#3589 posted by metlslime on 2010/11/01 01:42:26
There's a Nikita series remake on right now, when the original series only ended in 2001.
But the original movie is from 1990...
True
#3590 posted by nitin on 2010/11/01 01:46:52
they're rebooting spiderman too which is even more recent.
The Thing btw is meant to be a prequel I think, not a 3rd remake.
Hell....
#3591 posted by metlslime on 2010/11/01 03:24:05
they rebooted "The Hulk" only 5 years after the previous one... that's gotta be a record.
Yeah
#3592 posted by nitin on 2010/11/01 04:17:46
but that deserved a reboot :)
As Does Brokeback Mtn
#3593 posted by Drew on 2010/11/01 05:16:11
obviously.
As For Needy Reboots...
#3594 posted by mwh on 2010/11/01 07:21:56
Are they going to try to do the northern lights/the golden compass again? Because the 2007 one wasn't very good. Maybe they'll get to do the other books next time..
A Symptom Of Hollywood's Ever-accelerating Demise
#3595 posted by negke on 2010/11/01 10:11:32
I'll watch them online and won't even be needing to feel bad about it. Arrrr!
#3596 posted by necros on 2010/11/01 20:56:34
they should reboot batman before the third rebooted film comes out.
Recent Horror
#3597 posted by ericw on 2010/11/02 04:32:16
enjoyed the suggestions, I'll have to check out a bunch of those. The Descent was fantastic.
re: Antichrist, the slow-motion intro seemed really arrogant and turned me off, and I didn't watch any further. I guess I should give it another chance though :-)
If you liked Let The Right Ones In, check out Ginger Snaps (not really horror, but has horror elements.)
Antichrist
#3598 posted by Tronyn on 2010/11/02 05:16:58
yeah I actually didn't watch it longer than that the first time either, and I know a friend who didn't watch it because of that, heh. It gets a _lot_ better.
Ginger Snaps Was Actually OK
#3599 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/02 10:25:56
Especially the first one. I remember watching the third one and thinking IT was actually OK - set a couple of hundred years ago. Bit like Ravenous. Love the music of that film!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeOGSIkAgZU&feature=related
Missing Recent Horror Films
#3600 posted by ijed on 2010/11/02 13:32:46
Mirrors 2008
The Ruins 2008
They were both very good.
Although
#3601 posted by ijed on 2010/11/02 13:35:45
Metacritic tells me they both got panned in the reviews.
The House Of The Devil 2009
#3602 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/02 14:05:31
Good film, soooooooo classic 80s horror.
Great Bunch Of Responses Now I Have A Ton Of Stuff To Check Out
#3603 posted by Tronyn on 2010/11/02 14:41:09
oh Ravenous, still one of my favourite movies ever, the soundtrack of course makes it even better. Such a cool take on the "people getting picked off one by one in some isolated outpost" horror style, with such awesome black humour, "Isn't this civilized?"
The Thing
#3604 posted by Vigil on 2010/11/02 18:19:21
I think that's actually a prequel to the 1982 film, not a remake. So it gets a pass, I guess?
Should Also Plu
#3605 posted by nitin on 2010/11/03 01:47:20
Dgo Soldiers, Neil Marshal's precursor to The Descent. Obviously not in the same class, but pretty decent low budget werewolf film with a good sense of wickedness and humour.
Hehe
#3606 posted by DaZ on 2010/11/04 01:54:20
Yeah, dog soldiers is awesome =)
The History Of Superglue...
#3607 posted by ijed on 2010/11/04 01:59:01
The Crazies (2010)
#3608 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/11/04 03:21:29
Good bit o fun. If you like that kind of suspenseful, pseudo-zombie film in the same vein as the Dawn of the Dead remake then you would probably like it. If you're like Asaki and won't just enjoy a fun movie just because it's a remake then you're a poop.
Lol
#3609 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/04 03:52:27
I saw that, was OK, quite tense.....
Anyone else like Cloverfield? That sprung to mind. I think that made me poop.....
Cloverfield
#3610 posted by nitin on 2010/11/04 07:30:40
was enjoyable, but you have to put aside the fact that all its major scenes directly rip off a better movie from before.
But its definitely enjoyable enough.
Crazies remake is in my evergrowing pile of stuff to watch (currently at 137).
#3611 posted by Spirit on 2010/11/05 16:54:14
If I think Micheal Cera should be stuffed into a pig's arse and then fined in a grinder for being ugly, annoying and pretentious, is there any chance I would like Scott Pilgrim?
#3612 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/11/05 16:57:10
Well it's not just Michael Cera that sells the movie. It's sort of the culture aspect too. I found the film to be alright, not as amazing as my friends thought, and not that director guy's best work. I prefer Shaun or Hot Fuzz to this film any day. But it alright. Defo some entertaining bits and interesting characters.
Few Mainstreamers I've Vegetated In Front Of Recently
#3613 posted by rj on 2010/11/05 17:32:26
the a-team - gloriously silly OTT action with a bit of comedy. very enjoyable!
iron man 2 - also very silly but not in such a good way. i actually thought the first one was excellent as far as superhero movies go but this was just all flash & no substance, too many cheesy/cliched/stupid bits, mostly poor acting. downey's main character isn't even likeable. give it a miss
robin hood - felt more like the start of a series (like the first lotr) than an epic in its own right (despite being 2.5 hours long somehow). was interested in the take on history more than anything living in nottingham myself. decent fight scenes, mostly decent acting, average character dev, functional plot. nothing special in all but ok.
then for a laugh i decided to download prince of thieves and watch that to compare it with the above.. hadn't seen it in 10-15 years or so. it's so corny in just about every way it's unreal, haha. alan rickman is awesome though, only good thing about it
|