http://www.strategyinformer.com/pc/gothic3/patch/21255.html?details=1

a couple of little things.... 

 

The comparison shot you requested: http://negke.quaddicted.com/images/g3coast.jpg 

How fucking gay do you look in those robes?!?! I thought the crown was bad enough....

But yeah that's a lot more what mine looks like.

Did I mention how much the day/night cycle and weather in this game rocks?? 

I installed the patch ... http://www.speeds.quaddicted.com/goathic4.jpg
neg|ilke yeah same shit, just more blur with the DoF

I cat help but notice such things
(and lame shoddy UVs allover the place and much more stuff that shouldnt be present in a retail product) 

Shambler: yeah indeed, but their stats are a few points higher than the fire magician robe I had before. Need to kiss-up the rebels a bit more (bore slaying them all) so I can finally buy the Paladin armor which seems to be the best armor in the game. Kind of silly really, I haven't even been to Nordmar.

Speeds: I agree it looks bad but there are more than enough areas that make up for it (where it isn't noticable). If one buggy view is enough to ruin a game for you, well... just go map Bitterman. 

I haven't been too. Winter stuff tends to be my favourite atmosphere in a game, so I'm saving it until last. 

http://www.golfquestionmark.com/ 

Yeah, saw that on RPS few weeks back.

It is good, but it's also unfinished :(

The physics are very intuitive, and the visual style is cool, if a little rough in spots. The only thing that annoyed me was the physics properties of the vehicle - too damn light to stay upright. 

then play this game (with sound!): http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php 

YES!! 

now, what am i going to to with the rest of my day? 

Now how am I going to spend the rest of my day? 

That's what I get for not refreshing. 

that's why Swedish games are so popular - their challenge is set at just the appropriate level! 

Enjoying a bit of this! Some maps leave a lot to be desired, I've been playing some low-G maps, which seem to be massive box rooms with crude platforms in and a few props, but the gameplay is fun. Primitive but fun.

I'll have to get TF2 soon though I think... 

While UT3 is definately not without it's faults, I have been enjoying this game a lot as of late (purchased it from STEAM a few weeks ago).

The bad: the UI (and especially the server browser) is horrible, the "consolisation effect" is definately noticable. But seriously, EPIC can make a game that pushes hundreds of thousands of polygons per scene at a stable framerate of 70+ fps, but the stupid game menu is jerky and slow? WTF?

The broken server browser might be one of the reasons for a relatively low amount of people playing this game, it's serious broken. First of all, it's only showing maybe 30% of existing servers at any given time and to top that off, it's misrepresenting ping times, when the server browser shows that I have 80 ping to a game sever, in reality when I connect I usually ping 50-55. For finding games you definately want to use SKUT3 (an mIRC addon) instead, you can download it at http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1461550

The good: actual deathmatch gameplay. One of the problems with UT2004 was the fact that it was very easy to get away from your opponent forcing a lot of fights to become long-range histscanfests. UT3 has had its movement toned down a little bit, which ironically made it into a faster game with fierce combat, the combat is a lot more about closerange all-out fights to the death.

The game is absolutely stunning for the most part (although there are obviously a few very average-looking maps), very highly configurable through the game interface and editing the .ini files and runs very well on moderate hardware. I have a C2D E6600, 2GB ram, 8600GT 512mb and WinXP SP2, which is pretty much midrange these days and I am able to play the game at 1024x768 with all world/texture details on highest settings and a stable 70+ fps framerate as long as I tone down some of the unnecessary effects like dynamic decals and explosion details. 

But seriously, EPIC can make a game that pushes hundreds of thousands of polygons per scene at a stable framerate of 70+ fps, but the stupid game menu is jerky and slow? WTF?

I bet you worthless American money that they're using Flash for the UI stuff. Seems like a new trend in gaming lately to use Flash interfaces in bigger retail games.

Willem confirm/deny? 

UE3 has it's own UI editor and system. From what I've seen, it's not flash based. 

. . . worthless American money . . .

It's not worthless - now everything I buy from steam is cheaper. 

It's probably Java, just like the shit Bluray uses. 

It's not flash. As Scampie said, we have our own system which is completely proprietary.

It's still under development so speed improvements should be forthcoming. 

if you don't have a clue, better STFU

;) 

Kept that one quiet mate :) 

So I got UT3 last weekend. I'll tell you the single most impressive thing with the game: load times.

HOLY FUCK! Those levels load in like 2 or 3 seconds. Literally. Considering that the size of the assets is probably very large, I'm truly impressed... and happy. Loading times (in games in general) have been getting pretty ridiculous even on the PC these days, so it's nice to see that they've put a lot of effort into getting those load times down to a minimal level.

I'm sure the fact that it loads in a lower LOD for stuff first helps, but even so, I can't imagine how they got it that quick.