Uh...
#1017 posted by metlslime on 2006/12/14 11:35:03
by the way, news submission page works now, as does "creating a new discussion thread" page.
news rejection feature for moderators is still broken, though
Yup
#1018 posted by DaZ on 2006/12/14 13:55:38
the site is 10x faster now, well done hudslime!
#1019 posted by Trinca on 2006/12/15 01:21:07
i notest also that site is real much faster! good work!
Apostrophe Test
#1020 posted by Spirit on 2006/12/15 12:40:09
' '' '''
''
Dunno If You Want It...
#1021 posted by Megazoid on 2006/12/19 06:52:36
Thanks...
#1022 posted by metlslime on 2006/12/19 12:49:53
I'll see If I have time to throw that up later.
Ha!
#1023 posted by HeadThump on 2006/12/19 14:16:41
Pretty clever how that replaces the crate. So long as the goodies in it are as good as the crate full of firearms and health packs.
No Search Feature?
#1024 posted by Pulseczar on 2006/12/22 02:44:15
:((((
Search
#1025 posted by Preach on 2006/12/22 03:43:34
#1026 posted by Pulseczar on 2006/12/24 07:08:31
yea, that's how I ended up doing it.. if the site operator isn't going to have a search feature, he/she could at least include a shortcut to that (a little Google entry box to search the forum).. good for keeping people from asking the same questions over and over - given the assumption that they'd actually try to search the forum first for previously-answered questions.
just a thought. :)
Google Search Box
#1027 posted by DaZ on 2006/12/28 10:59:26
not a bad idea Metl, might fit nicely next to the logout link in the menu bar...
-)
#1028 posted by PuLSaR on 2006/12/30 12:46:43
metlslime you should also add "happy new year/christmas/any other holiday" newsletter for each registered user
=)
Metl
#1029 posted by . on 2007/01/01 06:53:38
I just thought, why not have a QC forum? Yeah there's Mapping Help but that's rather different. I don't think it's a bad idea to keep them seperate and easier to reference particular posts.
You Mean Like A Qc Thread?
#1030 posted by metlslime on 2007/01/01 16:50:09
we have a couple of those i think. Maybe there isn't a catch-all qc thread, though. I guess someone could start one.
Hm..
#1031 posted by necros on 2007/01/01 23:53:50
i tend to just ask any qc related questions in the mapping help thread.
Append:
#1032 posted by necros on 2007/01/01 23:54:36
could maybe modify that thread to be more general, but i've grown attached to "mapping help" over the years... :P
#1033 posted by Trinca on 2007/01/02 01:39:24
i think a QC thread could be good.
Nah
#1034 posted by Spirit on 2007/01/02 02:23:02
Look at the other "big" game-related threads that are not stickied: Other Games, Speedmapping.
Both would be interesting to be sticky but it works fine as it is.
QC really is a minor issue hereand could either b discussed in Mapping Help (as now) or anyone could create a new thread for it (with a nice and proper header description) that would be amongst the other threads. This primarily is a mapping/gameart board, the QC home is inside3d.
Right
#1035 posted by necros on 2007/01/02 18:21:15
i usually just post qc questions on inside3d
Metlslime
#1036 posted by JPL on 2007/01/08 03:47:12
I just got that clicking on FAQ link
ERROR: SQL error 1054 on line 31 of faq.php.
Don't know if it has been already mentioned.
Ah...
#1037 posted by metlslime on 2007/01/08 13:58:06
good catch. I made a database change and must have forgotten to update all the pages to match. Probably fix it tonight when I get home.
Fixed.
#1038 posted by metlslime on 2007/01/08 23:42:25
Metlslime
#1039 posted by JPL on 2007/01/09 00:02:18
Cool !
Note To Moderators:
#1040 posted by metlslime on 2007/01/17 02:14:42
rejecting a news submission now works again.
Also, there is a new feature called "reject as spam" which, instead of posting the submission in the general abuse thread, will reject it and hide it completely so that no user will see it. This is good for anything that is true spam from a bot or abusive visitor, and also for duplicate posts -- you can approve one of the submissions, and reject the duplicate as spam so nobody sees it.
Reject And Hide?
#1041 posted by . on 2007/01/17 16:14:25
Why not reject and delete?
|