 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
Make a shooter like q1 today, and everyone will label it shallow troglodite of a game. And it wont sell regardless of the advanced engine and pretty art.
People always want more and better. IMHO arent they more like traditional shooters with pretty engines?
I say a good game will be well received regardless of whether it is simple or complicated. Case Study and prime example no1:
Quake 1 =) Right on. Quake's accessibility, immersion and repeatable/extendable gameplay is why it was actually the first compuer game I ever bought and the first I ever played to completion. People always want more and better. Well...gamers always want more; better is so subjective...opinions are like assholes etc. etc. The problem is, it tends to be more of the obvious things, like more polys, more weapons, more detail, more of the same... If that's what petulant gamers holler for, that's what developers will sell them. Until they are, as id appear to be, sick and tired of it. The gamers are correct to always want more. You can't rehash what's already been done and expect the public to lap it up. Even if what you're rehashing is your precious Quake 1.
But more doesn't have to mean more guns, more polys, more blood. FPS games are made up of a lot of attributes, you could choose any number of them to do more in. And that's the direction that Doom 3 seems to be going in. Some of you guys are like old men pining away for an old flame who wasn't really so hot to begin with. You're not in love with the game, you're in love with the half false memory of the game. got anyone particular in mind?
gonna name names? :P I love the game believe me, not a "half false memory", whatever you think that is. Your also missing the point Carmack is making: Simplicity is good. "more" (of anything) is NOT neccesairly better, in fact its often worse. In most fields of design the "classic" designs are often the most simple, enduring, timeless ones. It's not Friday until I've pissed somebody off.
I didn't miss Carmack's point at all. "More" and simplicity are not mutually exclusive. They all sucked but...
Starbucks showed promise, nice bridges, the gameplay blew. Harbs well yeah marvellous, not being able to reach the weapons in the middle was a high point. Scampies, disappointingly, was actually quite cool. Totara Forest Arena for Quake! Could definitely go places. There are other simple FPS games other than Quake. In fact some of them are pretty recent.
And teh Carmack thing....I dunno what vision he has of simple, but I don't think having a "use" key is really the ultimate in complexity. Seems like he's going a bit too far there IMHO. The gamers are correct to always want more. You can't rehash what's already been done and expect the public to lap it up.
It appears as though you're confusing "more" with "different". i am not pissed off, far from it. I enjoy debate. =)
But do you ever just admit you are wrong about something? Sometines it can actually be quite liberating. BTW, i knew this conversation would degenerate into a debate about semantics. Most philosophical conversations do. =) I've got a craving for violence. I wanna see the most disgusting porn ever made. I want midgets taking dumps in the mouth of a voloptous blonde. I want animals, car batteries and home appliances. I want to see red hot fire-pokers showed up orifices I've never even heard of!
I'm available as a personal life coach by the way... The results of visioning wrath touching his toes
Never press the F5 key, or, have the above mentioned vision
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |