Eh
#602 posted by ijed on 2010/01/03 02:30:41
Just buy a headset? They're cheap and work.
Just make sure to buy it online.
Ijed Is Right U Know :P
#603 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/01/03 05:28:26
U know it to be true :PPP
Eh? Woah!
#604 posted by Shambler on 2010/01/03 11:13:50
Didn't want to buy a headset as I already have a good set of headphones.
Anyway it's kinda sorted as with negke's moral support / mocking disbelief, I hacked apart the stand from the desk mic and cut a notch so it can clip onto those headphones, hey presto DIY headset. Apparently it works although the quality is quite poor.
Well Done
#605 posted by negke on 2010/01/03 12:48:16
It remains to be seen if you're ready to face Biff in an Ellis competition. Maybe some of the things mentioned in the FAQ can help improve the sound quality to an acceptable degree.
At the very least, you can do classic 11khz Shambler roars now.
Hah.
#606 posted by Shambler on 2010/01/04 14:32:43
Worked in game last night but apparently Biff was usurped by his nephew so didn't get to do an Ellis-off...
This Is Awesome :D
#607 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/01/15 10:29:11
On Raid 1 Setups
#608 posted by necros on 2010/01/19 00:41:38
if you have a set of identical hdds, but one of them already has data from a non-raid setup, is it possible to create the raid 1 set without loosing the data without having a third hdd to temporarily store the data on?
Necros
You will lose all data when you create the raid array.
Ok, Thanks
#610 posted by necros on 2010/01/19 08:50:30
i couldn't find any information about what happened since most raid info pretty much assumed you were using brand new disks.
#611 posted by Spirit on 2010/01/19 09:39:18
Be aware that RAID1 is only protecting you from harddrive failure. It is not a backup at all. You do not want RAID1 unless you are running a highly important service.
SSDs Are Crazy, Good SSD Are Better
#612 posted by Jago on 2010/01/20 10:46:37
Playing with my 80gb Intel X2-M G2:
http://jago.pp.fi/temp/SSD-LOL.jpg
For Comparison
#613 posted by Jago on 2010/01/20 18:48:25
80gb Intel X25-M: http://jago.pp.fi/temp/SSD-LOL.jpg
1,5tb Seagate Barracuda: http://jago.pp.fi/temp/HDD-LOL.jpg
Note that the Barracuda isn't really a "slow" disk at all, its actually one of the better traditional mechanical disks, it's just that NAND media wipes the floor with everything.
For A Second I Thought The Two Graphs Had The Same Scale,
#614 posted by grahf on 2010/01/20 20:43:23
Then I looked at the numbers, hehe.
Past 16MB the HDD has the lead in write speeds, is that because of a larger cache? Does it matter? Rendered irrelevant through the huge difference in latency?
SSD Writes
#615 posted by Jago on 2010/01/20 21:22:22
SSDs traditionally lose in raw sequential write throughput, but dominate in read speed and minimal latency (we're talking a difference of 7-8ms to 0.1ms). There are SSDs that have excellent writes as well, for example the Intel X-25E and a few others that push above 190mb/s writes, but these are enterprise grade drives where a 80gb disk will cost you over 650-800 euro.
As For MBs
#616 posted by Jago on 2010/01/20 21:24:18
The numbers you were looking at are not MBs, they are KBs. The test reads and writes 256mb files in blocks of 0.5, 0.1, 2, 4, 16, etc.
I Guess It Doesn't Matter So Much
#617 posted by grahf on 2010/01/21 03:06:04
If you put your OS and favorite games on the SSD, then you would mostly be reading that data, not writing it.
Lesson Of The Week
#618 posted by Jago on 2010/01/25 16:35:25
No matter how smart and cunning you are when implementing your bulletproof storage solution, you are a complete retard if you expect "reasonable" performance from a disk controller card attached to a 66 Mhz PCI 32bit bus.
Individual disks on the controller: 75mb/s reads and writes
2 disks on the same controller in a mirror: 48mb/s reads and 28mb/s writes.
Linux GUI
#619 posted by Jago on 2010/02/04 01:56:34
http://jago.pp.fi/images/linux-menu.png
This is how you make a nonshit Linux GUI.
And
#620 posted by Jago on 2010/02/04 02:00:10
this is if you want to start digging: http://jago.pp.fi/images/terminal.png
SSDs Are Now Mainsteam
#621 posted by Jago on 2010/02/05 01:01:38
100 euro gets you this: http://jago.pp.fi/temp/intel40gbssd.png
Intel 40gb 2nd gen SSD, perfect for a budget performance system, great read speed, awesome 0.1ms seek time, but pretty low write speed.
200 euro gets you this: http://jago.pp.fi/temp/SSD-LOL.jpg
Intel 80gb 2nd gen SSD, the true overall best consumer SSD, double the cost not only gets you double the space, but also noticably higher read and write speeds
#622 posted by necros on 2010/02/05 01:36:11
how could you consider that mainstream? 40gb is just barely enough for your os, and maybe a few content creation applications and a single game.
I Prefer Stuff That Doesn't Share The Acronym For
#623 posted by meTch on 2010/02/05 02:14:40
Super Self Destruct
Err, Exactly
#624 posted by Jago on 2010/02/05 02:14:46
That's what it's ment for, not for storing 1080p movies.
SSD Drives
#625 posted by Vigil on 2010/02/05 11:12:04
You can get 6 times more storage capacity for quarter of the price compared to the Intel drive. Hardly mainstream yet. I could see them as supplemental drives, though, at the moment.
Even budget laptops these days come with 320GB.
#626 posted by JneeraZ on 2010/02/05 14:01:59
The general thought among the engine team here is that SSD will be common place in ~2 years. By then they'll have the kinks worked out, they'll be a decent size and the price won't require a bank loan to get a good one.
|