You Can't Have
#26 posted by Zwiffle on 2007/04/24 17:13:12
a one-candidate race. That's a monarchy.
France
#27 posted by inertia on 2007/04/24 18:07:20
Of the two, I support Royal. But I don't think she would bring France back to the Renaissance or anything ;)
Zwif's Got A Point
#28 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/24 19:32:50
The other guy seems to be racist towards middle easterners and pro-Bush, so I don't like him.
There would be no better way to stick it to Bush then to open a chilled bottle of French Champagne on the day he leaves office and just before the next nightmare administration really begins.
JPL,
#29 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/24 19:45:29
Are you really talking about politics here?
Superficial I know my statement was, but it is impolite to talk about domestic, structural problems in another man's country, esp. when the same may exist and be even greater in my own ;) So keeping it lite is the best course until a Frenchman decides the issues need better elaboration.
Royal Vs Sarkozy
#30 posted by JPL on 2007/04/24 20:38:18
I'm interest by how you guys are seeing the race externally even if your comments are "superficial" and not "deep into politics arguments", it is suitable for me: at least it will be funny :D
And I don't want to compete with Bal: let me be fair and let him win.... No revolution please :P
Put This Thread Back From Where It Done Came
#31 posted by Blitz on 2007/04/25 01:38:30
That is, the proverbial unwiped ass of the universe.
Do we really need a thread dedicated to inertia and Headthump stroking themselves vigorously with some ideological Vaseline in the mirror of their own beliefs?
You Can Join In
#32 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/25 05:02:29
for a threesome if you like; I do like my bitches who whine and squeel and scream a lot.
The
#33 posted by inertia on 2007/04/25 05:58:25
point of creating thread, blitz, was to isolate the discussion from people who aren't interested in reading or talking about this stuff.
thus, sparing them the need to make comments like that.
Blitz,
#34 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/25 06:02:36
so you come in a thread more than 24 hours after all of the previous acrimony has been expressed to raise some stink and at the same time declare yourself oh-so-above-it-all in that prisspot manner that you have perfected. Yeah, your pretty fucking logical. Twit.
Hmm
#35 posted by Zwiffle on 2007/04/25 07:19:16
Inertia and Headthump have found their Napolean Bonaparte.
Eh
#36 posted by Blitz on 2007/04/25 08:42:36
My apologies to inert and Headthump...that was a bit out of line.
I guess I've just been frustrated with the state of func_msg lately...it seems like lately I've been seeing nothing but nitin's movie reviews (which I enjoy) and long rants about politics and ideology and what not.
Now that's to be expected since we're primarily a Quake-centric community, but I get frustrated when I find myself enjoying the tone and pace of other level design boards immensely more than func/Qmap which I used to get really excited about. I like giving feedback on screenshots and playing betas and talking about design.
On other level design boards, someone makes a non-sequitur about something and it might get a laugh or more likely just be ignored and expected as part of the fabric of silliness.
Here, lately, a remark about that same something gets a lengthy dissertation about it, and no one gives a shit.
(Replace "something" with "Warren G. Harding" for a concrete example)
So, again, my apologies.
The
#37 posted by inertia on 2007/04/25 09:13:40
lack of vitality and humor could be due to the lack of quake mappery that has hit these parts lately :/
Inertia
#38 posted by scar3crow on 2007/04/25 09:54:34
To which I direct you to post numbers 16 and 17 =)
Blitz:
#39 posted by metlslime on 2007/04/25 10:19:24
I kind of agree that there seems to be less and less mapping talk on here, but I think the reason is that some of the more active members aren't mappers. And many of our active mappers have become less active or gotten too busy to map.
Metslime
#40 posted by JPL on 2007/04/25 12:50:34
As a mappers, I'm very busy on several fronts: beta testing, and mapping... So don't complain please, some good news will come soon.... :)
#41 posted by Trinca on 2007/04/25 13:05:35
go fuck your self with politics who gives a shit about it? they just want to eat our money!
go fucking map
Trinca
#42 posted by JPL on 2007/04/25 13:08:10
It's quite a good summary !!!
Touche, Trinca
#43 posted by Zwiffle on 2007/04/25 16:23:16
That had the directness I would expect from a Portuguese, with the poetic feeling of madfox, and a little hint of czg thrown in for 'wtf.'
Touche indeed.
Is There More To Life Then Mapping?
#44 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/25 18:24:44
Maybe not. Some might say programming, or modeling&animating, or texture painting, and some of us bent assholes might even say 'politics'. But we are just kidding ourselves. Mapping is all there is of any value. Those other things only hold value to the extent they give mappers something to use.
Blitz, apology accepted, the 'twit' comment stricken. No grudges held.
Headthump:
#45 posted by metlslime on 2007/04/25 20:42:06
The reason we put a premium on on-topic discussion on this board is that there aren't a lot of alternative sources of quake mapping discussion. I can get discussion of movies, politics and philosophy from many, many websites.
I don't want us to talk less about movies, politics, or philosophy. I only wish we talked more about level design.
I Hope #44
#46 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/25 22:03:52
come off as a case of sarcastism, something I don't view very highly; it was tounge and cheek and at the same time iterated a general agreement with Trinca.
Really, getting in a political discussion started off as a means of dealing with a bad 50+ hour case of insomnia last weekend and not meant to be a tipping point to a thermo nuclear war, but those things happen.
Missing Word 'didn't'
#47 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/25 22:04:49
as in 'didn't come off'
Sarcastism ? Bleh -- Delete The T
#48 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/25 22:05:47
Toilet Paper
#49 posted by bambuz on 2007/04/27 04:07:47
what's the reason for new found obsession in it by the american politics nowadays?
A short dissertation will do.
Lol -- I May Be Wrong
#50 posted by HeadThump on 2007/04/27 04:38:30
but I think it began with a recent entry the singer Sheryl Crow did on her blog about limiting
the use to one square for each go, three for realy tough ones; I didn't follow this closely so don't know if she meant political or personal edict.
|