You may have failed to embarass Microsoft and Google by not delivering whatever it was you wanted to do (never cared tbh), but there are a few bugs right here, waiting to be squished by you...

No, I totally have not failed to deliver this thing you don't care about.

I, Baker, am now the creator of a programming language and development environment that runs on everything and by my accounts better than everything. I had to level up about 200 times to do it, and if it is super hard -- I like it!

I have some interesting choices I need to make, and I think this beer is going to help me figure it out.

I will say that I am a bit touched that despite a couple of years of "developer inactivity" that this thread is still getting love and attention touches me. It makes me think I am right to care a lot about Quake --- which I do. 

But a lot has happened with Quake ports in the last few years. Any plans of bringing Mark V up to speed? TBH I am only using QSS these days because Mark V cannot run all maps any more. 

@Joel B
>Have you tried different settings for Autoscale in the preferences menu?

That option is for the OpenGL (MarkV, not MarkV Winquake version) only :(
That's the only "issue" with the amazing winquake software rendering version, which runs so smooth and without Z-Buffering issues etc. 

Do you have a Discord account, a Twitter, an e-mail address or something where we could stay in touch? 

if that's already all we read from Baker for the next 1-2 years again. Sadly. 

Is the WinQuake version of Mark V a true software rendered version or is it some shader type of thing? 

It's purely software rendered, no GPU required.

Its support for big maps is quite impressive, and I was hoping to ask him a few questions about that, but nevermind. 

thanks - this is helpful