Developer Vs Player - A Timeless Classic!
#26 posted by zlz on 2009/09/08 20:36:33
Just come down guys, I can understand your point of view - but I think you took it a bit to personal. Didnt mean to degrade any of your work, nor to say i got any mapping skills at all. As I said I didnt even made the q3 conversion, why I called it 'conversion of converted q2dm1', and didnt remember who made that one.
To name Willtis wasnt relevant, because everybody knows that.
I posted the map here because I think its a cool site and i thought some people might wanna have it BECAUSE it was so close to the original.
The understand the argument that it wasnt worth to convert in the first place only, if I look at it from the 'developing' perspective.
That's the problem, we got here.
Because I dont care about any textures, lighting or other fancy stuff. I guess with my cfg and picmip settings I wouldnt be able to see stuff like that anyway.
But in terms of gameplay, design and item placement the edge is such a clever made map, which most of the mp maps today are simply not.
I also prefer the original textures, because I love the old q2 look.
Its totally ok you deleted it, because this is your site and you can do whatever you want.
kk?
And when I said wolf has some similarity with the horrible CoD I was talking about the MP. For me thats what matters in a rtcw sequel.
I also attached a picture of a PigMonkey
#27 posted by JneeraZ on 2009/09/08 20:59:01
"not staying long..."
One can hope, but I have a feeling this won't end anytime soon. They care so little, they're posting novels.
Everyone
#28 posted by ijed on 2009/09/08 21:08:48
Tends to overreact, it's the internet.
Willem was just making an observation though.
PigMonkey for RemakeQuake . . .
I Dont Know Man.....
#29 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/09/08 21:16:53
....chill out a little.
People like Willem and Megmn always go on about licenses and copyright because they have to deal with the real side of it.
Hobbyists and Quake1 modders have had huge epic battles over the issue in the past. Some of the guys here actually hate some of the other guys because they will/wont release the sources to their mods (!)
Its not an argument which is going to be resolved on this thread. There have been threads dedicated to the topic in the past which have failed to do anything except spread bad karma.
Which is, btw, what you are doing, or trying to do by flame baiting everyone here.
TBH converting a hugely popular Quake2 map to QuakeLIVE is kinda cool but I think somewhere between trying to encourage you to re-make the map from scratch, or in a format which people can actually PLAY the map online, this has gone horribly wrong.
Now there's one or more person with their feelings fondled, and animosity has sprung out of a bit of fun.
And some people are just enjoying the argument, others are participating AND enjoying it.....
Hmm
#30 posted by nonentity on 2009/09/08 22:11:09
I don't care about his/her non-points
Only I may award non-points.
So far Willem has 2 for righteous anger, the 'mapper' has 4 for 'making' the thing in the first place, his cohorts have -23 for general idiocy and Sham has 17 for approving it as news and starting this whole argument.
Also, my first map was a box. Full of crates. (rly. it got 0.5/5 from Zan at MPQ)
#31 posted by inertia on 2009/09/08 22:12:11
Some of the guys here actually hate some of the other guys because they will/wont release the sources to their mods (!)
Or, we (I?) just hate the noncooperative/non-positive-sum nature of closed-source hobbyist modding.
Nonentity
#32 posted by ijed on 2009/09/08 22:20:51
Where's the league table link?
Inertia Re: #7
#33 posted by HEY on 2009/09/08 22:28:52
Off the Ho Chi Minh trail!
#34 posted by bwahaha on 2009/09/08 22:31:17
Should we just stand around waiting to get our ears raped with repetitive crap about copyrights "because someone has to deal with the real side of them"?
I don't think so.
Someone should go back to working on the real side of them, and perhaps fuck off, instead of repeatedly jumping up and down about some shit that will never be relevant, in a thread that's now dead, thanks to people like him with a giant stick in their ass.
Is iD going to sue this guy for copyright infringement on a hastily made rip of someone elses rip of one of the maps that they freely distribute with a patch? NO?
Then shut your fucking mouth about it.
BTW, I do make maps textures and models, and I have repeatedly helped others start making them who've asked me "how can I convert this map, since I'm not any good with brushes?"
#35 posted by JneeraZ on 2009/09/08 23:01:46
You don't care though. Let's make that perfectly clear.
Zlz
#36 posted by Shambler on 2009/09/08 23:03:45
I'm sorry for the controversy caused with this, and I'm sorry if deleting the news item is the wrong thing to do.
I don't feel as strongly as other people on this site about copyright abuse, but I do feel the resulting arguing and several very bitchy anonymous posts (NOT yours explaining your side, they are fine) are not beneficial to the site nor communication about mapping. Ideally metlslime would move this to a discussion thread and perhaps something useful could be hammered out about the role of copyright in non-profitable conversions and whether they should be promoted.
Well The Way I See It
#37 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/09/08 23:06:39
Is that these guys are actually doing more good for the community in many instances than bad.
I attacked Lunaran for critiscisingone of my projects in the past, but ultimately Lunaran was a cool guy to have on the 'board, and he actually had many-a valid opinion.
We dont always have to agree on everything. The best thing is to agree to disagree
#38 posted by call it what you will... on 2009/09/08 23:40:50
When your regs sit around here posting negative crap all day, shitting on other's contributions and statements without evidence and instead resorting to ad hominems because they have no actual point, you can expect quite a few bitchy posts.
I doubt "willem" gives a crap about what's beneficial to your site unless it directly effects the number of people subjected to reading his mindnumbing elitist responses.
PS:
anonymous posts are not anonymous when the IP is quite visible above them.
effectively there are no anons here so why should anyone bother to register a name?
So we can have uber cool colored letters on top of the posts that about 3 people read and then shit on?
OK, Look Man, Listen:
#39 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/09/08 23:56:27
Fuckoff.
Ive tried being reasonable and explaining myself here, but your just not listening. Try saying something remotely constructive, set an example of the level of conversation you are prepared to pitch.
I mean this is getting old. OK, we get it, youre pissed off, you blame Willem, you're smarter and cooler than he is and you know what everyone else is thinking. Old news.
New News:
Go away and leave unless you have something to add other than defensive abusive vulgar comments. Please.
Lol. What A Kafuffle.
#40 posted by Text_Fish on 2009/09/09 00:30:12
To be honest, posting anonymously [a person would have to impress me GREATLY to make me bother memorizing/backtracking their IP] marginalizes anything the poster wanted to say. Unlucky anon(s), your hard-fought argument is ultimately worthless.
Anyway, ZLZ clearly isn't a bad person and obviously didn't intend to cause offense.
#41 posted by you dont get it do you? on 2009/09/09 00:37:54
apparently you guys can dish it out with gusto when some new mapper puts up something he spent a little time on, but you can't take a bit of criticism from an "anon" when you take 15 seconds to post some absolute tripe.
I'm not surprised.
For the record, I haven't said or implied any of the shit you just mentioned, and you're just grasping at straws and mouthstuffing to develop some semblance of a reason to post.
your comments went from "peace love and let everyone just disagree" to "fuck off" in the course of one hour, when I didn't even address a comment to you.
I think we know who is the reasonable one here, and it's not you brother.
I understand your point: Some criticism is useful. You don't seem to understand the ones I was repeatedly trying to get thru:
1. All criticism is not useful, like spirits "Your map is fugly"
2. People crapping on this guys map contribution and declaring it illegal are not doing anyone any good.
3. Copyright laws are only applicable in their country of origin if the someone who actually holds them cares about the content covered, not all over the fuckin net like some sort of all encompassing commandment from god
#42 posted by TBH on 2009/09/09 00:41:44
I don't care if you are being honest. You're still displaying the very same sort of attitude that would lead a person to conclude that you think you are something special (iow an elitist prick)
Get the fuck over it, it's a little colorful name above a post. The content of the post is what matters not how many times you've +1'd someone else's comments to swell your postcount, or how long you've been a member at whatever forum/board/community.
Shambler
#43 posted by zlz on 2009/09/09 00:47:56
Don't be sorry, you did nothing wrong.
Im going to drink some beers now, which is always the best thing to do.
and remember!
208.57.237.156
#44 posted by Text_Fish on 2009/09/09 01:01:48
The little colourful name above the post helps to create a broader picture of the poster and better contextualize what they're saying. First impressions are very important, both online and off. My first impressions of Ricky and Willem have both been very positive, so although I don't agree with them one hundred percent of the time, I am more willing to thoroughly read what they have to say because I have some assurance that they won't waste my time. My first impression of you is not good, as my only experience of you has been this ridiculous thread overflowing with angsty bullshit.
You clearly want your opinion to be heard and respected [otherwise why bother posting it?], yet you're completely unwilling to open yourself up to closer scrutiny by revealing anything more than an IP address. All this suggests is that you're ashamed of the rubbish you're spouting, and don't want it to come back and bite you in the arse on a future visit.
And yes, compared to you I do think I'm something special, but that's not saying a lot.
You'r Like One Of Thoze Annoying Little Doggies
#45 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/09/09 01:27:09
that just yaps on in an angry fashion.
And has a brain the size of a golf ball.
Just trying to advocate a less immature response out of you. CZG? Is that you!!?
#46 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/09/09 01:30:42
I'm Confused...
#47 posted by AEnoch on 2009/09/09 01:32:05
It's acceptable to use copyrighted textures from another game in a Q1 map, but it isn't to convert a map?
#48 posted by so... on 2009/09/09 02:09:54
advocating a more mature response out of someone who disagrees with you, now takes the form of telling them to "fuck off" and never come back?
You sure make a ton of sense "Ricky". Try again.
btw "fish"
Why would I be ashamed to come back here, and how would me putting a name on my posts make a difference at all, when the IP is there on every single one?
I got linked here from some other board, where people had commented that you seemed to be so far up your own asses you couldnt see daylight, and after readin this thread decided that they were absolutely right and that you seemed like the types who'd flail around stupidly if someone called you on your crap.
I was right, just like I am about you thinking that your opinion matters, and that you think you're hot shit.
I'm battin a thousand.
Thread Of The Year
#49 posted by ijed on 2009/09/09 02:27:28
What A Hoot
#50 posted by Lizard on 2009/09/09 02:47:20
Looks like a piece of history. Wish I'd have donloaded the bitch now. Looked pretty lame at the time.
|