Func_Msgboard: Making A Game In Quakespasm, Yamagi Quake II, GoldSrc Or Cube 2?

Making A Game In Quakespasm, Yamagi Quake II, GoldSrc Or Cube 2?

Posted by Caesar on 2018/06/24 05:54:06

What are the strengths of each engine? Which would be easier to use? Is it possible I would I be able to use the QDOS or Q2DOS ports to make a DOS port of the game? Is it possible I could use vkQuake to make a Vulkan version? It wouldn't be anything too crazy except AI maybe. GoldSrc is also an idea but it's proprietary. Also Cube 2 but idk what Cube 2's sysreq are and I'm aiming for something that would run on a 300-400 MHz CPU.

Thanks in advance.

First | Previous | Next | Last

@anonymous

#26 posted by szo on 2018/06/30 22:56:42

Rendition, S3DTK And SGL

and those are still publicly available where?

#27 posted by jorava on 2018/08/03 00:44:47

What about this? Made for standalone games: https://github.com/klaussilveira/qengine

Chosing An Engine...

#28 posted by Mugwump on 2018/08/03 02:40:09

...also depends on the specifics of the game you have in mind. For instance, AFAIK the Cube engine is the only one that has a gravity flag that you can apply to any surface. This allows the creation of pretty wild Escheresque designs. I wish someone would port this feature to Quake...

#29 posted by anonymous user on 2018/08/23 21:56:23

Cube engine is great, no idea why it did not took off.

2 posts not shown on this page because they were spam

First | Previous | Next | Last

You must be logged in to post in this thread.