i don't think this is a feature of stock quake because to do it in rub2m2 i had to change the code. 

Up/down buttons for every floor of the lift.

Should be doable in AD... 

r

I hate that lift 

Make the lift a secret. And there is an instant death pit under it. 

Make the lift a secret. And there is an instant death pit under it.

DoomII.txt: the only way to complete the level is though the secret area.

Anyway this reminds me. I have just finished Doom II, Map 19 "The Citadel", by Sandy Peterson. Overall it's a pretty fun map, but the only way to the exit requires you to go through a secret area (like what da fuq does "secret" even mean at this point?), but anyway, whatever.

This map is notable however, for containing possibly the worst level design idea I've ever seen:

At a certain point in the level, there is a little alcove containing a powerup, a Soulsphere. Now I dunno about you, but when I find a powerup tucked away in a little corner like that, and there are no monsters around, and I don't need the powerup, I don't pick it up. I make a mental note that it is there, and go on my merry way. If I need it, I can quickly rush back and grab it.

So, I proceed to spend a sanity-destroying amount of time wandering around the entire map trying to figure out how the fuck to proceed. I give up after a while and consult a walkthough on the internet.

Turns out the way forward is via that powerup I found earlier. If you go to pick the powerup up, you don't actually pick it up, instead - nonsensically - you get teleported to a new bit of the map, which is the way to progress. (And no, before you ask, it's not sitting on a visible teleporter, it's just sitting in an ordinary, plain alcove).

Yeah, defend that, Doom level design apologists. 

 

Had some terrible maps. 

 

 

When looping, please please use at least two or three. I hate falling off just to have to wait for it to go all the way around the loop. And falling into instadeath under it is not cool. Have fun DeeDoubleU.

Yes path_corners tell the train where to go, but remember that it is the location of the lower left corner of the bounding box. 

When looping, please please use at least two or three. I hate falling off just to have to wait for it to go all the way around the loop. And falling into instadeath under it is not cool. Have fun DeeDoubleU.

Yes path_corners tell the train where to go, but remember that it is the location of the lower left corner of the bounding box. 

double posting! :( 

Even if I will use an instadeath secret you would have to work your ass to get to it! 10 hidden switches and rampcirclejump at the very least.

Good idea to use two trains, will do. 

The func_door_secret is limited in that it only goes in two directions when opening. One could use the func_train to make an elaborate secret door, but it can only open once when you set the last path corner wait to -1. 

Could you use the angles key to allow for more directions? I seem to recall a Preach blog:

https://tomeofpreach.wordpress.com/2014/06/26/unusual-func_door_secret-angles/ 

Hi again,

Is there a link to acquire the most recent Quoth2.fgd file? The option I used was from Preach's Blog and while that is up to date, I don't see any mdl paths defined which causes just bounding boxes to display in the editor.

If I am expected to add the mdl paths myself I can do that but was just wondering if someone just had a quick link to the file.

Sorry if I am missing something! 

Which editor? 

TrenchBroom includes a Quoth2 FGD that displays models in the editor 

You have to make sure you point to the mod folder in preferences 

Sorry should have stated more details.

Using latest release of Trenchbroom. It comes with a slightly outdated Quoth2 fgd file than the one hosted on Preach's blog.

The problem I found is that the Preach Quoth2 fgd seens to not have mdl paths defined as they are in the Trenchbroom one. Hopefully that makes more sense.

Everything works...I just can't see the models within the editor. This is only a problem if I opt to use the newest Quoth2 fgd and not the one that is packaged with Trenchbroom.

Thanks for the replies! 

Okay, so I believe I have everything sorted. I just opened the trenchbroom Quoth2 file and the Quoth2.2 file and manually copied the missing entries across. Everything seems to be working with models showing.

For reference here was the problem I was seeing:

Ex: Envirosuit--

TB file =

@PointClass base(Item, Appearflags) model(":progs/suit.mdl") =
item_artifact_envirosuit : "Environmental protection suit" []

2.2 Quoth file =

@PointClass base(Item, Appearflags) =
item_artifact_envirosuit : "Envirosuit" []

The "updated" file is missing the model path and this is the case for all entity models in the editor.

That was my initial issue but there were only a handful of missing definitions so I just inserted them into the file with models already defined!

Cheers everyone, until next time! >;) 

it would be great if you could create an issue report on github and attach your file so that I can include it in future releases. 

I really have been meaning to get around to that too! So if you've done it already, with your permission I'd love to grab a copy and post an updated version on the official site.

Do the model paths cause issues in other editors? Or are they safely ignored? I don't know if I need to keep a 2nd copy online for users of other editors... 

It is great to hear I wasn't just missing something obvious!

I will be happy to assist with the updated file.

Here is the updated Quoth2 fgd:

https://copy.com/Q2AbvQX9DjQugqCj

There were only a few things missing (waterfall, effect pulse, etc). And this retains all of the model paths.

I do not know about other editors but I imagine if the path to the mdl files are completely absent from the definition file that it would have the same issue.

SleepWalkR, I will report the issue!