#866 posted by necros on 2006/03/30 16:18:55
maybe it's ^^^ his fault the forums have been slow then! hehehehee...
Hmm...
#867 posted by bal on 2006/03/31 00:22:11
Yeah, ever since you've added this paging thing, the forums have become really fast for me...
Yep...
#868 posted by JPL on 2006/03/31 00:51:02
Exactly the same here... Maybe you corrected a small bug indirectly... Anyway: it's cool how it works fine now !
So...
#869 posted by Kell on 2006/03/31 04:36:00
tell me agian why using generic php-bb-nuke-thingy-code that every other web forum uses is a bad idea and coding Func from scratch makes the forum so much better? It's not that I actually believe a word of it, it's just that it's a rainy afternoon and I could do with a laugh.
Hehe
#870 posted by bal on 2006/03/31 04:51:46
Seems that now that the forum is faster, the spammers are having less trouble doing their thing... =D
Jesus...
#871 posted by necros on 2006/03/31 08:38:11
could we just lock down posting to registered users for now anyway? this is getting out of hand :(
Actually
#872 posted by R.P.G. on 2006/03/31 09:27:24
Considering the amount of spam most people get in their inbox, this is pretty tame.
I'd Like
#873 posted by bambuz on 2006/03/31 18:03:00
to have at least 50 posts per page. :) They are usually very short on this board.
Thanks metl for fixing func, it now works pretty well!
Test
#874 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/04 04:02:41
testes...
Another Test...
#875 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/04 04:03:15
maybe i should have a test thread for this shit...
One More...
#876 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/04 04:04:10
bleh
Urgh
#877 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/04 04:05:11
why my code suck?
Yay
#878 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/04 04:23:45
okay, some thread paging changes:
* the URL behavior is now compatible with the old way. meaning, there's no automatic cap on the number of posts. start= and end= are required to limit the range of posts displayed.
* the title of the thread on the forum page will now link to the "last 25" posts.
* logged-in users now have an "all" link that really does give you all posts, just like the old days.
* logged-out users just see the thread title (links to the last 25 posts) and a post count (not a link.) This might not be final.
* if you post to a thread and you're not paged back, you will see the same post range plus your new post, like the old days. If you were paged back, you will just see your new post.
* eliminated the "viewing all X posts." message. If there's no page navigation UI, that means you're viewing all posts.
Sounds Good!
#879 posted by aguirRe on 2006/04/04 05:47:18
.
New Stuff:
#880 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/05 02:51:07
* added "first" and "last" links, and got rid of the numbers (it was too cluttered with them.)
* added "number of posts per page" as a user preference (check your account page!)
I Vote For
#881 posted by Jago on 2006/04/11 03:19:29
Locking down posting priveledges to registered users only.
Nono
#882 posted by bambuz on 2006/04/11 14:09:53
then many (at least not me) wouldn't have ever joined this board... hmm.....
You Left The Door Wide Open There
#883 posted by HeadThump on 2006/04/11 21:52:09
. . .
Hey !
#884 posted by JPL on 2006/04/11 23:00:18
You could let any people read the post, but let them unable to post if not logged. Many forum act like this (i.e planetquake, QuakeOne, etc...) so why not here ?
Well
#885 posted by necros on 2006/04/11 23:22:56
i do sort of agree with the original intention of the way things are set up atm, in that any one can drop in and leave a post without any hassle of signing up. it's just too bad that also makes the board a target for spam bots and such. :\
Hmm
#886 posted by bal on 2006/04/12 01:00:48
Add a captcha for guests posting...
I always say, if someone can't take the time to sign up, it's probably that what they want to say isn't so interesting. =D
And for those who like posting from somewhere where they can't log in, a captcha shouldn't be too big of a hassle.
Well...
#887 posted by metlslime on 2006/04/12 01:16:11
Maybe i should have mentioned it in this thread instead of the spam thread, but:
I made a slight change to the javascript code to discourage spam bots -- the "post a reply" form now does not have a valid "action" (the action is the URL of the target page to submit data to) until the javascript sets it right before submitting. So, assuming spambots don't execute the javascript the way a real browser would, this might stop them.
Oh Right...
#888 posted by bal on 2006/04/12 02:45:47
I read it, than instantenously forgot about it. =)
Been any spam since then? Don't think there's been any these last few days...
Yay for metl! \o/
Oh Yeah!
#889 posted by necros on 2006/04/12 09:55:18
i had forgotten about that, but now you mention it, i haven't seen any spam so far, woot ^_^ (crosses fingers not to jinx it :P)
RECURSIVE ERROR: There Was A OMG THEY'RE BACK!
#890 posted by mwh on 2006/04/21 09:18:20
Seen a couple of these today :( I'd hoped the problem was fixed...
|