Afaik
#14115 posted by ijed on 2014/07/25 01:23:55
It depends on how the geometry gets flattened to UV to create the light map.
The problem occurs most with diagonals, depending on the resolution of the light map. So setting extra4 will help it a bit, but still leave a shadow.
Either way, only try and fix it once the map is finished, since all additional world brushes will cause the light map to be recoordinated - which is why a leaking map is ok, because then light doesn't try to optimize the UV space. Meaning you also get poorer resolution shadows.
Well... I Fixed It
#14116 posted by - on 2014/07/25 01:30:47
After eating some dinner and thinking about it, I decided to split the brushes, and shifted their texture alignment 1 pixel horizontally (not noticeable) to force qbsp to make them each different faces.
Here's r_showtris of the bad lighting and the fixed lighting.
Looks like the lesson is "Throw more polygons at it until it looks good"
#14117 posted by - on 2014/07/25 01:32:56
ijed: yeah, that sounds about right and why my fix worked.
(as an aside, I was compiling with -extra4 -soft - gate 10... mainly because my compile still is reasonably quick)
#14118 posted by mfx on 2014/07/25 01:39:42
"Light After Vis"
What difference does that make?
I made a switchable light setup once, which was spawnflag 1 (start turned off) , lit and vised the map in that order, and the light was turned on... All the time.
So i lit it again, and the switchable light behaved like it should.
I Have A Problem
#14119 posted by mfx on 2014/07/25 02:03:13
with some trigger_relays (3), which are all triggered by a trigger_once.
They have different delays (instant, 0.2, 0.1).
When running this map in the rubiconmod from ijed, everythings fine. Even in quoth this works.
But in vanilla progs only the first relay gets activated, the other two not? Is my progs.dat corrupted or what is going on?
Its late..
Do You Believe
#14120 posted by RickyT33 on 2014/07/25 03:04:20
in light after vis?
Should Make No Difference, Or..?
#14121 posted by mfx on 2014/07/25 03:10:24
What i believe is something else.
Different Progs!?
#14122 posted by ijed on 2014/07/25 03:40:18
Don't jump ship! I'm sure the other map will be finished soon...
And looking at the code everything seems fine - I can't see any particular thing labelled as a fix.
I didn't apply any changes to the triger system apart from is_waiting, which won't affect SUB_UseTargets. But bear in mind this is code inherited from various sources.
I have seen the bug you describe in 1.06 so I assume someone did make a fix, but didn't comment it as such.
I could do a diff, but I don't have any diff software installed on this machine.
Mfx
#14123 posted by Preach on 2014/07/25 06:10:25
Can you e-mail a copy of this map to me? I'd like to investigate but it's hard to reproduce the specific issue you're encountering.
I posted a series of blog posts about how Quoth does triggers, but it's certainly very different code to the original, and contains behaviour changes. If you are running into a very specific bug in the original progs there's a good chance it's not present in Quoth simply because the code is so different, rather than a deliberate targetted fix.
If it's a behaviour change which avoids the bug, then I can't see which one it can be. One of the things that's changed is that multiple target, targetname and killtarget fields are supported, but that shouldn't affect a vanilla-built map. Another change is that an entity in Quoth can have a killtarget and still fire targets afterwards - in vanilla the code skips target if killtarget is set. But that doesn't explain why one would fire and not the other two...
Scampie
#14124 posted by necros on 2014/07/26 17:31:18
an alternative would be to put a skip texture on the offending world face and make a func_illusionary with the same brush without skip on the face. i've done that a few times and it seems to work fairly well.
#14125 posted by Lunaran on 2014/07/30 08:10:53
you know how a gap in the floor with a clip brush over it acts like monsterclip?
how do I make it not do that? is that possible?
#14126 posted by metlslime on 2014/07/30 08:19:01
try having a skip-textured func_wall that covers the gap.
#14127 posted by Lunaran on 2014/07/30 09:14:24
answer: a func_wall textured with skip!
Or A Skip-textured Detail Brush
#14128 posted by anonymous user on 2014/07/30 09:41:52
to save an entity
No
#14129 posted by - on 2014/07/30 09:55:02
detail brush is bad, as qbsp would cull the 'hidden faces' of the bit of the gap you want to see. detail brushes in q1 are not like q3 where they won't cut surrounding surfaces, they are like q2 where they are only 'structural brushes that vis does not consider'
Well
#14130 posted by anonymous user on 2014/07/30 10:03:32
You'd need to make it an upside-down pyramid or something, so that none of the faces touch any surrounding geometry, apart from the floor plane.
Ideally, you'd make the func_wall the same way, to avoid creating unnecessary epolys.
Like This...
#14131 posted by Preach on 2014/07/30 20:09:28
http://tomeofpreach.wordpress.com/2013/03/31/windows-in-quake/
Remember that skip will also block grenades and rockets, while clip doesn't, so make sure the gap is small enough for this not to matter.
Ne_q1spCompilingGui
#14132 posted by Cocerello on 2014/07/31 15:34:42
Does anyone have this? I need it because Hammer doesn't accept comandline parameters for compiling.
The problem is that latest one asks me to install NET. framework 4.0, which i cannot install. As far as i know, v1.0 and v1.1 only ask for net. framework 2.0, which i have. Does any of you have any of this older versions?
Yes It Does
#14133 posted by ijed on 2014/07/31 15:38:31
There's a small window in the compile dialog where you can type in every version of Hammer/WC.
Or you can just write a batfile.
Coce...
No
#14135 posted by Cocerello on 2014/07/31 17:59:16
* Ijed, the problem isn't to input the comands, is that Hammer/WC don't use them when you input them, at least those like -extra4 or -gate, for example, but uses them if they are -windowed -game xxx or -width xxx -height xxx or something similar.
A bat file can be a solution, i know how to make them, but what comands do i need to write into them? Just execute nomapversion.exe, light.exe, qbsp.exe, vis.exe in order one by one and relate them to an origin (.map) and a destination (.bsp, .pts, .lit)?
* FifthElephant, i have that one already, but thanks anyway. That is the version i was talking about that i can't use, i need one OLDER.
Could Try Pm Necros Instead?
maybe he has an older version on hand?
Cocerello
#14137 posted by ijed on 2014/07/31 18:25:06
Here's one:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rtxwxt9klgmn39b/compile_full.bat
Just edit it and replace with your map name and add/remove whatever other controls you need like -extra4 etc.
Cocerello
#14138 posted by necros on 2014/08/01 00:04:44
http://mobile.sheridanc.on.ca/~jonescor/temp/ne_q1spCompilingGui101.exe
no guarantee if it works or not. probably lots of bugs too. :\
how come you can't install .net 4?
Thank You
#14139 posted by Cocerello on 2014/08/01 05:29:03
Ijed and necros. Will test them with the jam right now.
* Necros, i can't install it because it needs xp SP3 and i think that it has more disadvantages than advantages for me.
Apart from that, the internet conection i use this last months goes down on random, sometimes just after one minute, sometimes it last an hour, not that i can protest, as it is free. In those circumstances, downloading something as big as a NET. framework is imposible, even more a SP.
|