|
Posted by Shambler on 2008/03/23 19:35:32 |
Very interesting discussion in the GA thread, worthy of it's own discussion thread I think, for archive and research purposes.
There seem to be several viewpoints floating around, which I'll badly paraphrase...
Quake gameplay is the same as it always was (kill monsters find exit) and thus is boring and not really worth bothering with.
Quake gameplay is the same as it always was but that's it's appeal and it's still great fun.
Quake gameplay is the same as it always was and thus it needs to rely on mods and extra monsters and features to remain fresh and interesting.
Quake gameplay has evolved and improved enough (with or without those enhancements) to still remain worthwhile.
etc etc.
I don't think any of these perspectives can be shown to be right or wrong - mostly they seem to be the depth with which you look at gameplay and gaming in general. I.e. Quake gameplay might seem exactly the same as always when looked at on broad kill monster exit map terms, but looked at on narrower terms the refinement in monster placing, gameflow, surprises, balance etc etc that modern mappers have achieved could be seem as quite progressive.
I haven't argued much so far but as a big Quake fan I am interested in Quake gameplay, how it has progressed, and how far it can progress (with or without enhancements). Thus I think the ideas would be worth more exploration. More thoughts in a mo... |
|
|
Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss...
#272 posted by Preach on 2008/07/29 14:24:52
I think quake would benefit by more good bosses.
I agree with this, but I feel there are some barriers which are difficult to overcome. The best bosses are designed with their environment in mind - the map and the boss as designed in tandem. So some sort of compilation mod containing 10-15 ready made bosses for quake isn't going to produce great results.
On the other hand, if a boss was made specifically for one map, then one benefit is uniqueness; the reward for reaching the end of the map is something you've never seen before. The problem of course is that you need to have co-operation between a modeller/animator/coder and a mapper. I wouldn't mind giving this a go though, if someone had a map in the early stages and an idea of a boss.
In terms of gameplay, there's one question I'd like to ask about making quake bosses. Typically when you face a boss in quake there's no reason not to just continually fire on them with your most powerful weapon. What ways are there to break up this pattern?
Ways And Means.
#273 posted by Shambler on 2008/07/29 14:32:25
Firstly I pretty much loathe boss combats that are all based around some gimmick that involves not fighting the boss i.e. somehow know in advance that you have to destroy some arbitrary power crystal that looks like every other sodding part of the boss arena whilst getting pwnd by 200% damage projectiles and balancing on beams above lava. Fuck that shit homie.
Other options.
1. Boss manouverability / teleportation.
2. Other monsters present.
3. Varying boss vulnerability to weapons.
4. Necessity to use enviroment to help destroy boss (not total reliance).
5. Boss actually not very tough but very dangerous so tables have turned to survive rather than just shoot.
Yeah
#274 posted by megaman on 2008/07/29 15:06:30
Descent teleporting bosses have:
1. Boss manouverability / teleportation.
latter, kinda slow.
2. Other monsters present.
Some bosses even generate monsters.
3. Varying boss vulnerability to weapons.
Large invulnerable spots on the front. Sound is VERY important here though, descent has one default 'can't shoot this' sound all the time.
4. Necessity to use enviroment to help destroy boss (not total reliance).
Various goodies, missiles, invis, invulnerables in secret rooms around the boss room. This isn't what you meant though?
In descent it works kinda great, the bosses are the enemies you need to be most careful about, and they're fucking tough, but still managable, and very rewarding.
They're mostly very dangerous, but the levels don't just drop you in one giant room with em with no way to go, so you can see how you kill them best, etc. The room itself mostly has hiding places, etc. They're never just a box.
#275 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/07/29 15:32:54
I think quake would benefit by more good bosses.
I think Quake would benefit from nicer AI. Cleverer animation. Quality sound effects.
I know it's been done before, but it would be nice.
Preach
#276 posted by Lunaran on 2008/07/29 16:35:47
Typically when you face a boss in quake there's no reason not to just continually fire on them with your most powerful weapon. What ways are there to break up this pattern?
Selective monster/weapon interaction maybe? like shamblers taking 1/2 damage from asplosions. Your boss could be immune to lightning, or nails could ricochet off of him. Stuff like that encourages a certain weapon set/play behavior without absolutely requiring special behavior X (like chthon).
You can also reduce the player's stores of ammo by throwing cannon fodder at him for a while. If players tend to have too many grenades before a boss fight because you overused ogres early on, just make him wade through a sea of zombies, for example. A pair of shamblers will encourage the player to burn his nails/cells pretty quick too.
Bosses.
#277 posted by Text_Fish on 2008/07/29 16:47:00
I like having to lure bosses in to specific areas of the environment to reveal their weakness, as long as it's logical [and therefore obvious] enough. Somebody earlier mentioned making a level that involves discharging the LG in the water with a pentagram, so perhaps a boss that you can lure in to the water would be good? Obviously you'd have to script it so that the pent doesn't become available until the boss is in the water [perhaps it smashes some bars that made it previously inaccessible].
I quite enjoyed the big dragon at the end of the Rogue Mission Pack. Gravity Belt + Large Open Space + Fire Breathing Dragon = FUN. Shame about all the lava.
The best boss monster I've ever come across in any game would have to be the three tentacles in a giant silo half way through HL1, but that sort of thing requires complexity that would just seem out of place in Quake's dimension.
Boss Ai Huh
#278 posted by meTch on 2008/07/29 17:10:14
well ever sence i have messed with the ai i came to a bug, but more like a feature where chantion moves around in his lava, his move ments are kinda creepy and somtimes he will move in your way if the path and get his hit box to stop you, then u r dead cos u cant get by him
#279 posted by negke on 2008/07/29 17:11:18
Quake would benefit from nicer AI
See Nehahra. Most people seem to dislike the new monster behavior because they want to play Quake like they're used to - predictable.
An unknown but potentially cool boss has just been discovered at Quaddicted: The Anaconda. Nothing too special in the end, but impressive wakeup animation.
Initially unkillable monsters roaming the levels or chasing the player should be used more often. As for bosses, some slight modifications to the standard ones might make for an interesting change already. Obstacle monsters like the HL silo tentacles or the Xen trees are nice, too.
New Monster
#280 posted by Text_Fish on 2008/07/29 17:11:43
This afternoon I've been playing around with a new monster idea.
Monster Name: DreadGhast
When veteran deathknights have achieved all they can with the sword, they have been known to sever their own arms and legs in order to better hone their extra sensory powers. These 'DreadGhast' as they have become known by the few who have survived an encounter with one, have learned to levitate and are now capable of ten times the firepower they once were. Should you manage to bring one to the brink of death, then in one last vitriolic act he will erupt in a beautiful but deadly lightshow.
Attack1: The same fiery excretion as a DeathKnight, but more trails get fired in one shot. Can also fire whilst moving.
Attack2: Suicide bomb. DreadGhast only resorts to this when reduced to 1 HP. Body explodes, releasing a volley of above mentioned fiery trails in all directions.
Behavior: Floats around at slightly slower speeds than a scrag, but can take much more damage [three times that of a DeathKnight].
I've also used my very limited modeling knowledge to edit the DK model:
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a155/text_fish/DreadGhast01.jpg
I'll work on a proper skin at some point too.
Any opinions on the general idea?
#281 posted by anonymous user on 2008/07/29 17:19:25
Three times of a DK's health is a lot (750HP), I'd suggest giving him 450 (slightly more than the vore) or something. Also, getting an enemy down to 1HP doesn't happen very often, personally I'd rise that to 10% of his starting health (whatever you decide it to be).
Otherwise it's a fine idea.
Yea',
#282 posted by Text_Fish on 2008/07/29 17:22:15
I thought I might be going a little bit wild with the HP. :P
Good idea about the 10%. Thanks for the feedback!
#283 posted by Trinca on 2008/07/29 17:26:15
I like Armagon a lot :)
Dreadghast
#284 posted by gb on 2008/07/29 17:39:17
the model and idea are pretty cool, a floating torso seems pretty Quakey. Perhaps some particles moving around him. And part of his skin looking whiteish like the wizard. Lower part perhaps.
#285 posted by meTch on 2008/07/29 19:00:13
give him a blood trail i guess, i think u can do that in qme
Nice Discussion
#286 posted by ijed on 2008/07/29 19:24:16
2Cents
#287 posted by ijed on 2008/07/29 19:28:45
I'd like more bosses in Quake as well. I'll be making one for my pack, but not yet.
I reckon they should have the puzzle solving element of the original 2 and not be killable conventionally, but there's no need for such a behavior to be irritating.
I've Seen This In A Few Flash Games
#288 posted by Lunaran on 2008/07/29 19:30:01
but it could work in quake. People will often achieve snake/sandworm kind of things by having a bunch of segments that are all unconnected models but move in a line, with one following the next and a head at the end that drives the whole thing.
Text_fish
#289 posted by HeadThump on 2008/07/29 20:29:47
but I just saw HT's new Scrag and simply had to comment.
Quake's hordes should defy explanation. The scrag is scary because it flies without the aid of [big butterfly] wings, and doesn't have any arms. It's like a ghost.
A few weeks back, I stripped the wings from the scrag/naga and now it has spiked fins on the sides. I salvaged those wings, and now they are fitted for a flying worm demon like you see in Zerst�rer, Might&Magic and Arx Fatalis.
However, in the past few weeks since my system has been healed, I have been playing the games and packs I've been forced to give up over the last several months, so QExpo may be calling things a little short.
Still would like to do the Minimal thing for it, though. A stand alone that has the bare minimal amount of media material -- sounds, models, maps, conchar, etc, to stand on its own.
A wild blue tangent, but many may not be aware of this -- there is a relatively easy way to produce your own sounds. Get the Audacity Audio editor and learn its basic functions. Produce a short abrupt, sound, either through vocalization or noise generation, and put it on one track. Find the sound you want to mimic and put it on another track. Stretch the first sound out to be relatively the same size as the first. There are tools in Audacity that allow you to 'shape' the sound, use them to shape the generated sound to match the acoustic pattern of the sound you are mimicking. You will likely need to use other processing tools to get an acceptable sound, but at this point you'll have a solid basis, and you can go ahead and erase the sound you are mimicking. You will likely also not get a perfect duplicate, but then again, that is not the aim.
You can find examples of sounds developed this way for a Quake3 style hand held Cuisinart on my Mortisville site, if you dig into the index file.
HL1 Silo Tentacles
#290 posted by inertia on 2008/07/30 03:02:10
I have disturbing yet fond memories of the fucking noise that thing made.
Halfway
#291 posted by ijed on 2008/07/30 04:42:54
Between bang and clang.
It was a bit crap in Xen and the desert where it was just tapping on the rocks / sand.
HeadThump
#292 posted by ijed on 2008/07/30 05:06:05
That's an interesting sound hint.
I Have An Idea!:
#293 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/11/13 16:24:09
How about a mapping scenario which would require some progs jiggery-pokery - a "migration"!
You could have (for example) a ravine/gorge environment with a constant supply of monsters (say feinds for example) running into the map at one end through - for example - a cave exit which is too high up for the player to reach.
The feinds would then run through the entire length for the map, probably following a series of path_corner type entites to an exit at the other end. The exit could be at the other side of a deep trench, the monsters having to go through a monster_jump entity so that they could reach an exit which the player wouldn't be able to.
The players mission could be to carry out a mission for another exit, fighting humans or other non-migratory beings with the constant trickle of feinds running through the map. The emphasis being on running.
Or it could be a survival mission, with little weaponry and other monsters placed around the map.
Migratory monsters would only attack if attacked, returning to the path after their attacker is killed (in the instance of infighting)
Is their any way of doing this without new progs, Quoth or otherwise. It wouldn't be too difficult using the info_multispawn so long as THREE things I guess:
1 - the monster will move towards the first path_corner when spawned.
2 - the monster will spawn RUNNING
3 - the monster will not attack thre player on sight.
Please help me obtain fruition! I would love to put something like this in me episode...
#294 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/11/13 16:38:58
Fucking cool idea, Ricky! I love the idea of having a trickle of fiends creeping up behind you at all times. Keeps you moving and keeps you on edge constantly. That would be a neat element in any map, really. Monsters that walk a very long path and are continually spawning to fill up their ranks if any are killed. Would add a lot of randomness to the level.
I did a bunch of that sort of thing in 'White Room' although it might not have been too apparent. I have wandering code that makes monsters wander around instead of waiting for you to show up. Every monster was in motion when you encountered it in 'White Room'. I think that sort of thing is a lot more interesting than the norm.
#295 posted by necros on 2009/09/11 10:14:03
sitting around thinking about stuff... imagine this:
boss monster with unspecified normal projectile and melee attacks.
boring, but here's the interesting part. The attacks do a fair amount of damage but decent armour (green or yellow) is provided (that respawns) along with lots of megahealths (that also respawn).
the respawn time is short enough that getting health isn't really a problem.
the boss, unfortunately, has a self heal that can only be stopped by using explosives on it as well as a special attack.
the special attack is a stacking effect that gradually reduces the amount of health the player gets when they pick up a health pack.
So, let's say it does the special attack every 15 seconds (it is NOT avoidable).
each 'stack' of the effect reduces health gains by 5% (additive).
this means that after 5 minutes, the player would not receive ANY health when picking up health packs.
the challenge would be the race to blow the shit out of the guy while stopping it from healing with explosives before you stop being able to get health.
Just To Clarify:
#296 posted by necros on 2009/09/11 10:16:13
special attack goes like this:
you start the fight, a mega health gives you 100HP.
after 1 attack, you only get 95% health so a MH gives you 95HP.
after 2 attacks, you only get 90%.
3 = 85%
4 = 80% and so on and so forth.
|
|
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|