I Bought A Sandisk Sansa Clip+
#665 posted by megaman on 2011/01/02 14:13:25
Anybody care for thoughts on that?
#666 posted by Spirit on 2011/01/02 14:45:18
Excellent! I have one too, 11 months or so.
I highly recommend Rockbox on it. You get per file bookmarks, better track "navigation" (ff/back) and many other goodies.
http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/RockboxUtility
If you are listening with normal ear plugs and are not a "audiophile" I also recommend transcoding to something like Vorbis Q3. I can't hear a difference if I am on the run and it saves quite some space.
Already Installed Rockbox
#667 posted by megaman on 2011/01/02 19:02:06
but the navigation is clearly worse than the original firmware... most of the stuff, e.g. switching artists, is more complicated, I'm not really satisfied with that. I wish there was a way to restructure the menus. Other than that, Rockbox is nice. Especially that you can run doom on it :D
Hardware wise, the clip+ is nice, the only thing that bugs me is that the buttons for the volume control are hard to press (esp. because the phone jack is on the opposite side of the case so you can't easily hold the device)
Oh
#668 posted by megaman on 2011/01/02 19:02:54
and is there a "lock" function with rockbox? on the old firmware, it's just hold the home button...
#669 posted by Spirit on 2011/01/02 20:51:22
Manual says "home+select". The manual is handy!
I usually navigate by files. But sometimes I use the database thing too. If you do not return to the homescreen it stays in the last used "directory" so you can simply go back a step or two for choosing another artist. I dont really understand what your problem is.
Previously the jack was on the same side like the volume buttons, THAT was bad. I have not any problems with the setup now. I put my thumb below the jack and use the index finger to click.
You can boot the original firmware by holding the home button btw.
Just Bought A Sandy Bridge CPU
#670 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/02/15 11:47:56
And an exploding MSI motherboard and some new RAM. I know that there is a 20% chance that the SATA2 ports will fail after 3 years, but I got a good deal on a mobo with 4xSATA3. I couldn't resist the idea of getting 5Ghz on a quad core which goes like poo off a stick. Core i5 2500k is what I ordered, with for �162 is just a phenominal amount of power. Anyone else thinking of getting Sandy Bridge?
I Just Bought A BLT
#671 posted by ijed on 2011/02/15 12:41:04
The hold function is easy to use and I didn't even need the manual - usage is very intuitive.
I'm looking forward to the next series, but for the morning at least, this one almost exceeds requirements - highly recommended.
A Bacon Lettuce Tomato?
#672 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/02/15 13:32:45
Yeah - I heard about those. Meant to be pretty good. Im not sure if I can afford food now though. I just spent all of my money on hardware.
A 1981 Album By Jack Bruce (formerly Of Cream)?
#673 posted by megaman on 2011/02/15 15:42:56
Hehe Awesome
#674 posted by megaman on 2011/02/15 15:44:33
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLT_(disambiguation)
All of these are bizarre with "I bought a..." in front of them.
#675 posted by necros on 2011/02/15 20:07:24
5ghz quad core = vis madness?
Thoughts Please :)
#676 posted by DaZ on 2011/02/23 23:42:22
My friends pc when playing games will seemingly randomly crash back to the desktop with no error messages whatsoever. All games are affected and he is getting his rage on! :) His specs:
amd x2 3ghz black edition (but not overclocked)
4gb ddr2 memory (I think its Crucial branded)
nvidia 260gtx
windows 7 64 bit.
I should mention that this has been happening for quite a while but he only just reached the point of insanity =) I've looked at the pc several times but just can't seem to work out whats causing it, if I was a betting man I would say the memory could be faulty but I don't want to tell him to buy new Ram if it could be something else.
The pc is perfectly stable with standard windows tasks, its just games that are affected. Any ideas?
Memtest86
#677 posted by jt_ on 2011/02/24 00:00:45
#678 posted by necros on 2011/02/24 00:09:43
also, sometimes the best way to find problems is to just plain swap out parts. :(
USE REALTEMP AND CPUZ AND PRIME95
#679 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/02/24 02:37:05
SIMULTANEOUSLY (oops capslock) and see if the CPU overheats under load.
What's Been Said
#680 posted by Jago on 2011/02/24 10:09:31
check temperatures of both GPU and CPU
update drivers
burn a memtest CD, boot from it and run the tests for 12+ hours
If none of the above gives any definite answers, start replacing components 1 by 1.
Thanks
#681 posted by DaZ on 2011/02/24 15:05:15
Cheers all, I'll certainly try all the suggestions.
Les Bridges Silents
#682 posted by bamby on 2011/02/25 22:03:11
so Ricky, are you happy with sandy one of yours? I was thinking of a version with integrated graphics so the box wouldn't need much ventilation. But the DRM stuff keeps me wary. And it needs to run in Ubuntu.
Well Im Loving It.
#683 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/02/25 23:51:32
95W TDP = good, 4.8Ghz @ 1.38v = good.
Crysis is running on Enthusiast DX10 8xAA 1080p @ 50fps (!)
But im no linux user (or atleast not out of choice) and I got the P67 board so there's no on-chip GFX there. But remember the most you will get as an overclock on a H67 board is the FSB which apparently can give up to a 5% boost, but it overclocks your PCIe frequency. Which is bad.
If you plan on running 3D GFX (games etc) then get P67. Im a Windows user.
Apparently the onboard GFX (the 3000 series I think) is about as fast as a Radeon 5450.
Bamby
#684 posted by mwh on 2011/02/28 10:36:21
Natty (out in April) should run fine on sandybridge. Maverick sorta works, no 3D support.
#685 posted by [Kona] on 2011/03/25 04:40:58
So what do you guys think of SSD vs non-SSD, and 32bit vs 64bit Windows?
Thinking about getting a 120gb SSD for the extra performance, but they're not cheap. And it means storing most crap on a different hdd.
As for the 64bit, I know I'll only be able to run 4gb memory max, but the fact most software is designed to run on 32bit is a bit scary. Any software that's more than 5 years old won't run on 64bit, so I'm bound to have some programs that won't work. Shit even Flash and Java doesn't have an official release for 64. I'd rather just sacrifice some memory and get proper compatibility.
#686 posted by jt_ on 2011/03/25 04:54:57
There shouldn't be any problems with 32 bit apps on a 64 bit system. 64 bit cpu's include the entire ia32 instruction set (don't quote me on that), so there shouldn't be any problem. I don't know who told you any software that's more than 5 years old won't run on 64 cpu's but they're retarded. The software will run (mostly), there may be an incompatibles because the software hasn't been updated, but for the most part it will run. I'm pretty sure flash and java both have versions that are 'official' for 64 bit, as i have them installed. There's no reason to not go 64 bit.
Kona
#687 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/03/25 05:13:15
The solution is this:
Dual boot!
I haven't really had any problems running Windows7 64, even though I have another HDD with XP on it. I haven't booted to XP for ages.
The SSD thing - Dont get one of those Kingston ones. They are cheap but I read a couple of reviews and whilst they are fast in some areas, they don't seem to be anywhere near as say OCZ or Crucial. The OCZ Vertex 3 is really fast! Like FUCK ME!!!
But anyway, I have an 80GB Intel SSD at work, and the computer is really quick to boot and load apps. And yes - I have a Samsung Spinpoint F3 SATAII 1TB drive (excellent drive, cheap, massive and fast) as a storage disc with two partitions. I want to put an SSD in my home workstation, but I'm gonna wait a little longer to see if they suddenly get bigger and cheaper. I'd be looking at �170 for something worth having - a fast 120Gb drive. It's damn tempting......
Kona
#688 posted by nitin on 2011/03/25 05:13:50
apart from a few older 32 bit designed games (or rather 32 bit desgined installers and/or copy protectin programs), my windows 7 64 bit install hasnt had too many issues.
Plus it is far less susceptible to rootkits etc.
Look At It This Way:
#689 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/03/25 05:22:02
If you buy an SSD and a 64bit OS then you can still keep your old HDD with your old OS on it. Unless you replace the motherboard then the old OS is gonna work if you boot to it, so you're not loosing any capability really.
Depending where you are, there is a bloody good deal on Windows 7 Ultimate on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/B001XCWGII/ref=sr_1_1_olp?ie=UTF8&qid=1301026706&sr=8-1&condition=new
If you get the retail copy (Full Version) then you get a 32 bit disc and a 64 bit disc in the box. And you can carry the OS over to any new systems you might purchase in the future with the same license (unlike OEM versions, where you only get 1 disc, and you are only allowed to use on one motherboard).
If you are in the UK, the above deal is a no-brainer. Its significantly cheaper than the Retail Version of Windows 7 Home Premium! God know's why. Maybe it's because the service pack came out, and now they are trying to get rid of old stock. And no-one bought Ultimate cause it was really expensive.
|