Just To Say
#13009 posted by ijed on 2013/06/09 02:33:22
I'm following this as well, thanks for the work.
Nothing solid to add though.
Ijed
#13010 posted by spy on 2013/06/09 07:06:40
is it possible to make rmq using some modern free engine?
i remember i've seen e1m1 on crytek eng
Shit Wrong Thread
#13011 posted by spy on 2013/06/09 07:07:37
And That Promised New Method
#13012 posted by Preach on 2013/06/10 00:54:55
http://tomeofpreach.wordpress.com/2013/06/09/quasi-randomised-algorithms-and-bsp/
So here's the way I was talking about, it gets you some improvement, even in the average case, over the deterministic compile run. I'm pretty sure that because the randomness is so low level, it's almost always a case of multiple tying brushes, and the randomisation changing how the tie is broken.
It's not mentioned in the post, but I did check and this version also performs well on the simple test map file. We achieve the same minimum of 160 (over 100 tests), and I'm beginning to suspect that can't be bettered. The graph shows an improvement in the average case, similar to the one that's in the article. So that's reassuring.
Not Ijed
#13013 posted by gb on 2013/06/13 09:50:48
is it possible to make rmq using some modern free engine?
that would end up being a free quake replacement, and zenimax would probably sue you for theft of IP.
Not Sure I Understand The Question
#13014 posted by ijed on 2013/06/13 15:28:52
It's on a free engine... if you mean porting it to something like Unity or sauerbrauten then yes it'd be possible, but in that case it'd be better to make a standalone brand new FPS game using the same ideals as Quake.
Making a classic FPS game isn't too taxing in terms of asset and feature creation, as long as you make a feasible plan and still to it.
An idealistic FPS is almost impossible to make :)
And a AAA FPS would be a great big waste of time.
It also depends how much of a hobby or job the project is in terms of both your own time and if you can pay others for theirs.
Prevent Monster From Running Off High Edge
#13015 posted by deqer on 2013/06/16 03:53:58
I have a thin and narrow platform (shaped as a square) that monster_ogres run around. It's over 256 units high from the ground, supported by 4 pillar/beams.
When monster_ogre sees the player, they run off the edge, dropping down to the floor below.
I was surprised to see this. I thought monsters don't do this.
I can't seem to find any information on this in google or quakewiki.
Figured It Out
#13016 posted by deqer on 2013/06/16 06:16:54
The problem is the UI bounding box for the entity (in TrenchBroom) is misleading/inaccurate. I made my platform as wide(or narrow) as the entity's box, so the entity falls off the edge.
To prove this, I surrounded my platform with walls, and the entity was stuck.
Same issue with the monster_dog box. I put a monster_dog in the corner, and it's stuck. I had to move it 8units away from both walls (of the corner) for it to work.
Pretty annoying.
#13017 posted by necros on 2013/06/16 07:09:01
the engine checks for collision in a >= way (as opposed to > ) so monsters have to be at least 1 unit away from walls to avoid getting stuck and have to be on platforms at least 2 units wider to avoid falling off.
note also that narrow pathways will be very difficult for monsters to move into because the checks for movement are done in discreet steps.
Thanks
#13018 posted by deqer on 2013/06/16 07:43:08
I added your information to http://quakewiki.org/wiki/Entity_guide
Feel free to adjust, or find better place for it in quakewiki.
Max Leafs Visible
#13019 posted by deqer on 2013/06/16 17:12:42
"max leafs visible: 416 near (-832 -2824 576)"
Although this doesn't appear to be a warning or error message, I still see it as one. I wasn't getting it before, and now I am; and I have no idea what it means.
I've googled it a number of ways, and getting no good results.
What does it mean, and how do I troubleshoot it?
Does it mean too many polys for a certain area of the map from point to point?
Nah It's Not An Error Message
#13020 posted by RickyT33 on 2013/06/16 18:15:16
It's just a report
It tells you that of all of the places in the map, the one with the most leaves visible to it (as in when the player is stood there) has 416 visible to it. You can go WAAAYYY higher than 416. The other three numbers are the coordinates of this position.
How Do I Use Quoth Content In My Quake Levels?
#13021 posted by hakkarin on 2013/06/16 19:12:21
So I heard about this awesome content pack called Quoth that adds a lot of stuff (monsters, weapons etc) into the game for modders to use in their levels. However, I have no idea how to make any of this stuff show up in NetRadiant (the level editor I use) or appear in-game. How do I load these custom resources into the editor and use them?
Quoth In Radiant
#13022 posted by deqer on 2013/06/16 19:34:09
Alright, Ricky. Added to quakewiki.
hakkarin,
This page: http://spawnhost.wordpress.com/tutorials/quake-1-radiant-tutorial/ talks about Radiant, and mentions Quoth
Avoid Jumping
#13023 posted by Cocerello on 2013/06/20 12:26:16
What is the maximum distance that can be jumped by strafe jumping and bunny-hopping? I need to know that distance for a map and i don't want to use fences or clip brushes and i want to make the chasm as smaller as possible.
Trying it by myself is no valid option as i can't get the hang of it.
As far as i know, with normal jumping the player can get across a chasm of about 180-200 units.
Bunny Hop
#13024 posted by Mandel on 2013/06/20 15:22:24
I don't know that there is a limit, other than a product of the maximal speed (2000?) and the air time of a regular jump, really.
if there are no slopes, grenades, rockets, or monsters, then you can protect against shortcuts by making the opposing edge slightly higher than standard jump height, so that it can't be jumped regardless of speed.
Quake Units
#13025 posted by madfox on 2013/06/21 02:29:34
Not sure how strafe jumping and bunnyhopping fits in,
but regular mapping subscribes:
Max distance player can jump foreward => 225
Max distance player can jump upwards => 42.5
Max distance player can fall not injured=> 275
Min gap in floor before fall through => 35
Max step player walks before jumping => 17
#13026 posted by gb on 2013/06/21 12:13:29
With a rocket-boosted bunny hop sequence or something like that, a player can reach *insane* speeds which translates to insane jumps. I don't think there is any protection against that sort of thing really, apart from something like a midair teleporter or trigger_push, which is a bit cheesy.
(With the grappling hook in RMQ, just as anecdotal evidence, it was possible to reach horizontal speeds upwards of 1000 units per second - I've seen speedrunners go above 600 by other methods.)
Skill should be rewarded. But for 99% of players, 300 units or so should be uncrossable if there is no boost possibility nearby (including slopes and any source of damage) and they have no explosives.
I think. ^^
The slime pool in e1m1 is rather uncrossable (for mere mortals that is) without extending the bridge, so take that as a rule.
#13027 posted by gb on 2013/06/21 12:16:23
The above goes for *Netquake* servers. Some popular engines are not quite Netquake.
Madfox
#13028 posted by negke on 2013/06/21 14:03:44
Those values are all wrong.
So Negke,
#13029 posted by mfx on 2013/06/21 15:32:48
what are actually the right values?
Correct Values
#13030 posted by negke on 2013/06/21 16:46:02
Max distance player can jump foreward = 244
Max distance player can jump upwards = 43
Max distance player can fall not injured = 256
Min gap in floor before fall through = 33
Max step player walks before jumping = 18
#13031 posted by negke on 2013/06/21 16:54:31
And yes, those are for Netquake, id1, vanilla, etc.
Also note that, I believe, there's a slight difference between old SW Quake and source ports concerning the out-of-water height (29).
#13032 posted by gb on 2013/06/21 16:59:10
yeah, the out-of-water height is a bit sensitive. Not everyone can get out of water when the ledge is 32 units high! Make it 16 to be safe.
Great
#13033 posted by mfx on 2013/06/21 18:10:11
thanks negke!
|