 Usual Whiny Feedback
#241 posted by dwere on 2016/12/14 13:41:11
I was recently pretty surprised to discover that the "picking up two or more megahealth packs in a row" bug is still present in AD. I think someone came up with a fix a long time ago?
 Engine Update Required
#242 posted by sock on 2016/12/14 13:42:48
Okay so I just did my first test map for rotating objects using the AD .fgd! Wow, that was kind of a letdown for obvious reasons(no collision/fake collision).
Not a knock on AD as it's fantastic Mod made with existing tools and played in existing engines. Why haven't the main compilers and engines incorporated rotation with collision into their source?
I guess I mostly mean Quakespasm and Eric's tools. I know about DP already but hmap2 is not widely used so not a consideration really.
I spoke/argued with eric over the engine implementation of rotators in the QS engine for a long time. I wanted the same system as DP used because then it might become a good standard that everyone could use!
Unfortunately the QS team will not implement it because it is not a straight forward change and can affect backward compatibility. Maybe if more people in the community were vocal about this issue then things might change.
Maybe MarkV/Baker could implement the DP rotating system and then someone could make a map for it! That is the usual (crazy) way things have to be done in the Quake community! :P
So for the moment we are stuck with Hipnotic QC hack rotating stuff which is just terrible for 2016 style mapping. Rotating collision can easily handled by the engine and will allow for rotating machinery to properly interact with the player and projectiles.
#243 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/14 13:57:58
I had plenty of plans for water monsters in AD
So... are you saying that you put these plans to rest? That would be a shame, especially regarding the Hydra: this bugger can also attack you when you're out of the water, paralyzing you in the process. That could be used for some interestingly wicked situations.
Then there is the technical problems of monsters not reacting to water with different movement speeds
That's akin to saying "let's not use fiends because they can't navigate stairs and tight spaces properly"... Learning how to use a monster efficiently is the mapper's job. Yours as the project lead is to provide content and gameplay opportunities. Let the mappers deal with these problems. I surely am not the only player who needs tougher and more varied aquatic monsters.
 At Least
#244 posted by Qmaster on 2016/12/14 13:58:21
Could we add necros awesome swinging gate from altar of storms?
QC Hack:
Hrmm, yes having to manually add blocks to create the collision is a cheatyfaced hack by any standard and brings along the ever annoying and long standing issue of colliders not ever rotating hence 45 degrees being 1.44 or so larger than 0.
 Lmfao Mugwump Demanding Content From Sock
#246 posted by Kinn on 2016/12/14 14:21:42
Learning how to use a monster efficiently is the mapper's job. Yours as the project lead is to provide content and gameplay opportunities.
Wow
#247 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/14 14:22:58
Underwater content, yes, because while AD greatly expands the above-surface bestiary, it still doesn't have more than vanilla underwater. Plus, Sock just admitted having had plans for this. I'm only asking him to consider bringing these plans to fruition.
#248 posted by Kinn on 2016/12/14 14:27:27
He did consider it. Concluded it sucked donkey balls. As the project lead it's his prerogative to make that call.
 @sock - Re: True Rotation
#249 posted by Baker on 2016/12/14 14:30:43
I'll see if I can do a true rotation implementation in Mark V in the next few days.
It will need tons of beta testing to assure compatibility. I once saw a Nehahra bug report for a different engine (Qrack) that appeared to involve true rotation and found that to be disturbing.
The main difference is someone interested in doing the QuakeC support (progs.dat game logic for anyone reading this who doesn't know what that is) ... since I almost exclusively only do engine code. Without QuakeC support in an mod that gets use, the engine modification by itself doesn't mean much ;-)
Testing in DarkPlaces would also need to happen to make sure everything works (essentially) the same. DarkPlaces physics code is not the same as the classic engines in some ways, making it unclear at times if a behavioral difference could happen.
/No promises since I haven't thought about it much lately, there could be a red flag I have forgotten, but aside from that possibility, seems very plausible.
 Water Combat
"water combat in Quake is terrible"
I was going to disagree and compare it to something like Descent but the movement speed in Descent is much higher and snappier.
I will still be interested in creating a water map at some point, I'm guessing the scuba gear powerup was included in the 1.5 update?
 @Mugwump In Regards To #142
#251 posted by xaGe on 2016/12/14 16:10:38
That black background issue must be a Windows only problem I think, because all the Linux builds in those same nightly's run AD 1.5 just fine.
#252 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/14 16:32:21
Thanks for your input, xaGe. I got the issue fixed by deleting conchars.lmp as per Sock's instructions. I'd still like to know why this happens only with 1.5 and not with 1.42.
@Fifth Yeah, the scuba gear is featured in Swampy.
Just swimming alone in Quake is slow and boring, nevermind doing underwater combat.
#254 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/14 16:57:48
swimming alone in Quake is slow and boring
Well, you can't expect underwater movement to be as fast as land movement. As for boring, I respectfully disagree. The limited air supply and search for surface or pockets of air can bring some tension if the map is well constructed. And restricted speed can be another tension-inducing factor in combat situations, further enhanced by hydras and their paralyzing attacks.
 Water
#255 posted by topher on 2016/12/14 17:36:30
water and swimming can be interesting
i always liked grizzly groto. is very 'other dimension/whatever', with impossible fluid mechanics of underwater areas that should be flooded.
and the map of than 'apsp2' is very good too.
 Floods
#256 posted by mjb on 2016/12/14 17:40:29
The mechanic of being able to move water brushes in AD would go a long way I think. I am ignorant on how feasible that would be but I can imagine using the flood/drain gimmick to make interesting scenarios!
 Glub Glub...
#257 posted by xaGe on 2016/12/14 17:41:46
It would be nice to see more water/under water content in maps at some point. If only to add a few monsters. Say repurpose a few more along the lines of the Hexen II squid? A shark would cool, but then someone would actually have to model one.
Underwater sunken, lost, or ruined city type maps would be neat to see I would think. Swim, fight, find rooms still with air under water, etc etc...
 Moving Liquids Are A Massive Hack.
They're allegedly so bad that:
1. necros refused to put them in Quoth.
2. sock opted to do make a fake trigger_touchsound for Zendar that looks and sounds like water.
 Touch
#259 posted by mjb on 2016/12/14 18:19:50
Sounds nasty indeed.
I was looking at the trigger_touchsound but couldn't find an example of it. I'll be taking a look at the zendar garden fight section!
 Well.
#260 posted by Shambler on 2016/12/14 18:34:44
if playername=Mugwump;
then replace monster_fish with monster_tarbaby & monster_shalrath;
force r_wateralpha 1
Surely??
 Har! Har! Har!
#261 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/14 20:51:03
Speaking of tarbabies, is there a way to make them move slower underwater? I'm guessing it would involve some QC editing. This isn't an AD-specific question but I'm posting it here since it pertains to the current discussion.
 Slow Tar
#262 posted by mjb on 2016/12/14 20:57:26
Not quite what you are asking for but spawns in AD have a flag to make them jump a whole lot less. They become much less spastic with it set.
#263 posted by Mugwump on 2016/12/14 21:22:53
Thanks Bloughs but it's about underwater speed, not jumping, and I'm also asking for vanilla. That said, what's this AD flag?
 RE: The One Person Who Rated AD 1/5 On Quaddicted
#264 posted by lpowell on 2016/12/14 21:46:26
This is one thing the Quake community is missing: the kind of trolls e.g. on doomworld/idgames who give out zero-star ratings and angry reviews while admitting they didn't even finish the first map of a release. You see at least three of those commenting on every major WAD. Quaddicted had some good times with hkBattousai a while back, but we need more!
#265 posted by dwere on 2016/12/14 21:57:26
It's also missing the troll release culture, but I guess with Quaddicted not being notable for trying to host every malicious turd for "archival purposes" it'd be pretty hard for something like this to emerge.
A precedent is required.
|