News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Mapping Help
This is the place to ask about mapping problems, techniques, and bug fixing, and pretty much anything else you want to do in the level editor.

For questions about coding, check out the Coding Help thread: https://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=60097
First | Previous | Next | Last
Haha, That Worked! 
Strange that by default quakespasm won't display more than 1 tele effects worth of particles...

anyway, thanks! 
Were You Using -pointfile? 
 
Health. 
So I'm drubbing through the progs dir with qME, and can't find the health box model. Am I a colossal blackhead and missing something? You be the judge. 
Search Health In Maps 
b_bh25.bsp 
Its A Bsp 
Maybe qme doesn't display .bsp's? 
Yup 
qME doesn't display BSPs. 
 
QuArK does! 
ALSO 
Noesis, Blender 
Gtkradiant 1.5's Vertex Manipulation 
I decided to play around with the vertex editor in GTKRadiant 1.5, and I noticed that there isn't really much freedom to move verticies as I saw in comparison with 1.4

This just looks weird: http://i.imgur.com/Z6kO8P4.gifv

Anyone know why this is? 
Yeah 
this has always bothered me. wonder if there's a way around it? 
I'm Not Sure 
but I thought there was a way to select two controlpoints by keeping the leftmouse down and surround them. 
Just 
installed Radiant to see.
It should be: press shift + left mouse surround.
Then both controllpoints move smoothly. 
Breezeep_ 
Yeah it looks gash, but what you are trying to get radiant to do is undefined.

Radiant does not create new planes or split brushes automatically in order to maintain brush validity after vertex manipulation, so in order to keep the brush valid it must move other plane points - and the results are about as useful as you would imagine.

Trenchbroom is a bit smarter in that it creates new faces as required. To be honest though I'm a diehard Radiant fanboy and get by with the clipper and edge manipulation, using vertex manip only on certain shapes where I know the results will 
Wtf It Ate The Result Of My Post 
"...where I know the results will be predictable" 
Clip Only Brush Entities 
If you build an entity entirely from clip brushes it doesn't usually work - I remember it being something to do with the bounding box not being enlarged by clip brushes. The workaround at the time I learnt this was to sandwich the clip brushes between thin regular brushes on opposite sides, so the clip lived within the boundaries they formed. Is this still state-of-the-art when it comes to making clip brush models, or is there some new compiler which corrects this automatically? 
It's An Engine Thing 
Doesn't check collision outside of visible area 
 
Is it possible to spawn a zombie that's laying on the ground by default, and that only wakes up when we touch a trigger, without changing the QC code? 
No 
The best you can hope for in id1 is to emulate it, like E4M3 did. 
 
What necros said. I remember pushing some scrags with clip brushes once, but they had to be part of an entity made by visible brushes and had to be within the bounding box of the visible brushes. 
 
If you don't mind it blocking weapon fire, just do a skip textured brush model? 
 
Would an entity made of just skip brushes work better? 
4 posts not shown on this page because they were spam
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.