Haha Yeah
#12678 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/03/27 21:05:11
Well I have an algorithm that will find quasi-optimal integer points for any given plane, but even then it doesn't work too well. I could try snapping to .125 or an even lower value and see how that goes.
#12679 posted by Tyrann on 2013/03/27 21:10:34
Yeah, that only says how precise the final representation can be. You may (and probably will) need extra precision for intermediate calculations. It's tricky stuff!
#12680 posted by rebb on 2013/03/27 21:13:07
The Doom3 editor supports 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 grids.
Yes, Grids
#12681 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/03/27 21:24:36
I can add that to TB in a jiffy, but the major problem right now is how to represent the planes with maximum precision across file saves.
#12682 posted by JneeraZ on 2013/03/27 21:34:55
One option, and you probably don't want to do this, is to go the Worldcraft route. Store maps in your own format and export to MAP for compilation. That would retain perfect precision at all times and only need to snap once, eliminating drift.
#12683 posted by rebb on 2013/03/27 21:41:19
Of course, but it does show that even id ( and JC ) are fine with that kind of granularity.
And as others have stated already, certain fractional steps ( 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 ... ) should not cause rounding errors - as long as the absolute value "in front of the dot" is not too large.
This page is pretty handy to see whats going on : http://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/
0.125 Plane Point Rounding != Vertices On The Grid
#12684 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/03/27 21:44:22
If you limit the plane point coordinate precision, you will be unable to snap vertices to the grid in certain situations.
Willem
#12685 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/03/27 21:45:37
It will eliminate drift, yes, but it leaves the problem of finding good representations of your brushes when exporting the map file. You must remember that TB will also support games like Hexen 2, where floating point compatible compilers are not available. I think it's better that the user actually sees what the geometry will look like to the compiler.
#12686 posted by rebb on 2013/03/27 21:50:18
But it would mean you don't have to use integers, but could use certain fractions of floats for your drift-free plane definitions - which could mean more accuracy to what the user intends - or am i seeing this wrong ?
#12687 posted by Spiney on 2013/03/27 21:57:08
Sorry if I sound like an idiot for asking, but if a brush is just a collection of planes at a certain vector how can they even become degenerate? Convexity?
The Brushes Won't Degenerate
#12688 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/03/27 22:05:54
But if you limit the precision of the plane points, you limit the number of points where a vertex can be because not every plane can be represented with limited-precision plane points. As the easiest case, think of a plane that is parallel to the XY plane with a Z value of 0.4. This plane cannot be represented with integer precision plane points. The closest approximation is the XY plane itself.
The problem is that it is impossible to represent the many brushes which can be created with TB's vertex editing (or arbitrary rotation, for that matter) if you limit the precision of plane points. Of course, the smaller the value you snap the points to, the smaller the errors will become.
In any case, I feel the best way is to leave this to the user. I will add a setting to the map properties dialog that will allow the user to choose between integer coordinates and floating point coordinates, and to increase the maximum number of digits written to the map file to a really high value so that the rounding will be minimal.
Well All I Can Say Is 'I Wish Worldcraft Could Go Down To 0.125
#12689 posted by RickyT33 on 2013/03/27 22:24:43
That would help me a lot, without me having to learn a new editor.
Well, Mine Go Up To 11
#12690 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/03/27 22:32:50
Logic Gates In Quake
#12691 posted by than on 2013/03/29 05:51:06
I made a little tutorial about how to make logic gates in Quake. Currently I just wrote a text file and made an example map, but I plan to put a page on the wiki when I have some better pictures to use :)
http://www.quaketastic.com/upload/files/misc/tutorial_logic.zip
It shows how to make AND, OR and IF ELSE. Using these as building blocks you can do all kinds of things (if else is actually two gates inverse of each other anyway).
What I didn't explain is that the single door logic gate is essentially a NOT gate.
Very Cool!
#12692 posted by Spiney on 2013/03/29 21:49:55
I'm sure there'll be many cool puzzles coming out of this.
No Textures
#12693 posted by It'sMe! on 2013/04/01 00:52:50
Hi guys, I just wanted to give this editor a try and read the docu but I don't have any textures loaded.
I am using DarkPlaces and chose the DarkPlace folder for my directory with the Quake stuff in it.
But I don't see any textures being loaded, what am I doing wrong <.<
#12694 posted by necros on 2013/04/01 02:30:53
which editor?? trenchbroom?
edit > map properties > + button > find your .wad file
You...
need to download the .wad files.
https://www.quaddicted.com/files/wads/id.wad.zip <--- the standard textures
There's a lot of different texture .wads in that directory too, they *should* all be quake 1 .wads
Thank
#12696 posted by It'sMe! on 2013/04/01 02:43:07
you very much!
I used to make maps for Doom and thought that wads are in the main directory like DOOM2.wad (also because of the Quake.wad mentioned in the documentation ^^).
And I know this is a different topic, but can I also make maps for the Q1 expansions like SoA or DoE somehow? I'd love to make use of the entities featured in those games.
SoA And DoE
#12697 posted by quaketree on 2013/04/01 04:17:01
You will need to hunt down the .fgd files (the entity data that Worldcraft and Trenchbroom use) for them. I don't have them, sorry. They used to be over at PlanetQuake but that site is dead now.
This Should Be The Right File
That's...
#12699 posted by quaketree on 2013/04/01 17:48:58
the one.
Thanks For The Link But...
#12700 posted by It'sMe on 2013/04/01 18:30:46
I get an error in the console line "Parse error at line 8, column 1: Unkown Entity definition class @ Main". Are other fgds not supported by TB yet?
It'sMe
#12701 posted by SleepwalkR on 2013/04/01 21:31:37
Open the FGD in a text editor and delete lines 8 up to and including 13.
I Believe That...
#12702 posted by quaketree on 2013/04/01 21:35:04
Trenchbroom has extra data in it's fgd file that isn't in the originals. You would have to add things like the colors and model info into it for it to work 100% in Trenchbroom.
And that looks like a problem with that .fgd. Try commenting out the @main lines down to the worldspawn entry by putting a \\ in front of each line. I'm not sure which editor uses that command but it's not a standard Worldcraft item.
|