Thats What I Call A Big Fire
#529 posted by Jago on 2006/07/22 04:56:24
Crazy Underground Russian Tunnels.
#530 posted by Kinn on 2006/07/23 12:28:58
http://www.funmansion.com/html/Underground-City.html
There's a link posted earlier by Jago with some, but not all of these pics it seems.
I Am Stupid
#531 posted by Kinn on 2006/07/23 12:38:00
of course they can all be found here:
http://russos.livejournal.com
ATTENTION PHOTOGRAPHERS OF THINGS THAT WOULD OTHERWISE LOOK DECENT
#532 posted by Lunaran on 2006/07/23 18:26:12
Stop taking "HDR" photos. They look like shit. Bracketing your exposures and then photoshopping them together to crush the exposure range into 0-255 not only isn't HDR, it drains your image of depth and color, puts ugly haloes around things, and is a moronic amount of effort for a result that looks indistinguishable from a quick Filter->Other->High Pass in Photoshop.
Knock it off. Please.
Lun
#533 posted by R.P.G. on 2006/07/23 18:32:09
You're just jealous.
I'd Agree With L00n
#534 posted by Vondur on 2006/07/24 01:23:21
HRD destroys all the shadows making pics all fullbright. and we all know how we hate fullbright, right? hdr looks sharp but synthetic and lifeless...
Lunaran:
#535 posted by metlslime on 2006/07/24 03:05:12
I assumed that they HAD simply done a high-pass filter. It's pretty ugly in some of those photos.
Yeah
#536 posted by bambuz on 2006/07/24 03:59:21
One probably needs better, calibrated displays and dark rooms for the viewers too so photographing can advance, so that it can show realistic bright and shadowy stuff. These hacks are not good.
Interesting idea though, use all the bracket photos, since the CCD dynamic range isn't as good as film. It's just done somehow very wrong here.
Related:
#537 posted by metlslime on 2006/07/24 12:41:47
There was a siggraph paper that talked about taking two photos, one with a flash and one without, to get a crisp photo with accurate lighting.
Basically it used the flash photo for all the crisp, in-focus details, but used the no-flash photo for the color and brightness of the ambient lighting. Not a pro-quality solution, but this is software that the average dude with a cheap camera can use.
http://research.microsoft.com/projects/FlashNoFlash/
Regarding Photos
#538 posted by bambuz on 2006/07/25 04:33:27
I nowadays never use flash. It just destroys everything about the original setting and atmosphere. I'm planning on moving to a F 1.9 seventies Canonet and 800 or 1600 film for dark environments (tested it a few years ago, there is some noise but the photos have atmosphere too). I don't really like B&W either. doh. How limited technology still is today.
Flashes Suck Ass
#539 posted by than on 2006/07/25 10:47:09
I really hate flashes, but I'm no photographer, and holding my camera still for a couple of seconds to get a long exposure of a dark scene is a pain in the ass and prone to blurry results. When it works, the results are way better though.
Flashes
#540 posted by Lunaran on 2006/07/25 12:56:39
I really hate flashes, but I'm no photographer, and holding my camera still for a couple of seconds to get a long exposure of a dark scene is a pain in the ass and prone to blurry results.
that's why actual photographers use tripods :)
I Find
#541 posted by bambuz on 2006/07/26 06:56:58
you can very often find a place to lay your camera on or support it against. Big tree trunks are better than tripods, since if you push hard enough (with an SLR the "shoulder" the lens and body form is good), it's completely standing still. Also, some table or ground and just put something under the camera to do the vertical alignment.
Tripods are never around when the situation comes and they are ~never robust enough. :/
I also like to use manual focus, since otherwise it's always fucked up (in this way only like 30% of the cases, especially if there's not much time.) Of course that's a pain in the ass with cheap new cameras.
Yay
#542 posted by bal on 2006/07/26 07:19:04
Tripods are always around when you always have one with you. =)
I used to do like you bambuz, find somewhere to push my camera against, but having a tripod is much much better, and alot more stable.
Photozzzz
#543 posted by czg on 2006/07/26 10:16:49
For once BoingBoing is useful/interesting:
http://pingmag.jp/2006/07/24/japan-underground-photography/
(No, this is not that old photoset of the G-Cans project.)
Old Iron Mines
#544 posted by metlslime on 2006/07/26 13:01:07
More Half-Lifey Than Half-Life
#545 posted by BlackDog on 2006/07/28 12:05:55
Crazy Russians
#546 posted by tron on 2006/07/31 17:48:00
http://www.abandoned.ru/
More abandoned locations than you can poke a stick at.
?
#547 posted by Zwiffle on 2006/08/01 22:28:36
Why would you poke a stick at abandoned locations?
Well
#548 posted by tron on 2006/08/04 14:08:51
It's better than poking a stick in crowded locations, which just tends to annoy people.
And How Is That Better?
#549 posted by HeadThump on 2006/08/04 14:42:59
Hey you! You at the other table. Pass me your salt.
#550 posted by wrath on 2006/08/04 17:21:14
Fuck you. Get your own salt.
Ha Wrath!
#551 posted by HeadThump on 2006/08/04 19:48:44
Where the hell have you been?
Are you going to eat those?
#552 posted by wrath on 2006/08/05 06:39:53
I'm like Det. Lt. Somerset, I'm around...
Just finished playing through hl2and hl:ep1. Valve knows how to make games. Jesus christ, do they ever...
In fact, they might as well come to your house, piss on your floor, and punch you in the crotch. "We're Valve - and you are all snivelling shits next to us."
And no, I'm done, though I've slightly touched one of them with the tip of my penis, and you don't know which one. Bon Apetit!
As Long As They Dont
#553 posted by nitin on 2006/08/05 18:34:45
piss on my rug, it's all good.
|