News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Film Thread.
I thought a trio of themed threads about other entertainment media might be good. If you're not interested, please just ignore the thread and pick some threads that interest you from here: http://celephais.net/board/view_all_threads.php

Anyway, discuss films...
First | Previous | Next | Last
Also 
THere is a brief segment of some really hot looking biblical-themed porno where someone was sucking on a nuns tits. Anyone know the name of that ? Maybe I'll check in the credits to see where it's from. 
 
Married Life (2007) - stylish, well acted 50's set drama that is predictably plotted but the performances from Chris Cooper, Patrcia Clarkson and Pierce Brosnan keep you watching.

6.5/10


Midnight Cowboy (1969) - great characters and generally well made, although it gets a bit self indulgent during at least one extended sequence and the ending (and events leading to it) is a little forced and abrupt.

7-7.5/10


The Square (2008) - well made aussie noir/thriller that borrows a bit too much from numerous better films and features a main character that is just not sympathetic enough, but overall its still a fairly enjoyable watch.

6.5/10


To Live and Die in LA (1985) - above average crime thriller which has a couple of extremely well staged action sequences (the car chase is great) but otherwise features a stock plot and characters.

5.5-6/10


Youth of the Beast (1963) - very stylish yakuza film by Seijun Suzuki which I did find distractingly confusing at times but it all comes together reasonably well if you stick with it.

6.5/10


Mongol (2008) - well made action epic about Genghis Khan's early days with a strong, understated central performance but also a ponderous and meditative tone for what really is a rather stripped down and simplistic narrative.

6.5-7/10


Wanted (2008) - above average brainless film that is enjoyable due to its sheer ludicrousness in plot and action, but is also let down by a badly attempted 'hip' attitude and some really cringeworthy dialogue.

5.5-6/10


Miss Julie (1951) - excellent, stylish film from Alf Sjoeberg Set on midsummer night of 1894 on the estate of a Count in Sweden with a very strong performance from Anita Bjork and some very good dissection of power in its various forms.

7.5/10


Old Acquaintance (1943) - well made melodrama which nicely pits Bette Davis' acting against Miriam Hopkins' mugging but some of the plot turns towards the end are badly rushed and/or highly implausible.

6.5-7/10 
Nitin, Just Wondering 
what's the worst film you've ever seen? 
BTW. 
Whomever was asking me about reading The Watchmen comic, well a mate insisted I borrowed it to read, so I did. I quite enjoyed it actually - mostly as a reminiscence about seeing the film. I'm glad I saw the film first because I had the benefit of the plot AND the style/action that way. I also prefered the film's endgame. 
Starbuck 
would have to think about it.

Thing is, these days I have a pretty good idea of what I will like (to an extent anyway) and avoid stuff I would truly hate.

300 would have to be up there though, although I think Casshern takes the cake. 
It Was Me Shambler... 
... and I'm glad you liked it.

Funny thing is that your feelings are the exact mirror of what I thought.

I kinda liked the film, mainly for the memories from the book that it evokes, but I prefer the latter. Especially the endgame.

I think this says a lot about the "imprinting" you get from something you get to know first... 
 
the internet tells me that Casshern is a live-action anime movie - oh dear. Yeah, I'd probably dislike that. 
Havent Read Watchmen 
for 5-6 years, but the film retains the essence of the comic I thought while amping things like action at the expense of character.

Is it better, probably not, the comic was created to be a comic and even though the movie is a decent adaptation, it loses things along the way. 
Starbuck 
but its meant to have 'awesome' visuals.

Assuming the dvd I saw was reasonably faithful to what was intended, 'awesome' has a far different meaning to what I thought. Havent seen a more vomit inducing visual style since or before. 
Starbuck 
Casshern looks pretty wicked. Saw the Japanese trailer for it a few years ago and pretty much flipped out. Looks like it's mainly story progression broken up with periods of over-the-top CGed action scenes. 
 
I saw Casshern once and I forgot almost everything about it. That should say all... ;) Didn't think it was thaaat bad. 
 
It probably would have been a lot more memorable if we saw it when it came out several years ago. The CG was probably cutting edge then, but nowadays good CG is like toilet paper. 
300? 
at first i was going to argue against this being among the worst, since it is a bad movie and quite dissapointing, but was at least memorable and somewhat distinctive.

Movies like Highlander 2, Avengers, and Catwoman are as bad or worse, though perhaps the problem is that the truly worst movies are actually quite forgettable, so it's harder to recall the exact level of badness. Like i'm pretty sure Zardoz should be on this list but it's kind of an indistinct blur in my memories.

(Interesting how Sean Connery is in so many of the above movies)

So 300 might not be the worst, but it may be equal peers with other worst movies. 
Zardoz?? 
oh come on, that movie is a classic! it's extremely memorable; where else can you see sean connery shot put a naked woman? 
Metl 
yeah I know, but I did put a disclaimer saying I dont watch stuff I know I'd hate and the ones you mentioned would fall into that category. As does I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry.

But out of stuff I've chosen to see 300 and Casshern would be my picks. 
 
necros: strangely, I don't remember that scene... :)

nitin: fair enough, I don't seek out crap either, but I sometimes get out-voted in group situations. 
Crap Movies 
So my friend and his wife invited me out to see a movie. Our choices were Hellboy 2 or Hancock. I wanted to see Hellboy 2. They wanted to see Hancock.

To this day, they refuse to refund me my money. 
Parts Of Hancock Were Good 
but yeah you lucked out, H2 is heaps better 
Aaargh! 
Why did I not see http://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=3545&start=2166&end=2166 earlier? Ok, maybe I would have thought "perfect plain hollywood popcorn for a saturday evening" but that would have been aimed too high.

Amazingly stupid and bad movie.

"Let's shoot that scene somewhere cool!"
"How about in some high snowy mountain scenery? We could play with like totally awesome camouflage and make it look like Hoth!!!"
"OK, Cool!"
"But would it make any sense?"
"No."
"OK, COOL!" 
 
Actually, what I wrote sounds remotely funny. The movie is shit, seriously. 
Spirit 
talking about Shooter? 
Oops 
Yes, indeed. 
 
Has anyone here seen Lachende Erben? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0024236/
It was banned in Germany by the Nazis and still kinda is (well, banned for minors so yay censorship!). Looks like a nice comedy actually but very hard to find. I wonder if it would be worth the effort getting it. 
Anyone Seen Man Who Fell To Earth 
very bizarre I must say... 
Filmz. 
Let The Right One In.

Cool, atmospheric, slow paced. Impressively retro clothing, I shall now assume all Scandinavians dress like that especially computer game mappers. Nice relationship between the two kids. I thought the vampire kid was well cool, I like some of the scenes where they're chatting casually/awkwardly with blood dripping off her. Quite arthousey and quite good, quite a good blend of genres too. I'd have prefered a little bit more bite and tension tho, and a bit more exploration of what it was like being a vampire.

Rating 22.75 - 23.05 / 28.95

Zoo.

Mrhands.wmv explained. Or, rather, not really. An entirely tasteful and again semi-arthousey docu-drama about bestiality. Which to be honest does some of what it says on the tin, but not nearly enough. It's quite well done and shows the different and curious characters involved (MrHands himself coming across suitably weird), and shows their....dedication to bestiality. But it doesn't explore the pathology nearly clearly enough, nor answer pressing questions like: "Why do you want a horse cock up your arse??". In it's quest for tastefulness it leaves too much unanswered, and I still don't "get" bestiality from it.

Rating: 12/21 - 14/20 / 25/27 
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.