News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Mapping Help
This is the place to ask about mapping problems, techniques, and bug fixing, and pretty much anything else you want to do in the level editor.

For questions about coding, check out the Coding Help thread: https://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=60097
First | Previous | Next | Last
Haha Yeah 
Well I have an algorithm that will find quasi-optimal integer points for any given plane, but even then it doesn't work too well. I could try snapping to .125 or an even lower value and see how that goes. 
 
Yeah, that only says how precise the final representation can be. You may (and probably will) need extra precision for intermediate calculations. It's tricky stuff! 
 
The Doom3 editor supports 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 grids. 
Yes, Grids 
I can add that to TB in a jiffy, but the major problem right now is how to represent the planes with maximum precision across file saves. 
 
One option, and you probably don't want to do this, is to go the Worldcraft route. Store maps in your own format and export to MAP for compilation. That would retain perfect precision at all times and only need to snap once, eliminating drift. 
 
Of course, but it does show that even id ( and JC ) are fine with that kind of granularity.

And as others have stated already, certain fractional steps ( 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 ... ) should not cause rounding errors - as long as the absolute value "in front of the dot" is not too large.

This page is pretty handy to see whats going on : http://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/ 
0.125 Plane Point Rounding != Vertices On The Grid 
If you limit the plane point coordinate precision, you will be unable to snap vertices to the grid in certain situations. 
Willem 
It will eliminate drift, yes, but it leaves the problem of finding good representations of your brushes when exporting the map file. You must remember that TB will also support games like Hexen 2, where floating point compatible compilers are not available. I think it's better that the user actually sees what the geometry will look like to the compiler. 
 
But it would mean you don't have to use integers, but could use certain fractions of floats for your drift-free plane definitions - which could mean more accuracy to what the user intends - or am i seeing this wrong ? 
 
Sorry if I sound like an idiot for asking, but if a brush is just a collection of planes at a certain vector how can they even become degenerate? Convexity? 
The Brushes Won't Degenerate 
But if you limit the precision of the plane points, you limit the number of points where a vertex can be because not every plane can be represented with limited-precision plane points. As the easiest case, think of a plane that is parallel to the XY plane with a Z value of 0.4. This plane cannot be represented with integer precision plane points. The closest approximation is the XY plane itself.

The problem is that it is impossible to represent the many brushes which can be created with TB's vertex editing (or arbitrary rotation, for that matter) if you limit the precision of plane points. Of course, the smaller the value you snap the points to, the smaller the errors will become.

In any case, I feel the best way is to leave this to the user. I will add a setting to the map properties dialog that will allow the user to choose between integer coordinates and floating point coordinates, and to increase the maximum number of digits written to the map file to a really high value so that the rounding will be minimal. 
Well All I Can Say Is 'I Wish Worldcraft Could Go Down To 0.125 
That would help me a lot, without me having to learn a new editor. 
Well, Mine Go Up To 11 
 
Logic Gates In Quake 
I made a little tutorial about how to make logic gates in Quake. Currently I just wrote a text file and made an example map, but I plan to put a page on the wiki when I have some better pictures to use :)

http://www.quaketastic.com/upload/files/misc/tutorial_logic.zip

It shows how to make AND, OR and IF ELSE. Using these as building blocks you can do all kinds of things (if else is actually two gates inverse of each other anyway).

What I didn't explain is that the single door logic gate is essentially a NOT gate. 
Very Cool! 
I'm sure there'll be many cool puzzles coming out of this. 
No Textures 
Hi guys, I just wanted to give this editor a try and read the docu but I don't have any textures loaded.
I am using DarkPlaces and chose the DarkPlace folder for my directory with the Quake stuff in it.
But I don't see any textures being loaded, what am I doing wrong <.< 
 
which editor?? trenchbroom?

edit > map properties > + button > find your .wad file 
You... 
need to download the .wad files.

https://www.quaddicted.com/files/wads/id.wad.zip <--- the standard textures

There's a lot of different texture .wads in that directory too, they *should* all be quake 1 .wads 
Thank 
you very much!

I used to make maps for Doom and thought that wads are in the main directory like DOOM2.wad (also because of the Quake.wad mentioned in the documentation ^^).

And I know this is a different topic, but can I also make maps for the Q1 expansions like SoA or DoE somehow? I'd love to make use of the entities featured in those games. 
SoA And DoE 
You will need to hunt down the .fgd files (the entity data that Worldcraft and Trenchbroom use) for them. I don't have them, sorry. They used to be over at PlanetQuake but that site is dead now. 
This Should Be The Right File 
That's... 
the one. 
Thanks For The Link But... 
I get an error in the console line "Parse error at line 8, column 1: Unkown Entity definition class @ Main". Are other fgds not supported by TB yet? 
It'sMe 
Open the FGD in a text editor and delete lines 8 up to and including 13. 
I Believe That... 
Trenchbroom has extra data in it's fgd file that isn't in the originals. You would have to add things like the colors and model info into it for it to work 100% in Trenchbroom.

And that looks like a problem with that .fgd. Try commenting out the @main lines down to the worldspawn entry by putting a \\ in front of each line. I'm not sure which editor uses that command but it's not a standard Worldcraft item. 
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.