comparing Doom and Doom3, or Commando with Quake.... and for this you can only have a personnal taste..
Game comparison makes sense when you are comparing games that have been released let's say the same year, and having more or less the same technology (e.g Doom3 s HL2, etc...): Let's try to compare apple to apple ;)
What?
#1926 posted by bal on 2008/07/06 10:06:19
I disagree, there's no reason not to compare games that weren't released in the same time frame, the gameplay has evolved, but not so much that you can't compare it.
I agree with rj about HL1, it's a great game, but there are really alot of instant death situations that are pretty annoying, they fixed that nicely in HL2.
Can't wait for EP3, want to see the Aperture Science tie in, and maybe eat some cake.
Jpl
#1927 posted by rj on 2008/07/06 13:55:30
It is like comparing Doom and Doom3, or Commando with Quake.... and for this you can only have a personnal taste..
i didn't imply anything else :)
it all boils down to personal taste at the end of things.
Bal, Rj
#1928 posted by JPL on 2008/07/06 14:32:52
Well, I'm just saying that I don't see the point in comparing a game that uis 10 years old with a nowaday game... not the same technology, not the same performances, not the same visual... so for me difficult to say yes, X was better than Y... when there is 10 years between each release... It is not the case for HL1 / 2 but, anyway, I guess it is more clear now ;)
But It's The Same...
#1929 posted by rj on 2008/07/06 15:18:10
measure of fun ;)
i'm not looking at each game objectively here, just saying one was more fun to play than the other.
That's The Thing Though...
#1930 posted by bal on 2008/07/06 15:19:15
We aren't really talking about tech/performances/visuals, we are talking about pure gameplay, and that to me is always comparable.
It's important that we do compare games, because new games don't always have better gameplay.
Bal Is The Truth
because new games don't always have better gameplay.
Exactly, and in fact in recent years this is especially true because people keep over-complicating things and trying to pack too much into one game.
Reminiscing about (and re-playing) classic games isn't just for the sake of nostalgia. I think to some extent people like myself are yearning for the simplicity and purity of the game mechanics found in those older titles.
Fribbles
#1932 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/07/06 17:58:39
I agree with you, kinda...
In a way I think the fact I like HL1 really god IS due to nostalgia! I just think that HL1 reminds me of when I started really getting into shooters! I remember playing Quake2 on my P133/16Mb, and being pissed off cause the coloured light's wouldn't work because I had nee 3DFX card. Then playing HL1 - first off it was the first game with a software coloured lighting renderer! (and one of the last)
And second - I think the most classic moments of my gaming career came from that game! The intro sequence, "we've got hostiles", and all of the stuff with the big aliens in the desert towards the end. AND the part's with the "assassins" - soo atmospheric with the footsteps and glowing eyes! And also I seem to recall HL1 having more play time that its sequels - the game is a truie epic!
But I also agree - there were plenty insta-death moments - like Distrans's last map!
I remember many occasions where I would be quick saving with 5% health, to try and take out 3 soldiers with a pistol and 4 shotgun shells...
But hey - like you say - it is down to personal taste, and nostalgia! In short I love all the HL games, and I'm really looking forwards to EP3!!! :D
HL2
#1933 posted by Shambler on 2008/07/06 22:26:15
Is what HL wanted to be, but wasn't.
HL
#1934 posted by ijed on 2008/07/06 22:58:48
Is Quake 1.5
|