 Thats Not A URL!
#341 posted by H-Hour on 2004/01/05 16:09:26
That was supposed to be "director / screenwriter / whoeverisresponsible" in the post above.
 H-hour
#342 posted by nitin on 2004/01/05 19:36:41
yeah, that's basically what I was saying in my earlier post.
 Err...
#343 posted by distrans on 2004/01/06 22:26:45
H-Hour, I actually thought the extended FOTR was brilliant.
 Random One Setence Recently Seens
#344 posted by Maj on 2004/01/07 12:03:52
Pirates of the Caribbean
Good old plain fun action movie, Mr Bloom's sleepwalking nicely balanced by Miss Knightley's heaving bosom.
Donnie Darko
Brilliant, original, dripping with atmosphere, only slightly spoiled by Miss Barrymore's autocue reading and the slight impression of a puppy jumping up and down and squeaking "look! look! I'm so clever and referential".
 Network
#345 posted by nitin on 2004/01/08 08:36:19
saw this last night. Pretty good and very funny in parts but IMHO it was covering way too much territory for there to be any real focus. Still, good stuff.
 Network
#346 posted by metlslime on 2004/01/09 02:08:24
Something about this movie made me watch it again immediately. I guess I liked the mood of the movie and was trying to soak it up or something.
Also i had this theory that Diane had somehow snuck into Howard Beale's bedroom that night he had the vision, but unfortunately it didn't fit the facts.
 Network
#347 posted by nitin on 2004/01/09 08:14:06
I think what cracked me up the most was Ned Beatty's monologue to Beale, that just came out of left field without any warning.
 I Loved...
#348 posted by metlslime on 2004/01/10 02:25:50
the interactions between the extremist group and Faye Dunaway's people.
 Let's Move On To Clause E
#349 posted by nitin on 2004/01/10 03:03:18
Subsidiary Rights.
 Recent Viewings
#350 posted by nitin on 2004/01/25 07:19:01
Buffalo Soldiers - good premise, decent first twenty minutes but either the scriptwriters wee changed after that or forgot to go to their complete quota of scriptwriting classes because the rest is absolute garbage. Pity because there was potential here.
Confessions of a Dangerous Mind - Quite good, quirky and enjoyably humorous. Bit fleeting in its take on the subject given the dark subject matter but maybe its better done in this fashion as the original story is ridiculously unbelievable anyway.
Finding Nemo - Very good, but no Toy Story. On par with Monsters inc though. The Psycho touch was nice with Darla.
Lost in Translation - Extremely good, albeit a bit slow. Also genuinely funny even though it relies heavilyon stereotype mockery. Nice uncontrived ending to finish up with too.
Once Upon A Time in Mexico - Complete garbage. What was Johnny Depp thinking when he accepted this? He's the only half decent thing in this film (although there probably wasnt enough of him) but not even he can save this atrocious film. Lackluster action sequences too BTW.
 Oh Yeah
#351 posted by nitin on 2004/01/25 07:20:34
if anyone coudl suggest a few more films I should check out, that'd be helpful as I'm nearly through my DVD stack anyway. Here's what I currently have :
http://www.dvdaficionado.com/dvds.html?cat=1&id=nitin
Here's what I'm getting in the near future :
http://www.dvdaficionado.com/dvds.html?cat=2&id=nitin
 Nitin..
#352 posted by leviathan on 2004/01/25 08:41:40
Requiem for a Dream
 Suggestion
#353 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/01/25 13:44:39
Waking Life. Although it may be found to be pretentious.
Also, Underworld is rather poor IMO. Visuals are nice, though, if I recall correctly.
 Underworld...
#354 posted by metlslime on 2004/01/25 18:36:14
IS rather poor.
 Replies
#355 posted by nitin on 2004/01/26 02:08:33
leviathan,
yeah I've actually been meaning to rder that, keep on forgetting.
RPG,
I've seen it and liked it, it was too cool to let the semi-pretentiousness get in the way. but it made me very dizzy on the two occasions I saw it so that's why I never bought it.
As for Underworld, I'm getting it mainly for my siter and the visuals. If it's compelte crap, I plan to resell anyway.
Any othe suggested titles?
 Nitin
#356 posted by H-Hour on 2004/01/26 07:24:30
I have seen three other movies with Audrey Tatou and, while they're not as good as Amelie, they are still good if you are as in love with her as I am.
Happenstance - Best of the three.
He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not - Decent movie until the twist, when it gets better.
L'auberge Espagnole - Cheesy, but it's French so it doesn't bother me as much. This one is probably worth passing up.
Also, State and Main is a good movie. Funny, it's about Hollywood taking over a small town to shoot a movie there. The characters are all just really good, and Philip Seymour Hoffman always picks good movies.
 More One Sentence Bollocks
#357 posted by Maj on 2004/01/26 09:12:57
Requiem for a Dream - Visually interesting, spoilt for me by deeply unappealing characters (and Ms. Connelly doesn't get her baps out), but lots of other people seem to like it.
Memento - Definitely see at least once, certainly the most original film I've seen in years.
Twins Effect - Usual oriental sword nonsense, great fights spoilt by dull comedy.
FLCL - Possibly the best thing ever, only spoilt by the fact that it's not a movie.
 H-hour
#358 posted by nitin on 2004/01/26 20:41:37
thanks for those but I dont really like Amelie as much as a lot of other people. I thought it was above average with some cool visuals and music which is why I have it.
State & Main, I'll try to check out.
 21 Garms
#359 posted by nitin on 2004/01/29 00:50:47
saw it a coouple of nights ago and it's very very good. Initially it feels a bit gimmicky with the structure but the more you get into it, the more you appreciate the skilful storytelling rather than noticing the gimmick.
And the acting is very very good, made it a bit hard to watch in some scenes personally. Only thing I didnt like was the end monologue but it doesnt detract from the rest of the film.
Oh, and Ms Watts seems to have a thing for explicit sex scenes.
 Um... Hi
#360 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/02/01 19:04:59
Go see Big Fish if you can.
 RPG
#361 posted by HeadThump on 2004/02/02 00:40:09
The premise certainly looks good, but I was curious whether or not Burton seems to be trying too hard to be weird. Not that a great movie can't have its flaws, like Ed Wood, wow. For an entire week I couldn't stop myself from in the same manner as Johny Depp doing Ed Wood. My closest association to a movie -- there was a breif period of time when I was but a wee lad <que the magical awe inspiring transitional music>, and the movie Blue Velvet was being filmed near by in which the 'ear' prop you see at the beginning was in my possession for safe keeping. I got to know some of the people who worked on the set. It was very realistic in feel but it had a nasty latex smell to it.
 Uhm
#362 posted by HeadThumping on 2004/02/02 00:42:13
'from <insert verb> in the same manner '
<cross-dressing>? No.
<talking> yep that is what I meant
 Ed Wood
#363 posted by nitin on 2004/02/02 01:07:54
depp and landau provide two of the best comical performances ever in that film.
 HeadThump
#364 posted by R.P.G. on 2004/02/02 09:23:47
Big Fish is not a weird movie. Yes, there are a few fantastical elements (how can you have a tall tale without fantasy?), and a few sets that are reminiscent of more typical Burton fare, but over all the movie is a story about a man coming to terms with his dad's quirks.
 Well, Then
#365 posted by HasdThump on 2004/02/02 10:36:46
I'm putting it on my schedule for next week end.
|