#24013 posted by skacky on 2014/02/04 22:43:16
Here's a cool video on Dungeon Keeper, regardless of your liking or hatred for TotalBiscuit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DJmS7prcmE
Skacky
#24014 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/04 23:30:00
Are you basing that on it being a 'Thief' game, or being a game in it's own right??
Basing That On It Being A Thief Game
#24015 posted by skacky on 2014/02/04 23:46:40
Since it has the Thief title. If it were named something else I couldn't care less, but as a Thief title it stinks.
I See No Need
for them to hijack the thief brand if they're going to dismiss everything. There'd be a shitstorm if DC sold the rights to Superman and they basically retconned the original storyline and villains. Yeah he's no longer from Krypton or called Kal-El, he wasn't raised on a farm and Lex Luthor is no longer the badguy. But he flies and wears blue spandex so he's still Superman.
How about no? If the main character was not called Garrett then fair game tell a new story and keep the name Thief, hell make Garratt a side character who taught the main character the Thieving craft. But don't throw the baby out with the bath water, FFS.
Well In That Case,,,
#24017 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/05 12:14:31
"Whatever homie"
Maybe tippex over the box art and loading screens so it says something else instead??
People could and did say exactly the same thing about Doom 3 and Wolfenstein reboots, but they were still good games in their own right.
I Disagree In The Case Of Doom 3
#24018 posted by SleepwalkR on 2014/02/05 12:40:29
Which was not a good game in its own right. I found it dull and boring gameplay wise.
I Enjoyed Doom 3
in a way.
It doesn't really have the problem of Thief as the game never really had much of a story. It was a horror game and I don't think at the point it was released it would have worked as a 90mph running shooter.
Looking back I think mistakes were made, id were trying to blow people away with tech (which is historically what id did best), but I think at the point when it was released that we were more than satisfied with the graphics of games of the day. Even Rage was an expensive and needless under-taking with the graphics, it was beautiful but the game wasn't there.
id should have been making lower risk games, like quake 3 was, to please fans. Even Carmacks favourite game is Q3.
And Id's Worst Game By Far...
#24020 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/05 13:26:38
Is Q3A.
I Disagree With That So Much.
I actually love Quake 3 a hell of a lot. It's one of the most perfect multiplayer shooters of all time, great balance and gameplay. Graphics are still lovely too.
I Would Love It Too...
#24022 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/05 13:50:18
...if it didn't have a horrible floaty feel, appallingly broken damage feedback, indistinct player skins, juvenile bouncing items and arcadey aesthetics, no pretence at single player at all, and in general had rubbish feeling MP gameplay compared to Q1, Q2, and UT all of which I was enjoying at the time.
The engine was quite nice though.
Then Again...
#24023 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/05 13:52:40
...I guess this shows something. I'm not judging it because it is a failed pseudo-sequel to Q1 or Q2. I'm not judging it because it uses the Quake name. I'm not judging it because of it's relation to an established franchise.
I'm judging it purely on it's own merits. Or rather I would, if it had any.
FWIW even HL2 deathmatch with it's sluggish movement and weapon changing, felt far more fun gameplay.
Well that argument has convinced me to see the error of my ways! - said no-one on the internet ever. ;)
Yeah I loved it and I still play Quake Live today. I enjoy the arcadey-ness of the game, and I don't even care that the singleplayer is just bot matches :P
Not Much Of A Q3A Fan
#24025 posted by SleepwalkR on 2014/02/05 14:34:19
I'm not sure what it has to offer in terms of better multiplayer game play than Quake 1.
#24026 posted by Spirit on 2014/02/05 14:59:45
lol bler, you must have mixed up UT and Q3A in your memories.
Oh Yeah!
#24027 posted by sock on 2014/02/05 15:06:43
Not Quite 16 Bit...
but Dave Rapoza is awesome, I would actually love to see a dark souls metroidvania in that style (symphony of the night is one of my alltime fave games). I love his Skull and Shark stuff.
http://daverapoza.tumblr.com/
Dungeon Keeper 2
#24029 posted by ijed on 2014/02/05 15:37:35
Nobody bit the bait? I downloaded DK mobile the other day after reading all the INTERNET CONTROVERSY and found it the perfection of the free to play format.
I'm really glad they released it since now the backlash should mean that free to play gets seriously hurt. It's just a shame Dungeon Keeper was the sacrificial goat needed.
All the big reviewers (ie. the ones who stand to lose by giving it a bad review) rate it 10. Every single user review on Metacritic gives it 0.
It prompted me to go to GOG and buy both original games.
Also;
http://imgur.com/a/tiOii
Spirit.
#24031 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/05 16:18:49
No, but I did once mix up your mum's face and a goat's arse. Really wish I'd looked closer and stuck my wang in the goat instead.
Kinn, can we presume that you are celebrating the death of a bad thing?
#24032 posted by JneeraZ on 2014/02/05 18:33:32
"appallingly broken damage feedback"
*beep**beep**beep**beep**beep**beep**beep**beep*
Never Heard Of DK Mobile
#24033 posted by Kinn on 2014/02/05 19:02:49
but "Free To Play" (aka "Pay To Win") is the most abhorrent fucking thing to ever happen to the games industry. Games design is no longer about giving the player an honest fun game in return for a fixed sum, it's about manipulating the player and extorting small amounts of money over and over again, for as long as they can.
Actual gamers hate it like dick cancer, but the millions of casuals who never play proper games and just want to tit around with their phones fall for it like lemmings, and make these companies billions.
Shmablre
#24034 posted by Kinn on 2014/02/05 19:12:50
Kinn, can we presume that you are celebrating the death of a bad thing?
Wait, what was that in reference to?
Free Free Free
#24035 posted by sock on 2014/02/05 19:24:38
Anyone who thinks they can download something for free and get good quality content for their phone is an idiot! Everything comes with a price, F2P design, a sea of adverts or Social media hooks.
It funny really, we all make extra content for a 15+ year old game and that's free right! what crazy fools we are ... :P
#24036 posted by Spirit on 2014/02/05 19:32:37
Yay Long Links On Func!
#24037 posted by Spirit on 2014/02/05 19:32:51
|