Too Funny
#3665 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/05 09:54:20
'the sidelines are mostly crushed babies.'
I spat out my nose laughing so hard. Good stuff.
Scampie
#3666 posted by LTH on 2004/03/05 13:17:49
I'm amazed that such intolerance still exists today. You're pathetic.
Yes
#3667 posted by - on 2004/03/05 14:33:08
I hate niggers, queers, blackies, jews, europeons, faggots, homosexuals, coondogs, russians, hispanics, athiests, yids, and mappers named LTH.
Evillair Remakes Q2 Textures For Q3:
#3668 posted by metlslime on 2004/03/05 14:48:44
http://evillair.net/textures/eq2.htm
(not just Q3 ... pretty much any game that uses higher-res true-color textures.)
Metlslime
#3669 posted by FaTbOy! on 2004/03/05 14:50:41
nice! Thanks for posting something constructive.
Thanks Metlslime
#3670 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/05 15:52:53
I'll have to see how EvilLair's
textures compliment my own Xatric redux.
'not just Q3 ... pretty much any game that uses higher-res true-color textures.'
There is one outstandingly good texture artist, I can't remember the name, he has a site on Polycount, who specializes in Industrial and Social Realist like designs who does limit the use of the textures to Q3 only. I don't get it but I'm glad not everyone is so fickle.
Headthump:
#3671 posted by metlslime on 2004/03/05 16:59:55
If you think of the guy's name, please tell me. I'm curious what social realism in a texture set would look like.
I Found It,
#3672 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/05 17:32:24
and I can't believe Rorshach's name excaped my memory.
http://www.planetquake.com/polycount/cottages/rorshach/index2.shtml
Jackboot and Singlemalt in particular have elements of social realism in my opinion (the good old fashion Soviet kind and the more ironical modern type that you find on the covers of Don Delillo novels and 1970's print adds).
#3673 posted by - on 2004/03/05 17:56:05
Rorshach doesn't limit his textures to q3 only, the reason most of his textures are in .bmp format is so they can be converted to whatever game you need them for. He only restricts commercial use, or if someone wants to use them in a contest map.
Well...
#3674 posted by metlslime on 2004/03/05 18:02:27
I don't think that qualifies as social realism. It's more an ironic romanticization of dystopia in the style of 1984, Brazil, and their ilk.
Thanks For The Clarification
#3675 posted by HeadThump on 2004/03/05 18:36:09
When I went back to the site to get the info Metlslime requested I realized upon scanning his terms of usuage that that was yet another one of my misinterpertations. Somedays, some lifetimes, my moniker fits extremely well.
Metlslime -- I saw it as ironical too. I wonder how you would duplicate the more sincere forms of Social realism. To get that feel of Havana during the 60's turmoil or Stalingrad during the war would be interesting, the results would be menacing.
ever read Lucius Shepard?
Lth
#3676 posted by wrath on 2004/03/05 19:54:27
Ohmigod, this isn't water, it's gasoline!
or...
Are you going to walk off my lawn peacefully or do I have to hook the pressure hose to the septic tank again?
Hmmm
#3677 posted by LTH on 2004/03/06 06:38:48
That sounds like what we call an "empty threat".
Lth
#3678 posted by wrath on 2004/03/06 09:00:04
Welcome to the internet.
Seriously
#3679 posted by LTH on 2004/03/06 10:34:43
I don't understand a) how people can be so casually intolerant and
b) that nobody else here dared pick you up on it.
Hmm
#3680 posted by nonentity on 2004/03/06 11:04:25
It's not really casual intolerance, it's casual insults. There is a subtle difference.
And the remade Q2 textures are really nicely done. However, having made a map with them (you'll see in about a week), the colour is far too monotinous. Mixing them with the Q2Waste set Lun did works well though.
No Sense
#3681 posted by madfox on 2004/03/06 11:28:16
I't's good to have the abuse in general
mostly I have the mistake in commen
sometimes I get the idea of reason
but mostly I have the pretention for saken
Grindy
#3682 posted by LTH on 2004/03/06 13:24:26
It's both, and the latter I don't mind. Just the use of 'gay' as an insult I find offensive.
#3683 posted by - on 2004/03/06 13:30:37
that's becuase you're gay.
...not that there's anything wrong with that.
LTH
#3684 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/03/06 14:34:32
Now, see, if I were to say "Fuck you", then the virgins around here would take offense. And that would be a lot of people I would offend.
Or
#3685 posted by - on 2004/03/06 14:44:24
you could say someone is 'dumb' and really offend all the non-speakers here.
...
#3686 posted by wrath on 2004/03/06 17:11:05
political correctness is way out of style
Hmm
#3687 posted by nonentity on 2004/03/06 17:37:54
But surely the duality of meaning that is inherent in the English language, combined with the context leads any reasonable man to see it as an insult only, rather than a statement that someone is homosexual. Anyone who can't is a fucking faggot.
Hmm
#3688 posted by nonentity on 2004/03/06 17:38:42
(Or as a statement of intolerance towards homosexuals)
Nonentity
#3689 posted by wrath on 2004/03/06 18:10:32
#3687 gets my vote for post of the month. #3688 was just redundancy.
|