Nice!
#17640 posted by NewHouse on 2016/11/30 07:51:20
MadFox
#17641 posted by JPL on 2016/11/30 08:47:39
For some reasons I lost the source file of one of my map, hence I'd like to recover the map file by decompiling the bsp file.
I tried WinBspC 1.4, and it failed. It is working with some other map, but no with the one I am trying to recover.
So even though I am on Win7, I set executable properties to execute the file as in winXP (one of the possible options in the properties of any executable file), so that is not the problem.
I am just wondering whether the bsp file has to much complex geometry for the tool, and in this case what are the options to recover.
Is there any other available tool with better capabilities, etc.. ?
@JPL
#17642 posted by muk on 2016/11/30 09:14:31
Try and older version maybe. :shrug:
https://www.quaddicted.com/files/tools/winbspc12.zip
V1.2 is on Quaddicted.
Open up WinBSPC and go to Help > Help.
Read through the Help section. Namely Section 1. I believe No CSG would help if the issue is complex geometry.
#17643 posted by muk on 2016/11/30 09:34:26
also, what error are you getting when you decompile?
I just tried to decompile ad_swampy and got an error for the map being in BSP29 mode.
Me Too
#17644 posted by JPL on 2016/11/30 10:27:02
Got this message also.. tool is expecting a bsp v30, while the map is v29....
Need to retry in anyway.
#17645 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/11/30 17:49:32
is there a way to find leaks in hte map? or do i just have to manually find them?
In TrenchBroom
#17646 posted by mjb on 2016/11/30 17:54:02
When a leak is encountered from a compile, you can go to File > Load Point file and select your map.
Here a line will display and if you follow that line it should lead you to the leak. Of course a leak can happen for other reasons.
#17647 posted by khreathor on 2016/11/30 17:56:57
First thing you want to do is to load point file. You can do this in editor or in game. It will show you where the leak come from.
#17648 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/11/30 18:00:21
Thanks Bloughsburgh! i would have never found that leak on my own.
@Bloughsburgh
#17649 posted by Newhouse on 2016/11/30 19:42:07
Finally some good answers*
#17650 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/11/30 21:40:58
Hey, Can i compile 2 maps at the same time?
Im compiling my main practice project at the moment and it will take me another 3 hours to compile.(i've been compiling for 4 hours now)
JPL
#17651 posted by madfox on 2016/11/30 21:45:36
Send the bsp to me, I can easily decompile it in seconds,
if the map is a clear bsp.
Use winbspc12 on winXP!
#17652 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/11/30 21:46:12
The huge one?
#17653 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/11/30 21:46:55
ups sorry
MadFox
#17654 posted by JPL on 2016/12/01 09:57:31
Thanks, but it is not needed anymore: I found by luck an old CD-ROM archive on which I put the complete QuArK project of the map I have been trying to decompile... :)
#17655 posted by Newhouse on 2016/12/01 11:50:06
Thanks to someone how send me this link first time :
http://www.quake-1.com/wc16a-tutorial/
(btw one of the hardest things to google)
#17656 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/12/01 12:41:39
Last evening i tried to compile my map and woke up this morning and it had compiled the map. it took 10 hours. I opened the map and at one point there seemed to be an invisible line that would push me into the void letting me see the whole map from a distance. Why did this happen?
#17657 posted by muk on 2016/12/01 12:59:03
What tools are you using to compile?
It really shouldnt be taking hours to compile.
#17658 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/12/01 13:10:23
ericw's compiler
Detail
#17659 posted by mjb on 2016/12/01 13:17:59
Do you have a very large open area of your map? Is the map entirely boxed in by a large cube brush?
Another thing to try is to select detail brushes (Like decorative columns, wall detailing, decorations in general) and make them into func_detail brushes.
This might help compiler time as well as 10 hours is very abnormal for what I presume to be a normal sized map.
#17660 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/12/01 13:23:08
i have a huge outdoor area, i dont box my map and i do have some detail.
what about the void bug?
#17661 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/01 13:25:05
It really shouldnt be taking hours to compile.
If his computer is antediluvian, it might. What system are you working on, Naite?
#17662 posted by mjb on 2016/12/01 13:25:50
I am not sure about your issue with the void but that outdoor area may be the cause or at least a large factor of your compile times. Try to find more non-essential brushes to make into func_detail brushes. Depending on how huge, you may have to consider closing in that outdoor section or deal with the large compile.
#17663 posted by Naitelveni on 2016/12/01 13:40:09
I have a 2013 imac 2.9 ghz with 8gb ram.
Os is Windows 8.
i have to make my outdoor area smaller. :/
its too bad that big areas affect the compiling time so dramatically.
Func Details?
#17664 posted by Newhouse on 2016/12/01 13:48:55
|