|
Posted by Doom4 on 2008/05/08 02:47:10 |
Doom4 has been announced, id are looking for people, if you are that person, and are good at what you do, have a look.
http://www.idsoftware.com/
Doom4, discuss it or not. |
|
|
#373 posted by Spiney on 2014/02/12 21:45:50
You can do 'pleasing visuals' in any generation. Tech might evolve but aesthetic principles are universal.
Also
#374 posted by Spiney on 2014/02/12 21:47:17
'Just because we can' proves a terrible design methodology on a daily basis.
^^
#375 posted by mfx on 2014/02/12 21:49:45
That�s so true!
#376 posted by Killes on 2014/02/12 22:10:47
I really think it would be something to see a serious company revert to an older, simpler engine, hire top of the line artists and gameplay designers and focus on simplifying/streamlining asset creation, removing any engine limits and especially insuring a constant pure 60fps that never ever ever waivers from that ONCE.
Stick to it hard, believe in it, and do it fucking well! Then make sure the marketing campaign focuses on placatingthe "bwahaha its old tech" bad press to make sure people give it a try.
Sounds Great.
#377 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/12 22:14:32
...and doomed to sales failure :P
Although To Be Honest....
#378 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/12 22:16:02
....Dishonoured kinda did that. Strictly previous-gen GFX standard, looked a lot like Source....BUT strong theme, strong style, and great gameplay. Dunno whether it will set any trends but it was certainly a good game.
Mm
#379 posted by bal on 2014/02/12 22:22:07
Valve does this continuously no? TF2, Portal, L4D, they are all art and design over crazy visual tech, and with a fairly dated base engine (source).
And yes, all three of those are great games.
Good Point, Well Made.
#380 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/12 22:53:42
#381 posted by Spiney on 2014/02/13 01:32:22
Valve do all kinds of technical innovations in each game, just the rendering that's lagging behind.
#382 posted by Spiney on 2014/02/13 01:42:44
I really think it would be something to see a serious company revert to an older, simpler engine, hire top of the line artists and gameplay designers and focus on simplifying/streamlining asset creation, removing any engine limits and especially insuring a constant pure 60fps that never ever ever waivers from that ONCE.
Sounds like Rage. It was lighter than Doom3 in a lot of ways. They just pulled all the stops art wise with the unique texturing.
Shame they couldn't put in 200 gigs rather than the 25 they ended up with. Hope they stick to the pipeline, Rage is almost unmatched artistically.
What I'd really like is to render racing-the-beam style. I play Q3 at 250 fps on my 60hz monitor and it's a way smoother experience than if I vsync. If we could take an old-tech approach and just send scanlines to the monitor that would allow for really low latency and you could run everything at a much higher pace. Actually I think 60 fps is kinda tame, go 600 fps and have your screen evenly divided into 10 tearlines :P
That would be perfect for an e-sport kinda marketed game.
#383 posted by Kinn on 2014/02/13 03:22:22
Hey guys what's goin on this thre- Oh.
It's Coming.
#385 posted by Spirit on 2014/06/10 22:16:00
What cunt put no space between Doom and the 4.
Guess What
#386 posted by Spiney on 2014/06/10 22:27:36
BROWN
Fuck
#387 posted by killpixel on 2014/06/10 23:02:35
yes
My Doom 4
Couldn't sleep so I was thinking about this new Doom. They shouldn't have made it take place on earth. I know it's logical (Doom 3 was a remake of Doom 1 and this would be a remake of Doom 2: Hell on Earth). However, back in those days we didn't have the graphical power to accurately display earth in a game. So many games already take place on earth and I for one have a hard time imagining Doom on earth without losing that typical Doom feeling. Darksiders did it and although it was a great game, the earth sections we're definitively the weaker parts. Besides, as a sci-fi horror fan, I think it's a setting that's underused.
Instead they should focus on what made Doom 2 great. It was more open, it had bigger fights and a larger scale overall. I really hope they don't try to mimic COD and stick to smooth run and gun gameplay with hordes of demons. No RPG stuff please. Also, they suck at doing story driven stuff. If I were them I would take a good look at Aliens and the Dead Space games for inspiration. Make it a sequel to Doom 3 and have it start with a marine battalion being sent to Mars to investigate the distress calls. Have it take place on the ruined UAC basis and hire a talented writer.
For context I would start by focus on finding out what happened. After that, the focus should be on retrieving the gate that allows the demons to come through. You could make it that the marines have to retrieve that gate, get it on board of the ship so it can be shipped to a space station where scientist can figure out how to close it for good. Of course ending in sending you with the marines though and finish it off in Hell. This allows for a variation in settings (Mars, space ship and station (Dead Space) and Hell). I would have the game switch between moments you are alone (tension, horror) and moments you work with squads. This should help pacing. You could also use zero gravity for some awesome fights (again, Dead Space).
Drop in and drop out coop would be a given. Have players team up against the demons. Also, full fledged multiplayer, including a horde modus and of course mod support (which is unlikely due to IdTech5 it's nature). Biggest selling point would be massive fights that aren't scripted. So you got big set pieces but not the COD kind. Destructible environment, secrets and no more monster closets. Also, well lit environments (let it make sense) and dark where it needs to be. No switching between flashlight and gun. No mandatory vehicle sections please unless it works in the game's advantage.
That's what my Doom would be.
Uh... Looks Like My Post Got Deleted Somehow...
...but I have the sneaking suspicion this is gonna be some more of what we don't need.
Gameplay on rails, RPG elements, mandatory vehicle runs... you know, that groundbreaking stuff that make you go "WOW! This is fuckin' useless and pretestuous!".
The Silent
Yeah, another Quake 4
The demons have UAC on their guns. I suppose this means it's going to mean "experiment gone wrong" rather than opening a gate to hell.
#392 posted by JneeraZ on 2014/06/11 12:40:15
Pretestuous?
At any rate, I wish they would adopt a stylized look rather than the hyper realistic stuff. Faster rendering of enemies means MORE enemies on the screen. Get back to that arcade feel of the original Dooms. Fast movement, lots of enemies, story be damned.
But they won't, of course.
#393 posted by JneeraZ on 2014/06/11 12:41:42
Also, getting back to tactical choices during combat would be nice. Who's the biggest threat in the room? How can I deal with it? Attack it directly, start an in-fight, shoot a barrel ... maybe take out the smaller dudes first to clear the field a little ...
Don't just teleport 2 imps behind me and call it done.
Hit The Nail On The Head!
I'm also less interested in hyper real graphics. I'd rather have something that isn't quite state of the art and something that simply stays true to the original game. I think the new Wolf game modernised the game without sacrificing on the gameplay mechanics.
Did I Get That Word Wrong?
Well, sory 'bout that.
#396 posted by JneeraZ on 2014/06/11 14:48:28
Just not a word I've ever come across ... even half stumps Google.
I Think He Meant Pretentious.
;)
|
|
This thread has been closed by a moderator.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|