Trenchbroom + Compilers
I decided to give Trenchbroom a try. It works great. However, I'm wondering if my directory setup is correct because there are so many programs out there.
In my regular Quake folder I got a 'Id1' folder. In there I made a 'textures' folder containing several wads. I also got a 'maps' folder. I added a 'utils' folder as well but when using 'ne_q1spCompilingGui' it needs all my compilers in one folder. So I also made a 'compilers' folder.
The whole compiling story is not clear to me. I've downloaded TYRUTILS and the files by Bengt Jardrup. I'm not sure what the difference is. Also, all compilers come with several files but it seems you only need the .exe's in order for it to work?
Bengt Jardrup also has convmap.exe. Is this the aquirre converter I see mentioned several times? I have to learn Trenchbroom better so I want to make the more complex brushwork in GtkRadiant 1.4 and convert that to Quake. According to the explanation I read I need to make an 'output' and 'workingfolder' directories inside the 'Id1' directory. This doesn't seem to work so I probably misunderstood that.
Any insight into the correct setup would be great. I read the Quake Wiki and I've found useful information using Google as well, but never the complete picture so that's explains the questions above.
You really only need a the vis, light and bsp .exe files. The other files are probably readmes and source files (for budding programmers).
I just store everything in my trenchbroom folder for mapping, texture wads, compilers and .map files. When you create the .bsp file all your textures are compiled into it so these aren't required to go into your quake directory. (plus it makes your quake directory cleaner).
As for Trenchbroom, I store it inside my drop box folder so that my work is always always always backed up.
Re: Ne_q1compilinggui
#13637 posted by necros on 2014/03/04 14:20:36
the output folder is the one where you are putting your maps to run.
so if you are making a normal map, the output folder should be /quake/id1/maps
the working folder can be anywhere. this is where the .map file is copied from it's original spot, and then compiled (the compilation process creates a bunch of files that are mainly needed only during compile time).
after the compile is done, the .bsp produced is put in the output folder.
Extras_r4 Mod
#13638 posted by madfox on 2014/03/05 01:07:18
I was mapping with the extras mod with the func_water lifting.
Now I'm breaking up with the thing called z-buffering.
It means that func_water brush expands out of it size.
So a space left out still gets troubled with the greyness of the func_water.
Is there a solution to this?
#13639 posted by necros on 2014/03/05 01:33:19
only way is to make two separate water brushes.
They Are..,
#13640 posted by madfox on 2014/03/05 03:26:34
the left one is rectangle, the front one square.
It is the outgreying part where no brush is.
#13641 posted by metlslime on 2014/03/05 03:55:35
try using my newskip tool, it has a *waterskip texture you can add to the sides of the water brushes.
To Be Clear...
#13642 posted by metlslime on 2014/03/05 03:57:30
first, do what necros said. Then, use *waterskip on the internal faces of the water brushes. So when inside the square, you can see into the rectangle.
Yeah
#13643 posted by ijed on 2014/03/05 04:04:07
The volumes will be correct (but can only be rectangles, like triggers) but internal faces you have to cull by hand.
So, uh, what Metl and Necros said...
Yes
#13644 posted by madfox on 2014/03/05 04:37:38
To my astonishment breaking both func_water funcions in two separate ones clears out the greying.
Another thing I learned is that a very thin brush above the big one conceals the visible watersurface.
Just trying to change e1m3 with a changeable water level, but the z-buffering wrecked the view in other places.
Skipping tool can work as the sides of the brushes are still breaking up.
FifthElephant + Necros
Thanks guys! So it doesn't matter whether I use Tyrutils or Bengt Jardrup his stuff? It just basically a matter of preference?
Convmap from Bengt Jardrup is actually Aguirre's convmap tool?
...
Convmap from Bengt Jardrup is actually Aguirre's convmap tool?
I guess you could say that.
#13647 posted by Spirit on 2014/03/05 10:09:01
What Mr Useless is not saying is that aguirRe is Bengt Jardrup's nickname. I would recommend using Tyrann's tools as they are actively developed, fast and have great features. Check out http://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=60967
Sprony,
Which compiler you use depends on what features the compiler has. I tend to use Tyr's BSP most of the time and I revert to Bengt's Treeqbsp tool when my geometry microleaks (it rounds vertices to less decimal places, plus I can never get the portal file to work with Tyr's utility).
Tyrann's Tools
#13649 posted by ijed on 2014/03/05 14:38:30
Have detail brushes and a load of other handy features.
Detail brushes make your vis time reasonable - recently I heard a case of a map taking half a day reduced to >2 hours by application of detail brushes.
Excellent
Thanks guys!
Starting The Player With The Axe
#13651 posted by Featheon on 2014/03/17 22:45:52
I would like to have the player start with no shells and the axe selected.
My attempt: I thought the easiest way of doing this was to have console run the command "give shells," but I could not get that command to execute from a .cfg file.
Is there a way to complete this task without compiling with QuakeC?
You Can Do It With A Hack
#13653 posted by - on 2014/03/17 23:18:03
Make an 'info_notnull' entity underneath the player start.
Add the following keys and values:
"think" "PlaceItem"
"nextthink" "0.2"
"touch" "BackpackTouch"
"ammo_shells" "-25"
This basically makes an invisible backpack item, like monsters or deathmatch opponents would drop, and contains -25 shells.
Otp:
#13654 posted by - on 2014/03/17 23:21:34
You don't need to do all that if the player is sure to have only the shotgun and axe and 25 ammo.
Rekt Once Again
Thanks
#13656 posted by Featheon on 2014/03/18 00:04:23
I was able to implement this within 5 minutes of the post.
Is there a way to suppress the pickup sound?
Nope
#13657 posted by - on 2014/03/18 00:18:35
#13658 posted by necros on 2014/03/18 02:07:14
if the info_notnull is right on top of the player such that they pick it up as soon as the map starts, does the sound still play?
Yes Sir
#13659 posted by Featheon on 2014/03/18 02:38:05
|