.
#3756 posted by [Jimbo] on 2004/03/16 15:18:47
All good maps, but not the ones I'm looking for
:(
One of the maps uses the explosion effect that
CZG uses in his recently released SP.
the base map has a path over slime ala doom,
and some enforcers and grunts come up on a lift
partway across the bridge.
Quake1 & XP Pro
#3757 posted by Mike Woodham on 2004/03/16 16:12:03
I want to run Quake on a laptop. Can I run it on a Celeron under XP Pro with Quake.exe 1.06? I get a SIGEGV error.
Mike
#3758 posted by Vondur on 2004/03/16 16:13:13
No, get Winquake or GLquake.
Vondur
#3759 posted by Mike Woodham on 2004/03/16 16:16:10
Speedy response or what!
Thanks Vondur
Maybe The Terra-X
#3760 posted by aguirRe on 2004/03/16 16:25:18
3-map pak from CZG? In the first map there's something similar to what you mention and in the 3rd there are explosions in a lava cave.
It was released Aug 2002, I think. I've tried to find a d/l link but I don't remember if it was officially reviewed. I think I got it directly from a link CZG published then.
Terra Pack
#3761 posted by czg on 2004/03/16 16:29:00
Is theoretically still in development, is theoretically still a "quick side project" and was never officially released. I don't think I've got any downloads for it around atm. I dunno if someone here has got it tucked away though...
Yes
#3762 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/03/16 16:29:23
czg's Terra maps were not officially released.
Czg
#3763 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/03/16 16:31:40
Stop stealing my posts.
Also, I should still have it.
Never Mind The Bollocks
#3764 posted by czg on 2004/03/16 16:32:56
Since I know how to use a FTP prog, I uploaded it again to http://stud.aitel.hist.no/~christig/dLoads/terra-x.zip
.
#3765 posted by [Jimbo] on 2004/03/16 17:52:35
YAY thats it!
Good Stuff CZG
Is it still a work in progress?
IE. would you accept submissions of maps from other authors?
Also, was your plan to have an episode in each of the three styles of your 3 maps?
If Only For The Title...
#3766 posted by distrans on 2004/03/16 22:53:35
#3767 posted by czg on 2004/03/17 02:23:13
Is it still a work in progress?
Yeah, but I haven't touched any of them in a year or so now.
IE. would you accept submissions of maps from other authors?
Well, I was going to do that at the start, that's why I shared these three levels so people might want to tag along to make an episode of minimaps. Nothing really happened with that though, so if I ever finish it it'll prolly be a set of levels just from me. Also I don't want to try and organize any 'community map pack' because then I'd end up with 2-3 maps from other people laying rotten on my HD for a few years until I myself can be arsed to finish it up, and I don't want the blame for that. : /
Also, was your plan to have an episode in each of the three styles of your 3 maps?
No, not really. The plan was to make an E1-ish episode; Progress from base, through medieval, to runic. Only this would be with smaller, (perhaps) more polished maps. I was aiming for 7-8 maps. So far I've got 4 finished + 3 cancelled + 1 in progress + 1 that evolved into februus.
Distrans
#3768 posted by LTH on 2004/03/17 08:10:13
Mmmm, video gamers who are socially active and would spend hundreds of dollars to get to a social event in "not killing each other" shock.
Of course violent video games don't incite Hulk-like rage in *everyone*... but are they enough to tip latent psychos over the edge?
LTH
#3769 posted by - on 2004/03/17 08:23:14
Seeing a butterfly is enough to tip some latent psychos over the edge.
The Question...
#3770 posted by Fern on 2004/03/17 08:35:24
isn't really whether video games can provide the necessary stimulus for an already violent person to go out and kill people. They obviously can. And if there weren't any violent video games, then something else (football, religion, butterflies, racism, etc.) would push the same people over the edge anyway.
But are the positive effects of video game violence even worth trading off with the negative, no matter how demonstrably small the latter may be?
Fun > You
#3771 posted by nb on 2004/03/17 09:10:41
Considering said tradeoff can only really ever be made at the personal level, the point is moot.
The More Relevant Question
#3772 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/17 10:18:45
'But are the positive effects of video game violence even worth trading off with the negative, no matter how demonstrably small the latter may be?'
Is increasing the power of already over activistic governments over the choices you make in your life worth it in regard to solving a non existent problem?
Eh, I Blame Sheryl Crow
#3773 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/17 10:21:07
for my bad spelling in the morning. I took 'I like a good beer buzz early in the morning' a little too literally.
#3774 posted by LTH on 2004/03/17 11:25:59
nb - No, it's not, because a latent psycho would make the 'wrong' choice :)
HeadThump - good, yes, let's let companies rule the world. Bye-bye Medicare, NHS, free education, food stamps, welfare.....
Companies Completely Take Over
#3775 posted by - on 2004/03/17 13:10:36
...and hello porn in advertisments!
I'll take that trade off
So You Are Saying
#3776 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/17 13:20:35
to even be cautious in the matter of expanding government power threatens the existence of 'Medicare, NHS, free education, food stamps, welfare.....' and leaves us at the mercy of Robber Barons?
Amen Scampie
#3777 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/17 13:24:09
People complain about advertisements and commercials but that is governments fault too. They band the use of subliminals. If companies were allowed to use subliminals, they could make commercials at 1/3000th the length of current commercials, and more effectively pull you in at well. Another example of market effeciency being undermined by the government.
Eh, Too Much Guinness For This Mic-Spic
#3778 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/17 13:25:06
that's 'banned'
Yes But
#3779 posted by LTH on 2004/03/17 13:35:25
Then we'd all be knife-edge psychos. They might as well put fet in the water supply, consdering how twitchy we'd all be...
#3780 posted by LTH on 2004/03/17 13:35:39
(of course, this is a moot point for Scampie)
|