Pssst ... That's The One He Means ... The Ichthyosaur
#64 posted by Kell on 2008/08/25 05:46:18
Psst...I know that...that's why I pointed out the suggestion had already been made much earlier in the thread
I'm Not Sure We Need New Monsters Right Now...
#65 posted by mwh on 2008/08/25 09:13:56
... as I don't think people have really figured out the Quoth menagerie yet. Or at least I haven't. I had a strange sense of relief in Ruined Nation when I saw a shambler. "Ah!", I thought, "I know what to do here!", as I ran right up to him and did the double-barrel shotgun shambler dance. I don't have the same reflexes for, say, defenders, yet (my best approach so far is to run around like a headless chicken and take the odd potshot until they're gone).
I Want
#66 posted by megaman on 2008/08/25 09:33:57
enemies that
hide and try to get in your back.
fly sideways while shooting at you in bursts.
have to kind of projectiles, like fast + slow.
homing missiles that have a max turning radius and are pretty fast so you can evade them by going sideways and then forward.
Interesting Discussion Indeed
#67 posted by negke on 2008/08/25 09:42:54
Check out this water boss http://www.quaddicted.com/anaconda.html (not the one on the screenshot).
Choppity Chop Chop
#68 posted by Shambler on 2008/08/25 10:53:32
Sorry to be a tad blunt, but you can blame necros for the earlier versions :P
That's not blunt - I'll happily blame necros :D
the Drole or whatever it's called
What is it with learning the names? It's written on the webpage. It's printed on the screen if one kills you. It's only five letters, and one syllable. Anyone would think you're trying to not learn them.
Ummm. Well I don't tend to read the webpage much....and I don't tend to get killed by Droles much... And I have a small brain that can only fit certain information in.
That Anaconda
#69 posted by Text_Fish on 2008/08/25 12:22:21
shit me right up.
Wouldn't work very well on a modern alpha-vis'ed map though.
Re: The Big Fish...
#70 posted by Omus on 2008/08/25 13:14:22
I prefer the fast-bitey concept than the slow projectile thrower. Given that this monster is meant to dominate a large area of water, you can't allow the player to easily plug it from a distance while only having to dodge a few projectiles. It could make for a lot of quite easy fights, and make the player lose respect for the monster. Something is required with the immediacy of a fiend that takes the fight to the player.
It doesn't have to be much faster than the player or it could even be a bit slower, just as long as it gets to you quicker than those lazy rotfish.
I was planning a rotten, zombiesque version of a deep sea angler fish.
Heh, that's exactly what I imagined, I just couldn't remember what those things were called.
Also the vermis could make a good kraken-like underwater boss, maybe if it was adapted to grab and hold players instead of throwing them.
Text_Fish
#71 posted by Spirit on 2008/08/25 15:14:25
You can vis liquids non-transparent. Transparent lava looks so silly...
Yes
#72 posted by bear on 2008/08/25 15:54:38
You can almost look at Quake as being like a 3D shmup like Contra, where it's all about finding the non-lethal places to be standing at any given instant. When you look at it that way, there's a whole range of attacks waiting to be tried.
That was pretty much my idea, I really think a lot of bullet patterns from 2d-shooters/Shoot 'em ups could work well in quake.
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~cs8k-cyu/bulletml/bulletml_applet_e.html
#73 posted by Lunaran on 2008/08/25 16:08:48
I'm Not Sure We Need New Monsters Right Now
as I don't think people have really figured out the Quoth menagerie yet.
Yeah, you're right. Close the thread, we really shouldn't even be talking about this.
#74 posted by Kell on 2008/08/26 00:48:19
I want
enemies that
hide and try to get in your back.
polyp
fly sideways while shooting at you in bursts.
polyp
have two kind of projectiles, like fast + slow.
got me there
homing missiles that have a max turning radius and are pretty fast so you can evade them by going sideways and then forward.
death lord
rocketeer
Heee
#75 posted by necros on 2008/08/26 02:10:24
i was going to say that ^^^^ ;)
i've noticed people not side stepping rocketeer rockets in demos for the maps i released. those rockets are very easily avoided, even in a completely barren room.
same thing with gaunts-- their lightning is easily avoided by just strafing.
out of curiosity, are those two things not readily apparent, and how can we communicate it better to the player?
I Think
#76 posted by Text_Fish on 2008/08/26 02:14:36
that's the sort of thing players just have to discover on their own. Isn't that part of the fun of meeting new baddies?
Weehl
#77 posted by ijed on 2008/08/26 03:16:25
I read the readme and use those techniques by habit now, but it's unrealistic to expect all players to be mappers.
Will say that consistently sidestepping the Gaunts lightning is made almost impossible because of its duration - you need a big open space to do it.
#78 posted by mwh on 2008/08/26 03:31:02
Lun:
Well, that's a bit more negative that I meant it. But maybe we could talk about how to use quoth monsters effectively *as well*?
necros:
I've noticed that dodging rockeeter rockets isn't that hard. Hadn't noticed so much that dodging gaunt lightning was easy, I guess shamblers train you to not to try to dodge that sort of thing. Also, they don't seem to do that much damage, so I think I don't find taking the punishment while I'm killing them that bad.
Yeah
#79 posted by necros on 2008/08/26 03:37:51
maybe it was a mistake to do the gaunt attack with lightning. i had a feeling about the shambler vs gaunt lightning attacks.
if you stand still, the gaunt's lightning actually does more damage than the shambler's (45 vs 30) but the damage is calculated dynamically based on how far it hit you from the player's origin, so if the lightning grazes you on the foot, it'll do about 1-5 damage. as long as you are dodging in at least some limited fashion the damage is reduced drastically.
i guess the problem is that this isn't communicated to the player. the tools to avoid/mitigate damage are there, but a typical player isn't aware of them. :(
Append:
#80 posted by necros on 2008/08/26 03:38:29
i had a feeling about the shambler vs gaunt lightning attacks.
that is to say, i had a feeling it would be brought up in this discussion.
Teaching
#81 posted by Lunaran on 2008/08/26 04:49:34
You need to teach these things to the player in a nice literal fashion. We've all been playing with Ogres and such for so long we've got them all figured out, but the new things take time, and Quoth by nature left that largely up to whoever built maps using those monsters first, the kelltestNs notwithstanding. I know the quoth monsters I've faced so far have all been in groups or mixed up with other monsters so there's no real chance to figure out the behavior for serious.
Also,
#82 posted by HeadThump on 2008/08/26 05:03:50
we all learned how to fight the Quake monsters on small maps of 40 to 60 odd monsters each where you faced small groups of monsters. Most Quoth maps have been oriented towards horde combat making the adjustment a bit more difficult. Quake maps today are mere training grounds in comparison though there have been some really well balanced maps, Kell's first Quoth map (one with Red in the title, I think), for instance.
Monsters' Lightning Attacks.
#83 posted by PM on 2008/08/26 05:14:57
The shamblers, along with other lightning zappers in other mods, train me to hide from anything blasting lightning at the player. Only when I read the Quoth docs later that I learned nightgaunt lightning was avoidable.
For what it is worth, the nightgaunt lightning gave me the idea to do something similar to the blue dragon in SoE: Indian Summer. The dragon begins aiming behind a moving player, then the lightning in the following frames catch up to the player to zap him and cause some damage, though the moving player only takes 10 or 20 damage instead of the full 40. This was a way to balance the dragons' attacks between players and other monsters. In the older Dragons mods, even though the red and green dragons could cause far more damage than the blue dragon, it was *always* the lightning from the blue dragon that damages and kills my player, and this would not do if I ever wanted to place a Draco bot in any map I would build.
<- No Beer
#84 posted by megaman on 2008/08/26 08:49:48
you can't allow the player to easily plug it from a distance while only having to dodge a few projectiles.
Fast Homing projectiles.
Kell:
No, no, no. Maybe i wasn't precise enough:
hide and try to get in your back.
-> hide != invisible, very fast, teleportation.
hide as in: hides behind pillars or in corners so you walk by, or in a larger room circles around you and comes from the back. Retreats if it doesn't cause dmg from the place it is in.
fly sideways while shooting at you in bursts.
-> i meant bursts like a shotgun, but not insta-hit (still a fast proj), so dodging is interesting. not (perceived?) insta hit steam whatever projectiles that just hit you no matter what :)
I think circleing around the player is ai behaviour that's not used enough. All melee enemies seem to just run up to you ;/
Yuck
#85 posted by Spirit on 2008/08/26 09:53:27
Does/did anyone actually like (as in prefer to the original behaviour) the crosshair evading (strafing) monsters in Nehahra?
I Hated Them
#86 posted by necros on 2008/08/26 10:12:07
i spent a lot of time with godmode on playing nehahra.
bot behaviour is one type of thing and SP gameplay is another.
for one thing, bots behave way to erratically to accurately predict difficulty and ammo usage.
there are other points, but they all revolve around the 'randomness' of bot behaviour. there are reasons that a SP game has rules and bots break all those rules.
Actually, The One Monster Change I'd Really Like To See Is....
#87 posted by Shambler on 2008/08/26 10:24:28
REMOVING z-aware Ogres :)
You Meant To Say
#88 posted by anonymous user on 2008/08/26 11:01:59
cheat-aware Ogres
|